Typical jump diffusion

Fig. 4 The Q dependence of the intermediate component /2, for propane in Na-Y showing a typical jump diffusion at three different temperatures. The curves are the fits of different models to the MD data. Adapted from [19]...

A) and typical jump frequencies ranging from lO to 10 per second. These and other fiee-voiume theories are described in more detail in Crank and Park (S). The important concept that is central to all free-volume theories is that diffusion occurs in polymers through free volume obtained by minor displacements of side groups or segments of the chain but without net translational displacement of the center of mass of the polymer. 

Table 1. Summary of the simulation results for the calculation of the nucleation rate for monodisperse hard sphere coUoids. Here (j) is the volume fraction of the liquid phase. AG is the measured free energy to form a cluster of critical size ric. /Do is the attachment rate of particles to the critical cluster divided by the free diffusion coefficient. / = /

Micelles are extremely dynamic aggregates. Ultrasonic, temperature and pressure jump techniques have been employed to study various equilibrium constants. Rates of uptake of monomers into micellar aggregates are close to diffusion-controlled306. The residence times of the individual surfactant molecules in the aggregate are typically in the order of 1-10 microseconds307, whereas the lifetime of the micellar entity is about 1-100 miliseconds307. Factors that lower the critical micelle concentration usually increase the lifetimes of the micelles as well as the residence times of the surfactant molecules in the micelle. Due to these dynamics, the size and shape of micelles are subject to appreciable structural fluctuations. 

Pulsed field gradient (PFG)-NMR experiments have been employed in the groups of Zawodzinski and Kreuer to measure the self-diffusivity of water in the membrane as a function of the water content. From QENS, the typical time and length scales of the molecular motions can be evaluated. It was observed that water mobility increases with water content up to almost bulk-like values above T 10, where the water content A = nn o/ nsojH is defined as the ratio of the number of moles of water molecules per moles of acid head groups (-SO3H). In Perrin et al., QENS data for hydrated Nation were analyzed with a Gaussian model for localized translational diffusion. Typical sizes of confining domains and diffusion coefficients, as well as characteristic times for the elementary jump processes, were obtained as functions of A the results were discussed with respect to membrane structure and sorption characteristics. ... 

These authors were the first FGSE workers to make extensive use of the concept of free volume 42,44) and its effect on transport in polymer systems. That theory asserts that amorphous materials (liquids, polymers) above their glass transition temperature T contain unoccupied volume randomly distributed and in parcels of sufficient size to permit jumps of small molecules — and of polymer jumping segments — to take place. Since liquids have a fractional free volume fdil typically greater than that, f, of polymers, the diffusion rate both of diluent molecules and (uncrosslinked and unentangled) polymer molecules should increase with increasing diluent volume fraction vdi,. The Fujita-Doolittle expression 43) describes this effect quantitatively for the diluent diffusion ... 

In the limit as ftact the rate of reaction of encounter pairs is very fast. The Collins and Kimball [4] expression, eqn. (25), reduces to the Smoluchowski rate coefficient, eqn. (19). Naqvi et al. [38a] have pointed out that this is not strictly correct within the limits of the classical picture of a random walk with finite jump size and times. They note the first jump of the random walk occurs at a finite rate, so that both diffusion and crossing of the encounter surface leads to finite rate of reaction. Consequently, they imply that the ratio kactj TxRD cannot be much larger than 10 (when the mean jump distance is comparable with the root mean square jump distance and both are approximately 0.05 nm). Practically, this means that the Reii of eqn. (27) is within 10% of R, which will be experimentally undetectable. A more severe criticism notes that the diffusion equation is not valid for times when only several jumps have occurred, as Naqvi et al. [38b] have acknowledged (typically several picoseconds in mobile solvents). This is discussed in Sect. 6.8, Chap. 8 Sect 2.1 and Chaps. 11 and 12. Their comments, though interesting, are hardly pertinent, because chemical reactions cannot occur at infinite rates (see Chap. 8 Sect. 2.4). The limit kact °°is usually taken for operational convenience. 

The fundamental process in atomistic diffusion models is the thermally activated jump between neighboring sites of local minimum energy. The duration of any jump is typically very short compared to the particle s residence time in a minimum-energy site. Therefore, the average jump rate—the basis for any model of atomistic diffusive motion—is essentially inversely proportional to the average residence time. 

In a typical liquid, molecules jump randomly to one side or another about 1010 times per second in steps of about 3 A length. Calculate the diffusion coefficient for such molecules. (For liquids, D commonly ranges from 10 6 to 2 x 10-5 cm2/s.)... 

Additional deviations from the Nernst law [Eq. (4)] can come from kinetic effects in other words, if the potential scan is too fast to allow the system to reach thermal equilibrium. Two cases should be mentioned (1) ion transport limitation, and (2) electron transfer limitation. In case 1 the redox reaction is limited because the ions do not diffuse across the film fast enough to compensate for the charge at the rate of the electron transfers. This case is characterized by a square-root dependence of the current peak intensity versus scan rate Ik um instead of lk u. Since the time needed to cross the film, tCT, decreases as the square of the film thickness tCT d2, the transport limitation is avoided in thin films (typically, d < 1 xm for u < 100 mV/s). The limitation by the electron transfer kinetics (case 2) is more intrinsic to the polymer properties. It originates from the fact that the redox reaction is not instantaneous in particular, due to the fact that the electron transfer implies a jump over a potential barrier. If the scan... 

---