Velocity radial growth

Figure 5.9 shows the time evolution of the radii of selected 2D spherulites from Fig. 5.8. We observe that the process is non-linear and accelerated, (fR/df > 0. It is also interesting to notice that, at a given time, the radial growth velocity Ur = dR/dt (slope) is nearly the same for all spherulites, which implies that it depends on the deposition time and certainly not on the radius of the spherulites. In the case discussed here the thickness of the film is increasing with time because of continuous exposure to the molecular beam. The non-linearity is more pronounced at the beginning of the experiment (roughly between 250 and 350 s) and the velocity nearly tends towards an asymptotic value, so that 2D spherulites that are formed last show almost linear growth.

In neurons, microtubules are responsible for axonal transport and longitudinal axon growth, while neurofilaments are related to radial growth, so that axonal diameter (and thus conduction velocity) are roughly proportional to neurofilament content. Type V IFs are the lamins associated with the nuclear membrane. Actin, tubulin, and several of the intermediate filament proteins are found in all cells. 

Fig. 19. Dependence of the (2D) radial growth velocity on deposition temperature for various bath compositions.

Growth in the radial direction is assumed to occur at a constant velocity. There is ample experimental justification for this in the case of three-dimensional spherical growth. 

FORSTER and ZUBER(85,86J who employed a similar basic approach, although the radial rate of growth dr/dt was used for the bubble velocity in the Reynolds group, showed that ... 

The radial velocities have been computed with the low resolution set-up (more spectral lines, no telluric line), using a cross-correlation technique. When excluding the seven outliers, the peak in centered at 83.0 0.4kms 1 with a dispersion of 1.9 0.2kms 1. Lithium abundance is being determined using Li i 6707.8 A. We used the B — V index to determined the ([3]), and the curve of growth from [7] to derive AT(Li). 

The radial velocity (bubble rate of growth) will decrease with increasing pressure. This has nothing to do with rate of nucleation. The rate of nucleation may increase or decrease with pressure as far as this equation is concerned. 

The radial velocity is seen to be directly proportional to the temperature driving force and inversely proportional to the square root of the elapsed time of growth. On the other hand the bubble radius is proportional to the temperature driving force and to the direct square root of the time. The interesting result is that the product of the bubble radius and its radial velocity is independent of time. 

Assuming that atomization is caused by aerodynamic surface wave growth, Ranz (37) predicted the spreading angle, 0, of the atomizing jet by relating the radial velocity of the unstable surface waves to the axial injection velocity... 

Subsonic evaporation waves can be combined with a simple similarity solution to the radial continuity and momentum equations to obtain [13] an idealized model for rapid bubble growth in superheated liquids. This model is based on the experimental observations [1,2,5] that the bubble radial velocity and evaporative mass fiux are approximately constant for the explosive boiling mode of evaporation near the superheat limit. 

Figure 5. Schematic of the postulated similarity fiowfield for the steady growth of a liquid-vapor mixture bubble within a superheated liquid. Radial variation of pressure is shown for a bubble radial velocity of 147.1 m/s in water superheated to the spinodal point of 600 K and 2.89 MPa. The bubble velocity corresponds to an evaporation wave velocity of 72.85 m/s, slightly above the CJ velocity of 67.7 m/s but below the maximum velocity of 78.5 m/s.

---