Workplaces environment structure

In the workplace some factors have been shown to create stress for some workers. They are the lack of control on the job, the failure to fit into the workplace social structure, excessive demands of a job, or severe time expectations. The lack of job security has become very real with so much reorganizing and downsizing transpiring in the business community. Career pressures including increased responsibility are viewed as stressors by many workers. Some workers have jobs which are too complex for their talents, abilities, or skills. Last, but by no means unimportant, is the physical environment such as noise, temperature extremes, lighting, space and odors. 

While some Swedi observers suggest that Sweden is not immune fix>m the impact of neo-liberalism and as a result post-2" World War corporatist tradition is less in evidence in current practice dian in the past, OELs are nevertheless established within a corporatist national and sectoral environment and function in workplaces where ideally ttiere are well estabU ed participative structures and procedures in place which, with the siqipoit of external prevention services, contribute towards employers delivery of the systematic management of the risks of hazardous substances. 

The basic physical constants and structure diagrams for about 10,900 organic compounds are presented in this table. An effort has been made to include the compounds most frequently encountered in the laboratory, the workplace, and the environment. Particular emphasis has been given to substances that are considered environmental or human health hazards. In making the selection of compounds for the table, added weight was assigned to the appearance of a compound in various lists or reference sources such as ... 

Based on risk assessments, a manager lists and schedules the work needed to be done to create a safe and healthy work environment and to eliminate high-risk acts of people. If the need is to change the safety culture at the workplace, this would mean the inti oduction of a suitable structured SMS based on world s best practice. All SMS should be based on the nature of the business and be risk based, management led, and audit driven. 

Workplace releases CERCLA also excludes releases in the workplace, but only with respect to a claim asserted against the employer by a facility worker. Any claims covered by worker compensation through the OSHA regulations cannot be filed under CERCLA. The need for notification, however, must be determined by whether or not a release from a CERCLA facility or vessel enters into the environment. If a release does not remain wholly contained within a building or structure, then it is a release into the environment under CERCLA, whether or not it occurs within a workplace. 

Your ability to structure an environment that provides individual needs and adequate stimulus to motivate each person to his or her full capacity is desirable but not usually possible. In fact, you actually have little chance of setting up the perfect environment for every person. Just too many other environments and factors compete with you and what you desire each individual to accomplish. However, do the best you can for each person and then each individual will make a conscious decision as to whether he or she wants to perform safely in the workplace. This is the reason that each worker should know the consequences of any unsafe performance. You should develop mechanisms to assist these individuals to perform safely, but also have disciplinary procedures for those who elect not to comply with the safety and health rules. 

The way you structure the motivational environment will allow individuals within the work groups to accomplish safety and health goals and assure that they are free from injury and illness. What you need to do is set up an environment where people can be successful. And, in order for that enviromnent and the people within it to succeed, you must demonstrate that you genuinely care about them and the purpose of the mission (goals) they are trying to attain, which in this case is a safe and healthy workplace. 

This chapter provides a brief overview of the most important sources of rhetorical uncertainty in technical documentation in the workplace the dynamic uncertainty of hazardous environments the variability and unreliability of human performance the uncertainty of what one agency calls premium data uncertainty in social structures and organizations and the rhetorical incompleteness of any single viewpoint. As the examples in this chapter demonstrate, the material and institutional uncertainty of hazardous environments affects documentation practices at all levels. But documentation practices can also contribute to uncertainty, particularly when writers depend too heavily on agency conventions to structure recommendations and conclusions. 

---