Workplace controls, technological

The reasons for using airflow or contaminant dispersion visualization techniques may be divided into purely technical and pedagogical, both with the purpose to give a base for the design and proper use of a contaminant control technology for workplaces with a good air quality. 

ACGIH) also recommends a Threshold Limit Value (TLV-TWA) of 75 ppm (450 mg/m ) (ACGIH 1996). Current control technologies should limit workplace concentrations to this level. 

The workplace environment is a significant part of the total ecological system. Since it can be measured, some control over it can be achieved, and improvements in the control technologies in the workplace can be made. Because of the rapidly growing production of complex chemical substances and the use of these in modern living during the past three decades, the existence of chemical hazards in workplaces in relation to worker health and safety has become the subject of great concern. 

Technological Penalties Associated with Environmental and Workplace Controls... 

This two-volume book provides industrial exposure data and control technologies for more than 650 substances currently regulated, or candidates for regulation, by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), The health, toxicity, economic and technological data provided for each substance are intended to serve as a reference for those who are potentially exposed to one or more of these substances in their workplace, or for those who have supervisory or management responsibility for workers potentially exposed. OSHA "permissible exposure limits" (PELS) for these 650 substances reflect all updates and changes as presented in the Federal Register. 

Not only federal decision makers are concerned with exposure estimation. In private industry, assessments of employee exposure to various toxic substances used in the workplace, aside from those required by OSHA, are performed by industrial hygienists. Where exposures are felt to have the potential to result in employee health effects, systems engineers may be called in to alter the process or to add additional control technology, or special hazard warnings may be given to the affected employees. Similarly, if unusual clusters of health effects are observed by an industry s medical staff, they may seek exposure data to confirm a correlation between exposure to a certain chemical and the observation of a specific type of effect. In a similar fashion, public interest groups may seek exposure data to confirm a suspected dose-effect relationship. 

Ergonomists endorse the hierarchy of controls, which accords first place to engineering controls, because they believe that control technologies should be selected based on their reUability and efficacy in eliminating or reducing the workplace hazard (risk factors) giving rise to the MSD. Engineering controls are preferred because these controls and their effectiveness are... 

Air flow technologies that control workplace indoor environment and emissions... 

Control application of appropriate technology to reduce workplace exposures to acceptable levels. 

After potential health hazards are identified and evaluated, the appropriate control techniques must be developed and installed. This requires the application of appropriate technology for reducing workplace exposures. 

The environmental control of particle suspensions from industrial practice is an important aspect of aerosol technology. Control of industrial aerosols is doneboth in the workplace to preserve safe conditions and at the exit exhaust stack to minimize the pollution of ambient air. In general, a variety of regulations govern industrial operations. 

Guide to Chemical Hazards (NIOSH 2005). The RELs are intended to be based on human and/or animal data, as well as on the consideration of technological feasibility for controlling workplace exposures to the REL. .. [whereas] [ujnder the old policy, RELs for most carcinogens were nonquantitative values labeled lowest feasible concentration (EEC) (NIOSH 2005). However, the paucity of recent cancer potency evaluations or updates makes it appear that this is not a NIOSH priority (NIOSH 2008). 

R. A. Shanley, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Water Pollution Control Policy, Presidential Studies Quarterly, vol. 18, pp. 319—330 (1988) L. B. Dworsky, Conservation in the United States, A Documentary History Pollution (New York, Chelsea House, 1971), p. 21 Office of Technology Assessment, Preventing Illness and Injury in the Workplace, Report OTA-H-256, April 1985, p. 211 R. C. Williams, The United States Public Health Service, 7798-1950 (Washington, D.C., Commissioned Officers Association of the United States Public Health Service, 1951), pp. 167, 279-282, 313-320, 535-537. 

---