Uniaxis assembly

Samples are most frequently shock deformed under laboratory conditions utilizing either explosive or gun-launched flyer (driver) plates. Given sufficient lateral extent and assembly thickness, a sample may be shocked in a onedimensional strain manner such that the sample experiences concurrently uniaxial-strain loading and unloading. Based on the reproducibility of projectile launch velocity and impact planarity, convenience of use, and ability to perform controlled oblique impact (such as for pressure-shear studies) guns have become the method of choice for many material equation-of-state and shock-recovery studies [21], [22]. 

The parameters K1/ K2/ and K3 are defined by the refractive indices of the crystal and sample and by the incidence angle [32]. If the sample has uniaxial symmetry, only two polarized spectra are necessary to characterize the orientation. If the optical axis is along the plane of the sample, such as for stretched polymer films, only the two s-polarized spectra are needed to determine kz and kx. These are then used to calculate a dichroic ratio or a P2) value with Equation (25) (replacing absorbance with absorption index). In contrast, a uniaxial sample with its optical axis perpendicular to the crystal surface requires the acquisition of spectra with both p- and s-polarizations, but the Z- and X-axes are now equivalent. This approach was used, through dichroic ratio measurements, to monitor the orientation of polymer chains at various depths during the drying of latex [33]. This type of symmetry is often encountered in non-polymeric samples, for instance, in ultrathin films of lipids or self-assembled monolayers. 

At the end of the sixties, Godovsky 64 71> developed a fully automatic deformation microcalorimeter based on the Tiang-Calvet principle for simultaneous recording of thermomechanical behaviour of rubbers and solids (films, fibres) at uniaxial deformation. The device consists of two parts a microcalorimeter and a mechanical loading system with dynamometric assembly. The differential microcalorimeter includes the working and the reference cells. The temperature difference between the... 

In order to evaluate quantitatively the orientation of vibrational modes from the dichroic ratio in molecular films, we assume a uniaxial distribution of transition dipole moments in respect to the surface normal, (z-axis in Figure 1). This assumption is reasonable for a crystalline-like, regularly ordered monolayer assembly. An alternative, although more complex model is to assume uniaxial symmetry of transition dipole moments about the molecular axis, which itself is tilted (and uniaxially symmetric) with respect to the z-axis. As monolayers become more liquid-like, this may become a progressively more valid model (8,9). We define < > as the angle between the transition dipole moment M and the surface normal (note that 0° electric field of the evenescent wave (2,10), in the ATR experiment are given by equations 3-5 (8). 

In Sections 4.4 and 4.5, we dealt briefly with particulate flow instabilities in hoppers and the nonhomogeneous stress distributions created under uniaxial loading of a particulate assembly. In this section, we will expand on the discrete nature of such assemblies, and refer the reader to the computational and experimental tools that have been developed, and are rapidly advancing, to study such phenomena. 

To summarize this part of the chapter, we have constructed a consistent theory of linear and cubic dynamic susceptibilities of a noninteracting superparamagnetic system with uniaxial particle anisotropy. The scheme developed was specified for consideration of the assemblies with random axis distribution but may be easily extended for any other type of the orientational order imposed on the particle anisotropy axes. A proposed simple approximation is shown to be capable of successful replacement of the results of numerical calculations. 

A consistent study of the linear and lowest nonlinear (quadratic) susceptibilities of a superparamagnetic system subjected to a constant (bias) field is presented. The particles forming the assembly are assumed to be uniaxial and identical. The method of study is mainly the numerical solution (which may be carried out with any given accuracy) of the Fokker-Planck equation for the orientational distribution function of the particle magnetic moment. Besides that, a simple heuristic expression for the quadratic response based on the effective relaxation... 

In Section IV.B a procedure of numerical solution for Eq. (4.329) is described and enables us to obtain the linear and cubic dynamic susceptibilities for a solid system of uniaxial fine particles. Then, with allowance for the polydispersity of real samples, the model is applied for interpreting the magnetodynamic measurements done on Co-Cu composites [64], and a fairly good agreement is demonstrated. In our work we have proposed for the low-frequency cubic susceptibility of a randomly oriented particle assembly an interpolation (appropriate in the whole temperature range) formula... 

Figure I Schematic representation of an example of hierarchical self-assembly at microscopic, mesoscopic, and macroscopic levels. At the microscopic level, molecules assemble into supramolecular polymer-like assemblies. This involves conformational changes to the monomer units that themselves are complex molecules. The polymers assemble into bundles at mesoscopic levels that under appropriate conditions spontaneously align macroscopically along some preferred direction to form a uniaxial nematic liquid-crystalline phase (after Aggeli et al., 2001).

Che et al. 215) extended the assembly into aqueous environments, describing the preparation of supramolecular polyelectrolytes by self-organization of cationic organoplatinmn (II) complexes in water through extended Pt- Pt and hydrophobic interactions (Fig. 13). Aligned films and discrete uniaxial microfibers with cofacial molecular orientations were readily produced with these phosphorescent viscoelastic mesophases. 

---