Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Adsorption from electrolyte solutions approaches

Recent studies [6-14] on adsorption from electrolyte solutions on energetically homogeneous electrode surfaces, like the surface of the Hg electrode, show that at least for aqueous solutions the above approach should be re-examined in two respects first in what concerns the adsorption mechanism (1) and second the treatment of the intermolecular interactions at the surface solution. The adsorption mechanism (1) should be re-examined since, using a thermodynamic method proposed for the determination of the size ratio parameter ni, the value nj = 1 0.2 has been found for a variety of experimental systems, despite the fact that the adsorbate molecules can have dimensions considerably different from those of the solvent molecules [6-11]. In what concerns the intermolecular interactions, in the presence of polar molecules a significant contribution arises from the electric field across the surface solution, which is created by their dipoles [7,12-14]. Similarly, an electric field is established when ions, either from an electrolyte in the bulk solution or from impurities, penetrate the surface solution. In both cases this field is expected to have a dominant effect on the surface activities. [Pg.729]

The approach described above has been applied to treat experimental data on adsorption of pyridine from the electrolyte solutions [61]. Using Eq. 28 made it possible to determine the slip length as a function of surface excesses of pyridine. In agreement with the theoretical prediction, it was found that bs grows with Ta. The values of bs did not exceed 0.3 nm and 1.2 nm for adsorption from butanol and water solutions, respectively. The dependence of slip length on surface excess was essentially linear (Eq. 30) for pyridine adsorption from butanol solution, but deviated from linearity for pyridine adsorption from water. The deviation was attributed to a reorientation of adsorbed pyridine molecules at the Au surface. [Pg.129]

As for phosphate, the adsorption reaction of organic phosphorus is not readily reversible, although some phosphorus can pass to the solution depending on the time of desorption, the solution-to-soil ratio, and temperature (Barrow, 1983). As solution characteristics play an important role in desorption, different approaches using free water, dilute electrolyte solutions, or chemical extractants with variable pH and ionic composition have been used to quantify the amount of phosphorus desorbable from minerals and then available to plants (Frossard et al, 1995). Desorption of inorganic and organic phosphorus was found to increase with pH (Cabrera et al, 1981 Celi et al, 2003 Martin et al, 2003), with the percentage of phosphorus saturation (Parfitt, 1979 He et a7., 1991, 1994 Martin... [Pg.118]

An approach similar to PC has been proposed by Mohihier et al. (MNM theory) Their basic idea was to treat the adsorbed layer as a two-component non-electrolyte solution called the surface solu-The field effect as well as any correlation to molecular or structural properties of the surface solution are missing from the original MNM theory. At this stage this theory differs a little from a curve fitting procedure. In subsequent papers the introduction of the field effect has been attempted following the TPC approach.Thus the MNM theory and its extensions do not offer a real alternative approach to the theoretical description of adsorption on electrodes. [Pg.138]

Last, in order for an anion to adsorb onto a metal surface from the solution, three processes must occur. The first process that occurs removes the water molecule from the adsorption site—including adjacent sites if the anion is larger than a water molecule. The second process occurs near the OHP as the anion must partially or fully dehydrate its solvation sheath and, finally, the anion must adsorb into the site created by the vacated water molecules. One approach is to assume the adsorption of the anions to be approximately governed by the Langmuir isotherm in that an anion adsorbed near the metal surface has occupied that adsorption site, and so another anion in the electrolyte cannot occupy that site and must diffuse to a vacant site in order to adsorb. [Pg.107]

Consider the structure of an interface layer between a metal electrode and an electrolyte solution kept under a potential difference electrostatic adsorption) and the dipolar molecules are oriented along the lines of the electric force. They can also be physically or chemically adsorbed specifically adsorbed) on the electrode. In the case of electrostatic adsorption alone, ions can approach the electrode to a distance given by their primary solvation shells. The plane parallel to the electrode surface through the centers of elecfrostatically adsorbed ions at their maximum approach to the electrode is called the outer Helmholtz plane (OFIP) and the solution region between the OHP and the electrode surface is called the Helmholtz or compact layer. Due to thermal motion the ions are not confined within the compact layer, but are distributed over the so-called diffuse layer. The plane through the centers of specifically adsorbed ions is referred to as the inner Helmholtz plane (IHP) (Fig. 2.21). [Pg.45]

The separation of charges may arise in various ways. At a solid-electrolyte solution interface there is likely to be preferential adsorption of one ion or another on the solid surface, with a corresponding excess of the counterion in the adjacent solution. (Even at the air surface of an electrolyte solution there is an electrical separation, as most anions tend to approach the surface more closely than cations.) Above all, the effect will be important where a charged species is able to pass across the boundary from one phase to the other, as in the ionisation of surface groups of a colloidal particle, or at the interface salt crystal-solution, or at a metal electrode. [Pg.79]

The electric field or ionic term corresponds to an ideal parallel-plate capacitor, with potential drop g (ion) = qMd/4ire. Itincludes a contribution from the polarizability of the electrolyte, since the dielectric constant is included in the expression. The distance d between the layers of charge is often taken to be from the outer Helmholtz plane (distance of closest approach of ions in solution to the metal in the absence of specific adsorption) to the position of the image charge in the metal a model for the metal is required to define this position properly. The capacitance per unit area of the ideal capacitor is a constant, e/Aird, often written as Klon. The contribution to 1/C is 1 /Klon this term is much less important in the sum (larger capacitance) than the other two contributions.2... [Pg.14]

Another interface that needs to be mentioned in the context of polarized interfaces is the interface between the insulator and the electrolyte. It has been proposed as a means for realization of adsorption-based potentiometric sensors using Teflon, polyethylene, and other hydrophobic polymers of low dielectric constant Z>2, which can serve as the substrates for immobilized charged biomolecules. This type of interface happens also to be the largest area interface on this planet the interface between air (insulator) and sea water (electrolyte). This interface behaves differently from the one found in a typical metal-electrolyte electrode. When an ion approaches such an interface from an aqueous solution (dielectric constant Di) an image charge is formed in the insulator. In other words, the interface acts as an electrostatic mirror. The two charges repel each other, due to the low dielectric constant (Williams, 1975). This repulsion is called the Born repulsion H, and it is given by (5.10). [Pg.106]

The potential in the diffuse layer decreases exponentially with the distance to zero (from the Stem plane). The potential changes are affected by the characteristics of the diffuse layer and particularly by the type and number of ions in the bulk solution. In many systems, the electrical double layer originates from the adsorption of potential-determining ions such as surface-active ions. The addition of an inert electrolyte decreases the thickness of the electrical double layer (i.e., compressing the double layer) and thus the potential decays to zero in a short distance. As the surface potential remains constant upon addition of an inert electrolyte, the zeta potential decreases. When two similarly charged particles approach each other, the two particles are repelled due to their electrostatic interactions. The increase in the electrolyte concentration in a bulk solution helps to lower this repulsive interaction. This principle is widely used to destabilize many colloidal systems. [Pg.250]


See other pages where Adsorption from electrolyte solutions approaches is mentioned: [Pg.737]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.601]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.994]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.729]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.685]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.639]    [Pg.855]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.3]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.727 , Pg.728 , Pg.729 ]




SEARCH



Adsorption approach

Adsorption from solutions

Adsorption solution

Electrolyte solutions

Electrolytes adsorption

Electrolytic solution

Solution approaches

Solution electrolyte solutes

© 2024 chempedia.info