Adiabatic combustion temperature change

Fig. 4. Variation of adiabatic flame temperature with heat of combustion where + i+i°yk— CO- Note change of scale at 46.5 MJ /kg (20,000...

The experiments are usually carried out at atmospheric pressure and the initial goal is the determination of the enthalpy change associated with the calorimetric process under isothermal conditions, AT/icp, usually at the reference temperature of 298.15 K. This involves (1) the determination of the corresponding adiabatic temperature change, ATad, from the temperature-time curve just mentioned, by using one of the methods discussed in section 7.1 (2) the determination of the energy equivalent of the calorimeter in a separate experiment. The obtained AT/icp value in conjunction with tabulated data or auxiliary calorimetric results is then used to calculate the enthalpy of an hypothetical reaction with all reactants and products in their standard states, Ar77°, at the chosen reference temperature. This is the equivalent of the Washburn corrections in combustion calorimetry... 

A reaction at the initial temperature changes the characteristics of an explosive mixture before the flame front and introduces an element of nonsteadiness into the process of propagation of the combustion wave. The method proposed in [1] to describe this effect consists in replacing the original non-steady problem by a quasi-steady one with adiabatically increasing initial temperature Ta(f) and an effective source of heat release which takes this increase into account. We test this method below by comparing it directly with the results of a numerical solution of the original non-steady problem. 

Use the plotting and calculation procedures described in Exp. 6 in order to determine the adiabatic temperature change associated with each combustion run. The same extrapolation procedure should be used for both esters and used in as consistent a maimer as possible so that any systematic errors inherent in the procedure will cancel out in the calculation of the strain energy. 

Figure 1.9 shows the predicted major species for the equilibrium combustion of CH4 with air (21% 02, 79% N2) and with pure 02, as a function of the gas temperature. The highest possible temperature for the air/CH4 and the 02/CH4 reaction is the adiabatic equilibrium temperature of 3537°F (2220 K) and 5038°F (3054 K), respectively. For the air/CH4 reaction, there is very little change in the predicted gas composition as a function of temperature. For the 02/CH4 reaction, there is a significant change in the composition as the gas temperature increases above about 3000°F (1900 K). Figure 1.10 shows the predicted minor species for the same conditions as in Figure 1.9. Again, NO has been specifically excluded. For the air/CH4, none of the minor species exceeds 1% by volume. As the gas temperature increases, chemical dissociation increases. For the 02/CH4 flame, significant levels of unreacted fuel (CO and H2), radical species (O, H, and OH), and unreacted 02 are present at high gas temperatures.

It follows that the efficiency of the Carnot engine is entirely determined by the temperatures of the two isothermal processes. The Otto cycle, being a real process, does not have ideal isothermal or adiabatic expansion and contraction of the gas phase due to the finite thermal losses of the combustion chamber and resistance to the movement of the piston, and because the product gases are not at tlrermodynamic equilibrium. Furthermore the heat of combustion is mainly evolved during a short time, after the gas has been compressed by the piston. This gives rise to an additional increase in temperature which is not accompanied by a large change in volume due to the constraint applied by tire piston. The efficiency, QE, expressed as a function of the compression ratio (r) can only be assumed therefore to be an approximation to the ideal gas Carnot cycle. 

In the above example of the combustion of carbon monoxide the time found experimentally in which the pressure reaches a maximum is 0.4 sec the combustion time of a single element according to an estimate based on the theory of flame propagation [11, 12], is less than 0.001 sec. The loss of heat in 0.4 sec is considerable the increase in pressure takes place so slowly that the state of the gas does not change adiabatically upon compression, and despite the compression each element cools after combustion. However, in 0.001 sec the loss of heat is negligibly small and each element in burning does attain the temperature Tp. 

The ratio (10) that we obtain is so small that there is no need to attempt to establish more exactly the relation between the heat transfer and heat of reaction in the various theories of normal combustion [3, 4, 15-18], or the accuracy of the temperature differences in the detonation wave, or to undertake other similar operations which can in no way change the basic results the smallness of the heat flux in the direction of propagation of detonation the adiabatic character (which holds with great accuracy as long as we do not consider heat losses to the walls of the tube) of the chemical reaction in the detonation wave the impossibility of any noticeable role of heat transfer from the heated combustion products in ignition of the fresh, unreacted gas. 

Since the maximum attainable temperature is sought, we assume complete adiabatic (Q = 0) combustion. With the additional assumptions that the kinetic- and potential-energy changes are negligible and that there is no shaft work, the overall energy balance for the process reduces to AH = 0. For purposes of calculation of the final temperature, any convenient path between the initial and final states may be used. The path chosen is indicated in the diagram. With one mole of methane burned as the basis for all calculations,... 

If the combustion can be considered as adiabatic (that is, AQ = 0), then it is also isoenthalpic, or All — 0. This is a reasonable assumption for most flames, since radiation is usually quite small compared to combustion. This permits the temperature of the completely burned gases to be determined from the composition and temperature of the reacting mixture and the enthalpy change of the over-all reaction. (Note that we have neglected kinetic energy terms.)... 

Systems that are able to quench the high-temperature combustion gases from 1000-1200°C (1832-2192°F) to adiabatic (75-90°C) in fractions of a second have emissions well below the levels established by the recent MACT standards (0.2 ng/dscm TEQ). This rapid quenching action freezes the reaction from the combustion zone preventing changes to the reaction products. Gradual cooling... 

The principle of the calculation is similar to that used for a constant-pressure calorimeter as explained by the paths shown in Fig. 11.11 on page 334. When the combustion reaction in the segment of gas reaches reaction equilibrium, the advancement has changed hy and the temperature has increased from T to T2. Because the reaction is assumed to he adiabatic at constant pressure, A7/(expt) is zero. Therefore, the sum of A//(rxn, T ) and A7/(P) is zero, and we can write... 

Adiabatic and Isoperibol Calorimeters.—Most calorimeters used in combustion and reaction calorimetry undergo a change of temperature when reaction takes place. If the calorimeter is surrounded by a jacket, the temperature of which is controlled to be the same as that of the calorimeter, no heat-exchange occurs between the siuroundings and the calorimeter, which is then described as adiabatic. However, if the temperature of the environment is maintained constant (in a type of calorimeter conveniently described as isoperibol and sometimes, incorrectly, as isothermal) some heat-exchange occurs between the calorimeter and its surroundings, but may be accurately determined by analysis of the temperature-time curves before and after reaction takes place, provided the reaction is of short duration (say not exceeding 15 min). With slower processes, isoperibol calorimeters are less useful, and the adiabatic principle is easier to effect and yields more accurate results. 

---