Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Alcohols free energy change

This expression makes possible the examination of extrathermodynamic correlation between the free energy changes for two dissociation equilibria, i.e. AGhet(R-R ) values of the hydrocarbons and AGhet(ROH + HsO" ) values of the alcohols. [Pg.196]

Since other possible transformations, such as, formation of dimethyl ether, higher alcohols, and hydrocarbons, are accompanied with higher negative free-energy change, methanol is thermodynamically a less probable product. Therefore, solely on a thermodynamic basis, these compounds as well as methane should be formed in preference to methanol. To avoid the formation of the former compounds, the synthesis of methanol requires selective catalysts and suitable reaction conditions. Under such conditions, methanol is the predominant product. This indicates that the transformations leading to the formation of the other compounds are kinetically controlled. In the methanol-to-hydrocarbon conversion, dimethyl ether generally is converted similarly to methanol. [Pg.114]

K. Burton and H. A. Krebs, The free energy changes associated with the individual steps of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, glycolysis, alcoholic fermentation, and with the hydrolysis of the pyrophosphate group of adensosine triphosphate, Biochem.. /. 54, 94-107 (1953). [Pg.190]

When a compound contains both a C=C double bond as well as a 0=0 double bond, the thermodynamics of the system favours the reduction of the former. For example, for crotonaldehyde (CH3CH=CHCH=0) hydrogenation, the free energy change for conversion to butyraldehyde (C3H7CHO), crotyl alcohol (CH3CH=CHCH20H) and -n-butanol at 273 K are —71, —31 and —105 kJ mol-1 respectively. Therefore, crotonaldehyde conversion over non-modified supported metal catalysts usually yields saturated butyraldehyde as the initial product, with butanol as either a primary or secondary product. [Pg.333]

Research on the physicochemical properties of A -acylamino acids has been periodic, except for the effort at Ajinimoto Company, lead primarily by Yoshida, Takehara, and Sakamoto. As a result, there are few systematic studies on the structure and property relationship of Af-acylamino acids. Sakamoto introduced the hydrophobicity of amino acid as a measure of such structure and activity relationship [48,49]. The hydrophobicity of each amino acid is proposed by Tanford as a free-energy change from ethyl alcohol to water and normalized to Gly, as shown by the Eq. (1) [50] (Table 2). [Pg.86]

AG, Ala = Free-energy change for Ala from ethyl alcohol to water AG, Gly = Free-energy change for Gly from ethyl alcohol to water Ag, Ala = Normalized hydrophobicity of Ala... [Pg.86]

TABLE 2 Free-Energy Change of Each Amino Acid from Ethyl Alcohol (cal/mol, 25°C)... [Pg.87]

Fig.A14.2 depicts the free energy changes AG with the % alcohol (v/v) in the reduction of the complec by ascorbic acid. In this figure AGtr for the complex (C) and for ascoibic acid (A) and the sum of these AGtr (i-s.) are shown for diffoent MeOH/water ratios. The variation with the solvent composition of the change in the free energy of activation 6AG. and of AGfr (t.s.) are also dq>icted where t.s. refers to the transition state. Fig.A14.2 depicts the free energy changes AG with the % alcohol (v/v) in the reduction of the complec by ascorbic acid. In this figure AGtr for the complex (C) and for ascoibic acid (A) and the sum of these AGtr (i-s.) are shown for diffoent MeOH/water ratios. The variation with the solvent composition of the change in the free energy of activation 6AG. and of AGfr (t.s.) are also dq>icted where t.s. refers to the transition state.
The results obtained by measuring the affinity to oxygen in the presence of various monohydric alcohols (methanol, ethanol, 2-propanol, 1-propanol) 140-144> were interpreted in terms of the Monod-Wyman-Changeux model145), by which the change of the standard free-energy difference between R and T state in the absence of oxygen, due to the addition of alcohol, can be determined, i.e. [Pg.26]

The 1.8 kcal mol 1 less favorable change in Gibbs free energy for the addition of water to [18+] to give [18]-OH in 50/50 (v/v) trifluoroethanol/water (p/CR = -11.3)104 than for addition of water to Me-[6+] in the same solvent (pATR = -12.6)13 shows that the former carbocation is stabilized relative to the alcohol. This stabilization may be the result of the smaller entropic price paid to restrict the / —CH bonds in the five-membered ring at [18+] to conformations that are favorable for hyperconjugation with the cationic carbon. [Pg.104]


See other pages where Alcohols free energy change is mentioned: [Pg.196]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.763]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.2153]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.89]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.781 ]




SEARCH



Alcohol-free

Free change

© 2024 chempedia.info