Stereochemistry alkyne derivatives

Alkenyl zirconium complexes derived from alkynes form C—C bonds when added to aHyUc palladium complexes. The stereochemistry differs from that found in reactions of corresponding carbanions with aHyl—Pd in a way that suggests the Cp2ZrRCl alkylates first at Pd, rather than by direct attack on the aUyl group (259). 

For alkyl-substituted alkynes, there is a difference in stereochemistry between mono-and disubstituted derivatives. The former give syn addition whereas the latter react by anti addition. The disubstituted (internal) compounds are considerably ( 100 times) more reactive than the monosubstituted (terminal) ones. This result suggests that the transition state of the rate-determining step is stabilized by both of the alkyl substituents and points to a bridged intermediate. This would be consistent with the overall stereochemistry of the reaction for internal alkynes. 

A valuable feature of the Nin/Crn-mediated Nozaki-Takai-Hiyama-Kishi coupling of vinyl iodides and aldehydes is that the stereochemistry of the vinyl iodide partner is reflected in the allylic alcohol coupling product, at least when disubstituted or trans tri-substituted vinyl iodides are employed.68 It is, therefore, imperative that the trans vinyl iodide stereochemistry in 159 be rigorously defined. Of the various ways in which this objective could be achieved, a regioselective syn addition of the Zr-H bond of Schwartz s reagent (Cp2ZrHCl) to the alkyne function in 165, followed by exposure of the resulting vinylzirconium species to iodine, seemed to constitute a distinctly direct solution to this important problem. Alkyne 165 could conceivably be derived in short order from compound 166, the projected product of an asymmetric crotylboration of achiral aldehyde 168. 

To probe the reaction mechanism of the silane-mediated reaction, EtjSiD was substituted for PMHS in the cyclization of 1,6-enyne 34a.5 The mono-deuterated reductive cyclization product 34b was obtained as a single diastereomer. This result is consistent with entry of palladium into the catalytic cycle as the hydride derived from its reaction with acetic acid. Alkyne hydrometallation provides intermediate A-7, which upon cw-carbopalladation gives rise to cyclic intermediate B-6. Delivery of deuterium to the palladium center provides C-2, which upon reductive elimination provides the mono-deuterated product 34b, along with palladium(O) to close the catalytic cycle. The relative stereochemistry of 34b was not determined but was inferred on the basis of the aforementioned mechanism (Scheme 24). 

Most of these catalytic systems are able to dimerize either aromatic alkynes, such as phenylacetylene derivatives, or aliphatic alkynes, such as trimethylsilylacetylene, tert-butylacetylene and benzylacetylene. The stereochemistry of the resulting enynes depends strongly on both the alkyne and the catalyst precursor. It is noteworthy that the vinylidene ruthenium complex RuCl(Cp )(PPh3)(=C=CHPh) catalyzes the dimerization of phenylacetylene and methylpropiolate with high stereoselectivity towards the ( )-enyne [65, 66], and that head-to-tail dimerization is scarcely favored with this catalyst. It was also shovm that the metathesis catalyst RuCl2(P-Cy3)2(=CHPh) reacted in refiuxing toluene with phenylacetylene to produce a... 

Each of the syntheses of seychellene summarized in Scheme 20 illustrates one of the two important methods for generating vinyl radicals. In the more common method, the cyclization of vinyl bromide (34) provides tricycle (35).93 Because of the strength of sjp- bonds to carbon, the only generally useful precursors of vinyl radicals in this standard tin hydride approach are bromides and iodides. Most vinyl radicals invert rapidly, and therefore the stereochemistry of the radical precursor is not important. The second method, illustrated by the conversion of (36) to (37),94 generates vinyl radicals by the addition of the tin radical to an alkyne.95-98 The overall transformation is a hydrostannylation, but a radical cyclization occurs between the addition of the stannyl radical and the hydrogen transfer. Concentration may be important in these reactions because direct hydrostannylation of die alkyne can compete with cyclization. Stork has demonstrated that the reversibility of the stannyl radical addition step confers great power on this method.93 For example, in the conversion of (38) to (39), the stannyl radical probably adds reversibly to all of the multiple bond sites. However, the radicals that are produced by additions to the alkene, or to the internal carbon of the alkyne, have no favorable cyclization pathways. Thus, all the product (39) derives from addition to the terminal alkyne carbon. Even when cyclic products might be derived from addition to the alkene, followed by cyclization to the alkyne, they often are not found because 0-stannyl alkyl radicals revert to alkenes so rapidly that they do not close. 

Their retro synthetic study was based around the Pauson-Khand cyclization (6), which couples an alkene, an alkyne, and a carbon monoxide source (typically dicobalt octacarbonyl) to give a cyclopentenone ring (Fig. 3.5, top). This reaction has been widely used for synthetic purposes, and some excellent reviews (7,8) have covered its principal features and the recent improvements to its experimental conditions. This reaction, in its intramolecular version, is ideal for the assembly of the l//-[2]pyrindi-none scaffold in two distinct versions, differing in the stereochemistry of the ring junction (Fig. 3.5, bottom). Hence, the readily available unsaturated amino acid derivatives 3.1a,b undergo intramolecular Pauson-Khand reaction to produce the two unsamrated scaffolds 3.2a,b. 

Ketones and 1,2-diketones are readily converted into alkynes, which can subsequently be reduced to alkenes. Since there are a number of methods to reduce alkynes stereoselectively, this route offers a method of controlling the stereochemistry of acyclic alkenes derived from ketone starting materials. The most common approach for the ketone to alkyne transformation has been conversion of the starting ketone into a vicinal dichloride and subsequent bis elimination induced by strong base. ... 

When we first introduced the concept of enantiomers and chirality in Chapter 16, we stressed that any imbalance in enantiomers always derives ultimately from nature. A laboratory synthesis, unless it involves an enantiomerically pure starting material or reagent, will always give a mixture of enantiomers. Here is just such a synthesis of the Japanese beetle pheromone you have just met. You can see the Z-selective Lindlar reduction in use—only one geometrical isomer of the double bond is formed— but, of course, the product is necessarily racemic and therefore useless as beetle bait, because in the original addition of the lithiated alkyne to the aldehyde there can be no control over stereochemistry. If all the starting materials and reagents are achiral, the product must be... 

The total syntheses of (+)-secosyrins 1 and 2 was achieved and their relative and absolute stereochemistry was unambiguously established by C. Mukai and co-workers. To construct the spiro skeleton of these natural products, the intramolecular Nicholas reaction was utilized. The alkyne substrate was first converted to the dicobalt hexacarbonyl complex by treatment with Co2(CO)8 in ether. Exposure of the resulting complex to boron trifluoride etherate at room temperature brought about the ring closure with inversion of configuration at C5 to afford the expected tetrahydrofuran derivative. The minor product was the C5 epimer which was formed only in 15% yield. 

---