Aliased/confounded effect

The given ratio helps to determine aliased/confounded effects. For this, it is necessary to multiply successively both sides of the defining contrast by factors from matrix columns. Factor X4 is in this case obtained ... 

It is then multiplied by each factor from the design 23"1. If the given yields offer the square of the factor, it is automatically replaced by the number one. Aliased/confounded effects for the observed half-replica are given by these ratios ... 

This means that regression coefficients will be estimated as these aliased/confounded effects ... 

Using the BH algorithm to estimate the effects, we note that column AB has the same signs as column C, column AC has those of column B, column BC those of column A and column ABC those of I. Hence the linear combination of observations in column A, 1a, can be used to estimate not only the main effect of A but also the BC interaction (1a = A + BC 1 a = A — BC if we select C = —AB as generator). Two (or more) effects that share this type of relationship are termed aliases". As a consequence, aliasing" is a direct result of fractional replication. In many practical situations, it will be possible to select a fraction of the experiments so that the main effect and the low-order interactions that are of interest become aliased (confounded) only with high-order interactions, which are probably negligible. 

Now consider a fractional replica of type 215 11, which is the 1/2048-replica of a FUFE. It is pointless in this case to write down all aliased/confounded estimates as their number is enormous. As an example, linear effects are aliased/confounded with 105 even interactions. The design matrix of 215 11 is shown in Table 2.96. 

Movement to optimum by an inadequate linear model is also possible in cases when doing the mentioned eight trials is not acceptable. The values of linear regression coefficients are considerably above the values of those for interactions, the more so since linear effects are not aliased/confounded with interaction effects. Although the movement to optimum by an inadequate linear model is mathematically incorrect, it may be accepted in practice with an adequate risk. Note that when trying to optimize a process one should aspire towards both the smallest possible interaction effects and approximate or symmetrical linear coefficients. In problems of interpolation models, the situation is exactly the opposite since it insists on interaction effects, which may be significant. 

It is of course possible to compute aliases of confounded effects from each block and then separate the confoundings by comparing the different aliases to each other. It will be a good exercise for the reader to do this. As a hint, the aliases of confounded effects which can be computed from the first block is given by the generators. 

Fractional replication causes confusion among the factor effects. This confusion is called confounding or aliasing . To see this, compare the signs in the columns in the fractional factorial design ... 

The relationship D = ABC in this design is called the generator. The factor D and the three-factor interaction ABC are called aliases of one another because they are confounded. All aliases can be determined with the help of the defining relation or defining contrast (I). It is obtained by multiplying the effects occuring in the generator. 

Bracketing and matrixing are the two reduced designs recommended by the FDA [9]. Each of these methods applies to different situations. Using both of them simultaneously may reduce the ability of the study to determine the shelf life since factor combinations can be confounded due to the aliasing effect [10]. 

From these results, estimates of the main effect and aliases of confounded two-variable interaction effects can be computed. These values are shown on the next page. 

The consequences for the confounding patterns, if some variable turns out to be not significant, can be determined from the confounding pattern of the fractional design as all effects associated with the insignificant variables can be removed from the aliases obtained from each column. This technique is not entirely fool-proof and should not be routinely applied. It is sometimes a useful technique for obtaining new ideas. These ideas must then, of course, be checked through experiments. 

Fixed Effects, Random Effects, Main Effects, and Interactions Nested and Crossed Factors Aliasing and Confounding... 

If each level of one factor only occurs at a specific level of another factor, then the two factors are said to be confounded. When confounding or aliasing occurs, the data analysis cannot distinguish between the effects of the two confounded factors. 

Step 3 Choose the design for your experiment. Fractional factorial designs or low-resolution designs are best for process development work where there are several (say four or more) factors to consider. Full factorial designs are used when it is necessary to eliminate all confounding or aliases between main effects and interactions. 

As there are 16 effects but only 8 experiments, we would expect the effects to be confounded with each other, as these are only 8 independent combinations of terms. Thus the columns 1 and 234 are the same so are 12 and 34. This shows us that when we are estimating Pi we in fact obtain an estimate of P, + P234. The effects are confounded or aliased as follows ... 

---