Acceptor factors

AG and AH can be expressed as a multiplicative function of hydrogen bonding in different polar and nonpolar solvents by means of enthalpy acceptor factors E - enthalpy donor factors free energy acceptor factors Q, and free energy donor factors Q (Eqs. (32) and (33), where kj, 2- 3 [kcal/mol] are regression coefficients). 

The HYBOT descriptors were successfully applied to the prediction of the partition coefficient log P (>i--octanol/water) for small organic componnds with one acceptor group from their calculated polarizabilities and the free energy acceptor factor C, as well as properties like solubility log S, the permeability of drugs (Caco-2, human skin), and for the modeling of biological activities. 

From 163 calculated H-bond donor and 195 calculated H-bond acceptor factors, one can get enthalpy and free energy values for 31785 reactions using Eqs. (3) and (4). Later, the number of H-bond factor values was significantly increased. A special program for calculating factor values was created and included in the HYBOT (Hydrogen Bond Thermodynamics) program [28, 29]. The current version, HYBOT-2006, has about 20000 values of H-bond acceptor factors and about 5000... 

Table 6.2 demonstrates large intervals of enthalpy and free energy H-bond donor and acceptor factor values as result of a different nature of H-bonding atoms as well as an infiuence of substituents at those atoms on its H-bond capability. 

Tab. 6.2 Enthalpy and free energy H-bond donor and acceptor factor values for a few chemicals [28].

A quantitative description of human skin permeabiUty (kp) based on H-bond donor and acceptor factors was obtained with 22 alcohols and steroids [63] ... 

Usually aquatic toxicity of chemicals with general narcosis mechanism of action is described by the octanol/water partition coefficient [73]. However, log is a composite descriptor which has components of molecular volume and H-bond acceptor terms. Raevsky and Dearden [74] therefore used molecular polarizabihty (as a volume-related term) and the H-bond acceptor factor instead of log to model aquatic toxicity (log LC50) to the guppy for 90 chemicals with general narcosis mechanisms. This excellent correlation has statistical criteria better than that obtained for the same data using log Pofy, ... 

Sum of H-bond acceptor factors (HYBOT) [23] also SumCa Sum of H-bond acceptor factors/molecular polarizability (HYBOT) [23] also SCa A... 

The rate of a given reaction depends on the thermal activation conditions of the particle in donor and acceptor, factors which are accounted for in the Marcus model [6,7] or models where the vibrational wave functions are included [8-10], The reaction rate is derived in rather much the same way as for ordinary chemical reactions, using the concept of potential energy surfaces (PES s) [6]. The electronic factor is introduced either as a matrix element H]2 or as an... 

The kinetic analysis [103] of electron transfer in colloidal semiconductor systems is often complex. Apart from the energetics of the conduction band of the semiconductor and the redox potential of the acceptor, factors such as the surface charges of the colloids, adsorption of the substrates, participation of surface states, and competition with charge recombination influence the rate of charge transfer at the semiconductor interface [102], This fact is evident from the widely differing rates of experimentally observed charge transfer rates, with time scales ranging from picoseconds to milliseconds for different experimental conditions and various semiconductor systems. 

Further inspection of the agreement of the SL model with observed Gibbs transfer energies suggests the involvement of underlying donor-acceptor factors. Previously, it was found for chloride ion transfer into various... 

The K factors in (C3.4.1) represent another very important facet of tire energy transfer [4, H]. These factors depend on tire orientations of tire donor and acceptor. For certain orientations tliey can reduce tire rate of energy transfer to zero—for otliers tliey effect an enhancement of tire energy transfer to its maximum possible rate. Figure C3.4.1 exhibits tire angles which define tire mutual orientation of a donor and acceptor pair in tenns of Arose angles the orientation factors and are given by [6, 7]... 

The contribution of this polar structure to the bonding lowers the energy of the transition state. This may be viewed as a lower activation energy for the addition step and thus a factor which promotes this particular reaction. The effect is clearly larger the greater the difference in the donor-acceptor properties of X and Y. The transition state for the successive addition of the same monomer (whether X or Y substituted) is structure [V] ... 

Phosphoms pentafluoride behaves as a Lewis acid showing electron-accepting properties. It forms complexes, generally in a ratio of 1 1 with Lewis bases, with amines, ethers, nitriles, sulfoxides, and other bases. These complexes are frequently less stable than the similar BF complexes, probably owing to stearic factors. Because it is a strong acceptor, PF is an excellent catalyst especially in ionic polymeri2ations. Phosphoms pentafluoride is also used as a source of phosphoms for ion implantation (qv) in semiconductors (qv) (26). 

In conclusion, one important factor that contributes to the strong affinity of TBP proteins to TATA boxes is the large hydrophobic interaction area between them. Major distortions of the B-DNA structure cause the DNA to present a wide and shallow minor groove surface that is sterically complementary to the underside of the saddle structure of the TBP protein. The complementarity of these surfaces, and in addition the six specific hydrogen bonds between four side chains from TBP and four hydrogen bond acceptors from bases in the minor groove, are the main factors responsible for causing TBP to bind to TATA boxes 100,000-fold more readily than to a random DNA sequence. 

The strength of the complexation is a function of both the donor atom and the metal ion. The solvent medium is also an important factor because solvent molecules that are potential electron donors can compete for the Lewis acid. Qualitative predictions about the strength of donor-acceptor complexation can be made on the basis of the hard-soft-acid-base concept (see Section 1.2.3). The better matched the donor and acceptor, the stronger is the complexation. Scheme 4.3 gives an ordering of hardness and softness for some neutral and ionic Lewis acids and bases. 

The reaction rates and product yields of [2+2] cycloadditions are expectedly enhanced by electronic factors that favor radical formation. Olefins with geminal capto-dative substituents are especially efficient partners (equations 33 and 34) because of the synergistic effect of the electron acceptor (capto) with the electron donor (dative) substituents on radical stability [95]... 

Factors Affecting the Stability of Donor-Acceptor Complexes ... 

Orbital energy is usually the deciding factor. The chemical reactions that we observe are the ones that proceed quickly, and such reactions typically have small energy barriers. Therefore, chemical reactivity should be associated with the donor-acceptor orbital combination that requires the smallest energy input for electron movement. The best combination is typically the one involving the HOMO as the donor orbital and the LUMO as the acceptor orbital. The HOMO and LUMO are collectively referred to as the frontier orbitals , and most chemical reactions involve electron movement between them. 

---