Agrochemical residue immunoassay applications

Pesticides, including insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides, are widely used in agriculture, and the potential for these residues to accumulate in food has led to concern for human safety. Pesticide residues may enter food animals from environmental sources or from treated or contaminated feeds. Immunoassay development for pesticides has had major impacts for pesticide registrations, analysis of residues in foods, monitoring environmental contamination, determination of occupational exposure, and integration of pest management. 

Because of the possibility that the herbicide alachlor could adulterate food if either poultry or livestock consumed contaminated materials, Lehotay and Miller evaluated three commercial immunoassays in milk and urine samples from a cow dosed with alachlor. They found that milk samples needed to be diluted with appropriate solvents (1 2, v/v) to eliminate the matrix effect. One assay kit (selected based on cost) was also evaluated for use with eggs and liver samples from chickens. Egg and liver samples were blended with acetonitrile, filtered, and diluted with water. Linear calibration curves prepared from fortified egg and liver samples were identical 

Experiments with aldicarb sulfone in ground beef involved simple extraction with acetonitrile during tissue homogenization and resulted in a definite immunoassay response at the tolerance level of 10 qg kg A moderate, but rather consistent, matrix effect was observed. A more severe matrix effect was observed in bovine milk, blood, and urine. For the liquid matrices, sample dilution was not a satisfactory strategy, because the assay variability increased at lower concentrations, negating any benefit of reducing the matrix effect. This work clearly demonsttated that matrix effects are 

Using a simple solvent extraction procedure to minimize matrix effects, a diclofop-methyl immunoassay was developed for milk, a number of edible plant products, and other matrices. Gas chromatography (GC) and liquid scintillation counting (LSC) of a C-labeled analyte were used as reference methods to compare with enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results. The methods were well correlated, with comparison of EIA 

Van Emon et al. ° developed an immunoassay for paraquat and applied this assay to beef tissue and milk samples. Milk was diluted with a Tween 20-sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), fortified with paraquat, and analyzed directly. Fortified paraquat was detected in milk at less than 1 pgkg , a concentration which is considerably below the tolerance level of 10 pg kg Ground beef was extracted with 6 N HCl and sonication. Radiolabeled paraquat was extracted from ground beef with recoveries of 60-70% under these conditions. The correlation coefficient of ELISA and LSC results for the ground beef sample was excellent, with = 0.99, although the slope was 0.86, indicating a significant but reproducible difference between the assays. 

---