Zero-electron donor

As a matter of classification, these single bond complexes are divided into three groups according to the number of electrons formally donated by the borane ligand to the metal. The zero-electron donor (or electron pair acceptor) complex is exemplified by the compound Na[(OC)sMn BH3] (J), the one-electron donor by the compound l,2-(CH3)2-3-[(C5H5)Fe(CO)2]-BioC2H9 (2), and the two-electron donor by the compound (CH3)4N[7,8-B9H,oCHPCr(CO)5] (3). 

The observations that addition of pyridine increases the rate of decomposition, shifts the order of reaction from unity to zero, and considerably diminishes formation of 4-nitrophenol also warrants attention. This is compatible with the superior electron-donor properties of pyridine as compared to DMSO (Gutmann, 1976, 1977) generation of the corresponding diazopyridinium cation in one or several of the forms corresponding to 8.59 and 8.60 competes with formation of 8.58. 

Thus in Table 4.3 we add to Table 4.2 the last, but quite important, available piece of information, i.e. the observed kinetic order (positive order, negative order or zero order) of the catalytic reaction with respect to the electron donor (D) and the electron acceptor (A) reactant. We then invite the reader to share with us the joy of discovering the rules of electrochemical promotion (and as we will see in Chapter 6 the rules of promotion in general), i.e. the rules which enable one to predict the global r vs O dependence (purely electrophobic, purely electrophilic, volcano, inverted volcano) or the basis of the r vs pA and r vs pD dependencies. 

Inspection of Table 6.1 shows the following rule for electrophobic reactions Rule Gl A reaction exhibits purely electrophobic behaviour ((dr/dO)PA 0) when the kinetics are positive order in the electron donor (D) reactant and negative or zero order in the electron acceptor (A) reactant. 

Rule LIWhen the rate is negative or zero order in the electron acceptor A and positive order in the electron donor D then the reaction exhibits electrophobic behaviour. 

The kinetic factors Tb and Fa and thermodynamic potential factor Fj are largest where the electron donor and acceptor are abundant, and the reaction products are not. If under such conditions all three factors are equal to one, as is not uncommon, the reaction rate predicted by Equation 18.22 reaches its maximum value, rmax = nw k+ [X]. As the substrates are depleted with reaction progress, and reaction products accumulate, the factors eventually decrease toward zero, slowing the reaction to a near stop. 

Vitamin B12 catalyzed also the dechlorination of tetrachloroethene (PCE) to tri-chloroethene (TCE) and 1,2-dichloroethene (DCE) in the presence of dithiothreitol or Ti(III) citrate [137-141], but zero-valent metals have also been used as bulk electron donors [142, 143]. With vitamin B12, carbon mass recoveries were 81-84% for PCE reduction and 89% for TCE reduction cis-l,2-DCE, ethene, and ethyne were the main products [138, 139]. Using Ni(II) humic acid complexes, TCE reduction was more rapid, leading to ethane and ethene as the primary products [144, 145]. Angst, Schwarzenbach and colleagues [140, 141] have shown that the corrinoid-catalyzed dechlorinations of the DCE isomers and vinyl chloride (VC) to ethene and ethyne were pH-dependent, and showed the reactivity order 1,1-DCE>VC> trans-DCE>cis-DCE. Similar results have been obtained by Lesage and colleagues [146]. Dror and Schlautmann [147, 148] have demonstrated the importance of specific core metals and their solubility for the reactivity of a porphyrin complex. 

The forward and reverse rate constants are thus equal at zero standard free energy. However, this will be difficult to check in practice, for both reactions are very slow, since a bond-breaking/bond-forming process endowed with a quite large internal reorganization is involved. The result is that dissociative electron transfer reactions are usually carried out with electron donors that have a standard potential largely negative to the dissociative standard potential. The reoxidation of the R, X- system is thus possible only with electron acceptors, D +, that are different from the D,+ produced in the reduction process (they are more powerful oxidants). There is no reason then that the oxidation mechanism be the reverse of the... 

The three successive portions of the plot have slopes equal to zero, aFjRT and FjRT respectively, in terms of a In A + versus diagram. The (small) variation of a with the driving force has been omitted for clarity. Thus, if experimental points arising from a family of electron donors are available... 

Zero field splitting (zfs) values in photoexcited triplets of primary donor bacteriochlorophyll a in photosynthetic bacteria are much lower than those found for vitro BChla triplets. There is a pronounced difference in kinetics of population and depopulation of the triplet sublevels as well. The differences have been attributed to the effect of BChla dimerization and it is now generally accepted that the primary electron donor in photosynthetic bacteria consists of a BChla dimer (special pair)(l- ). 

Figure 4.1. Profile of the free energy surface along the co-ordinate of the R-X bond at zero driving force initial state R-X + electron donor final state R + X. ...

Investigations of the generation of super base sites on alkaline earth metal oxides by doping with alkali metals (246,247,253) led to the inference that when zero-valent alkali metals react with a metal oxide surface, the electron donated by the alkali metal to the oxide lattice resides in a defect site, such as an oxygen vacancy, generating a one-electron donor site (F center) (254,255) (Scheme 40). 

The coupling product occurred in high yield with iodobenzene (80% vs 3-bromothio-phene). With aryl bromides, an electron-withdrawing group was required to achieve the coupling reaction (with FG = p-CN and o-MeOCO, yields are 47% and 40%, respectively, vs 3-bromothiophene). Conversely, no coupling product was observed in the presence of electron-donor substituents. In this last case, the deactivated aryl bromide is certainly unreactive towards zero-valent palladium. 

Thus, the electronation and deelectronation reactions modify the electric field across the interface, and the field, in feedback style, alters the rates until the rates of M+ + e — M and M — M+ + e become equal. This is equilibrium. Underlying the condition of zero net current, an equilibrium exchange-current density Iq, flows across the interface in both directions. The potential difference across the interface at equilibrium depends upon the activity ratio of electron acceptor to electron donor in the solution. Alter the ratio, and the equilibrium potential changes.14... 

Now suppose that one starts off the constant current with a zero or negligibly small concentration of electron donor D in the electrolyte. Then Cp = 0, and Eq. (7.185) reduces to... 

Suppose a donor electron occupies an s-like state, e.g., an at state for a center with tetrahedral symmetry. Such a state is orbitally nondegenerate, but may accomodate two electrons, with opposite spins. Thus, the zero-electron... 

If the picture is correct then we see that the observed order of activation energies which is largest for molecular reactions, small for radical-molecule reactions and nearly zero for radical-radical reactions, falls into a 1 1 relation with the acid-base model. The radical-radical reactions have the open orbital and the electron donor, hence little promotion energy to form an attractive pair. The radical-molecule reactions have one open orbital but require polarization of the molecule in order to form the complimentary acid or base. For the molecule-molecule addition type reaction, complimentary polarization of both species must take place for an attractive transition state to form and the activation energy is the highest. 

---