Valence bond theory basic concepts

Note to the student The AP chemistry exam does not emphasize complex ions or coordination compounds. There is nothing on the AP exam that involves the concepts of crystal-field theory, low versus high spin, valence bond theory, or other related areas. If you understand the questions presented here, then you are basically "safe" in this area of the exam. Most high school AP chemistry programs do not focus much on this area of chemistry because of time constraints. 

The first point to be made concerning acids and bases is that so-called acid-base theories are in reality definitions of what an acid or base is they are not theories in the sense of valence bond theory or molecular orbital theory. In a very real sense, we can make an acid be anything we wish the differences between the various acid-base concepts are not concerned with which is right but which is most convenient to use in a particular situation. All of the current definitions of acid-base behavior are compatible with each other. In fact, one of the objects in the following presentation of many different definitions is to emphasize their basic parallelism and hence to direct the students toward a cosmopolitan attitude toward acids and bases which will stand them in good stead in dealing with various chemical situations, whether they be in aqueous solutions of ions, organic reactions, nonaqueotis titrations, or other situations. 

The main features of the chemical bonding formed by electron pairs were captured in the early days of quantum mechanics by Heitler and London. Their model, which came to be known, as the valence bond (VB) model in its later versions, will serve as our basic tool for developing potential surfaces for molecules undergoing chemical reactions. Here we will review the basic concepts of VB theory and give examples of potential surfaces for bond-breaking processes. 

In practice, the valence bond picture has probably exerted more influence on how chemists actually think than the HMO picture. However most early applications were primarily qualitative in nature. This qualitative VB picture can be summarized under die name of resonance theory [10]. The basic concept is that in general the more ways one has of arranging the spin pairing in the VB wave function, the more stable the molecule is likely to be. Thus, VB theory predicts that phenanthrene with 14 carbon atoms and 5 Kekule structures should be more stable than anthracene with 14 carbon atoms but just 4 Kekule structures, in complete accord with the experimental evidence. It also predicts that benzenoid hydrocarbons with no Kekule structures should be unstable and highly reactive, and in fact no such compounds are knowa Extensions of this qualitative picture appear, for example, in Clar s ideas of resonant sextets [11], which seem to be very powerful in rationalizing much of the chemistry of benzenoid aromatic hydrocarbons. The early ascendancy of HMO theory was thus largely based on the ease with which it could be used for quantitative computations rather than on any inherent superiority of its fundamental assumptions. 

The molecular orbital (MO) is the basic concept in contemporary quantum chemistry. " It is used to describe the electronic structure of molecular systems in almost all models, ranging from simple Hiickel theory to the most advanced multiconfigurational treatments. Only in valence bond (VB) theory is it not used. Here, polarized atomic orbitals are instead the basic feature. One might ask why MOs have become the key concept in molecular electronic structure theory. There are several reasons, but the most important is most likely the computational advantages of MO theory compared to the alternative VB approach. The first quantum mechanical calculation on a molecule was the Heitler-London study of H2 and this was the start of VB theory. It was found, however, that this approach led to complex structures of the wave funetion when applied to many-electron systems and the mainstream of quantum ehemistry was to take another route, based on the success of the central-field model for atoms introduced by by Hartree in 1928 and developed into what we today know as the Hartree-Foek (HF) method, by Fock, Slater, and co-workers (see Ref. 5 for a review of the HF method for atoms). It was found in these calculations of atomic orbitals that a surprisingly accurate description of the electronic structure could be achieved by assuming that the electrons move independently of each other in the mean field created by the electron cloud. Some correlation was introduced between electrons with... 

---