Uncertain mappings

At present, the calculation and mapping of critical loads for heavy metals is only at the beginning and in Europe there are only a few examples of application of methods described in Section 3.2. We will refer to case studies from Germany and Russia as the most characteristic research in this direction. The typical endpoints in these calculations refer to critical concentrations of different heavy metals in the ecosystems. The determination of the given critical concentrations is still uncertain and the relevant risk assessment calculated as an exceedance of critical loads should be based on selecting values of critical concentrations (see 3.2.2). 

Like most of the people whose voices you will hear in this book, I am on an uncertain journey. It is easy to get horribly lost. There are no maps. You re driving on dimly lit and poorly marked roads that require constant guesses about which turns to take. Unsettling detours are the norm. The trip is exhausting and you never quite know how far you have traveled. You hope to get to a healthy place, but you re not sure where it is, whether you ll ever arrive, or even whether that destination exists for you. 

The terrestrial drainage basin for each lake was digitized from 1 24,000 U. S. Geological Survey topographical maps. The reported values (which exclude lake surface area) represent the average of two estimates, one that includes and one that excludes small wetlands with internal drainage and areas where watershed boundaries were uncertain. 

Fig. 4. Superimposed maps of the neutral hydrogen distribution in the Galaxy as interpreted by Kerr and by Weaver. The points marked L denote regions that Kerr interprets as markedly deficient in neutral hydrogen. Dashed lines and hatched areas indicate where the location is uncertain, not regions where the hydrogen is weak or strong. The radius of the solar circle is 10 kpc. Galactic longitude is shown around the edge of the map...

The method of the uncertainty dimension was introduced in 1985 by Grebogi et al. Suppose we are given a fractal that can be covered by the interval [0,1]. Also, suppose that we are provided with a mapping function / that generates the fractal and determines the orbits of seeds xo in [0,1]. Choose e > 0 and N = 1/e random points xj in [0,1]. Now, for every one of the N points determine its lifetime Ij. The lifetime is the number of times the seed xj can be iterated forward with / without ionizing it. Then, for every Xj determine the lifetimes of Xj + e and Xj — e. Call them Ij and lj respectively. For Ij = Ij = lj the point Xj is called e certain. Otherwise, the point Xj is called e uncertain. This procedure measures the fraction of gaps in the fractal on a scale e. Define /(e) as the ratio of e uncertain points and the total number of points N. Then, /(e) is also called the uncertainty fraction. 

Uncertainty and disturbances can be described in terms of mathematical constraints defining a finite set of hounded regions for the allowable values of the uncertain parameters of the model and the parameters defining the disturbances. If uncertainty or disturbances were unbounded, it would not make sense to try to ensure satisfaction of performance requirements for all possible plant parameters and disturbances. If the uncertainty cannot be related mathematically to model parameters, the model cannot adequately predict the effect of uncertainty on performance. The simplest form of description arises when the model is developed so that the uncertainty and disturbances can be mapped to independent, bounded variations on model parameters. This last stage is not essential to the method, but it does fit many process engineering problems and allows particularly efficient optimization methods to be deployed. Some parameter variations are naturally bounded e.g.. feed properties and measurement errors should be bounded by the quality specification of the supplier. Other parameter variations require a mixture of judgment and experiment to define, e.g., kinetic parameters. 

Figure 4. Isopach map of Meade Peak (left) and Retort (right) Members of the Phosphoria Formation contour interval is 10 m. Principal overthrust faults of the Sevier thrust belt indicated by barbed line isopachs and faults are dashed where uncertain.

Since production rates vary with time and place, the data on the figure are uncertain, but are consistent with satellite-derived maps of chlorophyll concentrations (see Plate 6.3, facing p. 138). These maps show that, on an annual basis, the short, high-production... 

Another method of reducing model bias is the omit map. A part of the model of which we are uncertain, such as a ligand or a loop region, is omitted from the model. The structure is then refined with this part left out and the phases calculated. The omitted part should nonetheless appear in the map, provided it is a real feature of the molecule. 

We frequently are interested in how confident or uncertain a student is of his or her problem-solving decisions. Uncertainty shows up in the second episode of Table 8.3. Here, the student vacillates back and forth, opening and closing the two diagrams of interest. This student eventually solved the problem without help, but she took a total of 68 mouse events to do so. This episode shows how the problem-solving records are useful for locating the points at which students were unsure of their solutions, demonstrated by shuttling repeatedly between two maps. 

This accounts for all 47 water molecules located by x-ray crystallography. The crystal contains an estimated 140 water molecules per asymmetric unit thus the locations of 90 additional water molecules are uncertain. The map of Figure 1 suggests where these water molecules are to be found more than half of them in the large cavity and the remainder in the three smaller cavities. Only very few of the missing water molecules are expected in parts of the narrow channels where no water molecule has been located crystallographically. 

---