Unspecific binding determination

Some of the polyclonal antibodies or the antibodies produced by the animal before the immunization might cause unspecific bindings. To control this, it is important to obtain a preimmune bleed from the same animal. The preimmune serum should also be used as a guide in the initial experiments to determine the dilution of the antibody, and later on... 

Determination of unspecific binding reaction by competition of the RNA aptamers with cocaine 79 pi incubation buffer, 10 pi nAChR-enriched plasma membranes (800 pg/ml protein 1.6 pM receptor), 1 pi P-RNA dilution containing 10 mg/ml t-RNA anti-RNAse (40 U/pl), and 10 pi cocaine (10 mM). The percentage of binding of the ( P) RNA aptamers to the... 

A common analytical problem in immunoassays is that of cross-reactivity, which is the unspecific binding of the therapeutic antibodies determined in the assay with a second (or more) antigen(s). These interfering bindings must be kept to a minimum. Among other factors, specificity of the enzyme-labeled anti-Fc and anti-Fab antibodies used for detection is of major importance. In general, each assay design bears its special drawbacks that must be carefully evaluated for its intended use. 

The structure of I19L was determined in aqueous solution at pH 6.8 by NMR [142]. Chemical shift values and the scarcity of cross-peaks in NOESY and ROESY spectra indicated that the peptide is mostly disordered in solution, although it has a helical propensity at residues 10-14 (Fig. 36). The bound conformation was investigated by means of tr-NOESY and STD experiments using a 30 1 excess of peptide relative to tubulin. The presence of intense, negative crosspeaks in the tr-NOESY spectrum proved that there is a fast binding equilibrium (Fig. 36). Unspecific binding was ruled out based on the absence of tr-NOE peaks in a control experiment where the protein was BSA instead of tubulin. The existence... 

The simplest way of fraction separation, however, is when one of the immunoreactants (i.e., either the antigen or the antibody) is immobilized on a solid phase, i.e., immunoreagent modified solid-phase separations, such as plastic tubes, microtitre plate, latex-, glass- or magnetic beads, dipsticks or nitrocellulose membranes [121]. The efl ciency of separation is determined by the nature of the solid surface. Unspecific binding of the label to the solid phase can occur, especially when the latter has hydrophobic properties [96]. The adsorption of the antibody to the solid surface causes its partial inactivation, which can explain some unexpected effects when comparing the same antibody used in liquid and solid-phase systems (see also Section 9.3.4.4). 

Add 5 pi unlabeled 200 pM GTPyS to two additional wells in order to determine unspecific binding. 

In order to reveal their binding kinetics, the interaction between several MAG-antagonists and MAG was analyzed by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) experiments [94—96] (Table 9). For this purpose, MAG< i.3-Fc [58] was immobilized on a CMS dextrane chip containing either a surface of covalently bound Fc-specific goat antihuman IgG antibody or protein A. A reference cell providing only the IgG antibody or protein A was used to compensate for unspecific binding to the matrix. Affinities ( Td) as well as association ( on) and dissociation rate constants (A o f) were determined [70, 82]. 

The main difficulty with this technology is the possible interaction of target and/or ap tamer with the chip surface. The nature of this difficulty may be high unspecific interaction or high repulsion. For this reason, the most suitable sensor chip surface and optimal binding conditions must be determined for every target/aptamer combination. 

There is a tendency for Vss and Vc to correlate one with another, which implies that the volume of distribution is predominantly determined by distribution in the vascular and interstitial space as well as unspecific protein binding in these distribution spaces. The distribution rate is inversely correlated with molecular size and is similar to that of inert polysaccharides, suggesting that passive diffusion through aqueous channels is the primary distribution mechanism [57]. 

Since the atom connectivities of the individual building blocks are already known from their spectroscopic characterization, the task for the supramolecular chemist is to determine the secondary structure of the noncovalent complexes formed from these building blocks. Is the binding interaction between different building blocks specific or is there some unspecific complexation observed Is the guest molecule really inside of the cavity of a capsule or does it prefer a different location, for example, does it stick to the outside Is one part really threaded through the other in a mechanically bound molecule What is the topology of such a complex How are the parts oriented relative to one another in the whole complex These are the questions to be answered. 

Figure 7. Maltose binding to immobilized anti-maltose antibody is shown. The concentration of maltose ranges over 5.8-1500 nM with duplicate injections of each concentration. Depicted are the binding signals after subtraction of the background response measured on a surface, which was coated with an unspecific antibody. Affinity determination was done by fitting data from the Plot of equilibrium response Req) against concentration to the Langmuir 1 1 binding isotherm using BIA evaluation software 3.0.

---