Univariate model

We now consider the case in which, again, the independent variable jc, is considered to be accurately known, but now we suppose that the variances in the dependent variable y, are not constant, but may vary (either randomly or continuously) with JC . To show the basis of the method we use the simple linear univariate model, written as Eq. (2-76). 

Depending on the data structure, different types of models are possible to be applied for data analysis. Thus, when data are ordered in one direction, linear univariant models can be applied (see (1)), and nonlinear models as well (see (2)). For data ordered in two directions, bilinear models can be applied (see (3)) or nonbilinear models. Finally, for data ordered in three directions, trilinear models can be applied (see (4)) or, failing that, nontrilinear models. 

The next step is to construct the regression model from the calibration data using one ariable plus an intercept. Tlie results of this (now univariate) model (see Table 5.10) indicate that the intercept is not a significant term in the regression. This is expected because the data are known to obey Beer s Law. Traditionally, in statistics the intercept term is left in the model even when found to be nonsignificant. 

Nevertheless, obtaining a calibration model with a good fit for the calibration samples is not an indication that the model will be useful for predicting future samples. The more factors are considered in the PLS model, the better is the fit, although, probably, the prediction of new samples is worse. Hence another set of known samples, the validation set, is required to test the models. This can be a small group of samples prepared within the overall domain of the calibration samples (remember that extrapolation is not allowed in regression models, not even in the univariate models), with different concentrations of the analyte (we want to test that the model quantifies it correctly) and different concentrations of the concomitants. Then, if the predictions are good, we can be reasonably sure that the model can avoid the undesirable influence of the concomitants. 

In Sections 5.2.1 and 5.2.2, it was stated that the samples must be matrix-effect-free for univariate models, e.g., inter- and intramolecular interactions must not be present. The standard addition method can be used to correct sample matrix effects. It should be noted that most descriptions of the standard addition method in the literature use a model form, where the instrument response signifies the dependent variable, and... 

As the procedure consists in the evaluation of the quality of all the models with one variable (i.e. p univariate models), of all the models with two variables [i.e. p X (p - 1) bivariate models], up to all the possible models with k variables, the greatest disadvantage of this method is the extraordinary increase in the required computer time when p and k are quite large. In fact, the total number t of models is given by the relationship ... 

The regression model vs. actual results scatter plot is shown in Figure 10 and the plot of residuals (y/ - ft) in Figure 11. Despite the apparent high correlation between tryptophan concentration and A12, the univariate model is a poor predictor, particularly at low concentrations. 

Although the bivariate model performs considerably better than the univariate model, as evidenced by the smaller residuals, the calibration might be improved further by including more spectral data. The question arises as to which data to include. In the limit of course, all data will be used and the model takes the form... 

By a more elaborate, but equally misleading, one-variable-at-a time analysis, viz. to use an hypothesized reaction mechanism to derive the optimum conditions from physical chemical models. Such models are as a rule univariate models, and as such they cannot account for interaction effects. 

In this section we describe the six discrete probability distributions and five continuous probability distributions that occur most frequently in bioinformatics and computational biology. These are called univariate models. In the last three sections, we discuss probability models that involve more than one random variable called multivariate models. 

The specified number and character of performance parameters and variables, i.c.. the operational conditions, is defined as a /ev/mg domain. Simple domains for any project may require only a univariate model, while complex project measurement systems may require multivariate models. Some projects may have multiple response parameters, each of which may require a multivariate (independent) variable model The calibration and validation operations are discussed below in Section 2.3. 

Case 1. The univariate model considered by Keith et al. (2008) is the target FCD under study,/, given in Equation... 

Univariate Forecasts of a given variable demand are based on a model fitted only to present and past observations of a given time series. There are several different univariate models, like Extrapolation of Trend Curves, Simple Exponential Smoothing, Holt Method, Holt-Winters Method, Box-Jenkins Procedure, and Stepwise Auto-regression, which can be regarded as a subset of the Box-Jenkins Procedure. 

Do multivariate models provide a better prediction than univariate models based solely on impact speed ... 

A possible violation of constraint 2 has several causes. The binary logistic models can deliver extreme values when one or more factors entered have extreme values. In other words, the prediction on the boundaries of the models can lead to implausible results with respect to constraint 2. The reason for this is not the multiplicity of factors within the models (compared to univariate models), but the proximity of outcome variables. 

The second research question refers to the expected advantage of multivariate compared to univariate modeling. To this end, univariate models for ISS and fatalities have been constructed using impact speed as single explanatory variable. The models for GIDAS are summarized in Table 5.21. The corresponding results for PCDS are summarized in Table 5.22 (note that impact speed was scaled differently for the PCDS data, see Sect. 5.2.3). 

Tables 5.23 and 5.24 give the ROC AUC for the univariate models for GIDAS and PCDS. The in-sample and out-of-sample predictive accuracy of the models is high. Regarding the latter one, the models derived from PCDS tend to be more accurate. The optimism is very small (<0.002). One-sided t-tests were used to evaluate the differences between cross-validated multivariate models (as given in Tables 5.15 and 5.20 ) and the corresponding univariate models.

Due to this fact, there are some mathematical enhancements that can be applied to data that are to be used in a multivariate model that would render it useless for a univariate model. The purpose of these algorithms is to remove redundant information and enhance the important sample-to-sample differences that exist within the data. 

ARIMA is a sophisticated univariate modeling technique. ARIMA is the abbreviation of Autoregressive integrated moving average (also known as the Box-Jenkins model). It was developed in 1970 for forecasting purposes and relies solely on the past behavior of the variable being forecasted. The model creates the value of F, with input from previous values of the same dataset. This input includes a factor of previous values as well as the elasticity of the... 

---