Wavelength quantum mechanical model

Now that we ve seen how atomic structure is described according to the quantum mechanical model, let s return briefly to the subject of atomic line spectra first mentioned in Section 5.3. How does the quantum mechanical model account for the discrete wavelengths of light found in a line spectrum ... 

Why Do Microphases Form The most simple quantum mechanical model of a metal is a box with only one finite dimension. The walls are infinite barriers, so an electron inside has no chance to escape. This model accepts only those electron energies which correspond to electronhalf-wavelengths which are simple fractions of the box size. Metal electrons may fill part of these energy levels with two electrons per level. The upper level of energy reached is called the Fermi level. A smooth U-shaped curve of energy vs. wave number includes all acceptable energies in this model. 

Bohr postulated circular orbits for the electrons in an atom and developed a mathematical model to represent the energies of the orbits, as well as then-distances from the atom s nucleus. His model worked very well for the hydrogen atom. It could be used to calculate the energy of the emitted and absorbed light, as well as the radius of the atom. However, the intensity of the various wavelengths of fight involved was not explained well. Moreover, no other atom was explained well at all. Bohr s theory has since been replaced by a quantum mechanical model, but it was a milestone because Bohr was the first to postulate energy levels in atoms. 

Here we present a quantum mechanical model to calculate the experimentally observed interference patterns [3,5]. We include two-dimensional potential fluctuations, temperature effects as well as the back-scattering from the potential fluctuations. The latter effect alters the interference patterns strongly when the scattering center is located close (within the phase coherence length) to the sample boundaries. Constructive and deconstructive interference arise when the position of the scattering potential in the direction of the detector QPC is changed by 1/4 of the Fermi wavelength. 

One of the most important ramifications of the uncertainty principle is that it brought about a radical change in the philosophy of science. Classical mechanics was deterministic in nature that is to say that if the precise position and momentum of a particle or a collection of particles were known, Nev/ton s laws could be used (at least in principle) to determine all the future behavior of the particle(s). The uncertainty principle, however, tells us that there is an inherent limitation to how accurately we can measure the two quantities simultaneously. Any observation of an extremely small object (one whose wavelength is on the same magnitude or larger than the particle itself) necessarily effects a nonnegligible disturbance to the system, and thereby it influences the results. Einstein never liked the statistical nature of quantum mechanics, saying God does not play dice with the universe. Nonetheless, the quantum mechanical model is a statistical one. 

The group velocity of de Broglie matter waves are seen to be identical with particle velocity. In this instance it is the wave model that seems not to need the particle concept. However, this result has been considered of academic interest only because of the dispersion of wave packets. Still, it cannot be accidental that wave packets have so many properties in common with quantum-mechanical particles and maybe the concept was abandoned prematurely. What it lacks is a mechanism to account for the appearance of mass, charge and spin, but this may not be an insurmountable problem. It is tempting to associate the rapidly oscillating component with the Compton wavelength and relativistic motion within the electronic wave packet. 

Thus, the wavelength-frequency relation (2.1) implies the Compton-effect formula (2.10). The best we can do is to describe the phenomena constituting the wave-particle duality. There is no widely accepted explanation in terms of everyday experience and common sense. Feynman referred to the experiment with two holes as the central mystery of quantum mechanics. It should be mentioned that a number of models have been proposed over the years to rationalize these quantum mysteries. Bohm proposed that there might exist hidden variables whieh would make the behavior of each photon deterministic, i.e., particle-like. Everett and Wheeler proposed the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics in which each random event causes the splitting of the entire universe into disconnected parallel universes in whieh eaeh possibility becomes the reality. 

The quantum mechanical interpretation of the width of the natural spectral line should be based on this relation, in which the physical quantities A and A t =/3 1 have a precise meaning. In our model, the natural line width occurs at wavelength A and can be calculated as... 

There is no allowance in this model for more than one electron. Some researchers tried to accommodate the extra electrons by using elliptical orbits, but that didn t work. How do we know it failed We could use the same criterion we used for hydrogen. The question to ask is Can we reproduce the experimental spectrum For multi-electron atoms there are far too many lines of nearly the same wavelength. The Bohr model cannot predict the occurrence of these transitions. We need a new model the new quantum mechanics. We shall use a formulation due to Schrodinger. 

---