Two-way test

The chi-square distribution can be applied to other types of apph-catlon which are of an entirely different nature. These include apph-cations which are discussed under Goodness-of-Fit Test and Two-Way Test for Independence of Count Data. In these applications, the mathematical formulation and context are entirely different, but they do result in the same table of values. 

Two-Way Test for Independence for Count Data Procedure Nomenclature... 

There will be incidences when the foregoing assumptions for a two-tailed test will not be true. Perhaps some physical situation prevents p from ever being less than the hypothesized value it can only be equal or greater. No results would ever fall below the low end of the confidence interval only the upper end of the distribution is operative. Now random samples will exceed the upper bound only 2.5% of the time, not the 5% specified in two-tail testing. Thus, where the possible values are restricted, what was supposed to be a hypothesis test at the 95% confidence level is actually being performed at a 97.5% confidence level. Stated in another way, 95% of the population data lie within the interval below p + 1.65cr and 5% lie above. Of course, the opposite situation might also occur and only the lower end of the distribution is operative. 

Fire test methods attempt to provide correct information on the fire contribution of a product by exposing a small sample to conditions expected in a fire scenario. Methods can be viewed in two ways the first entails the strategy of the fire test, ignition resistance or low flammabiUty once ignited the second addresses the test specimen, a sample representative of the product or a sample of a material that might be used in the product. Fire science has progressed markedly since the older test methods were developed and it is known that the basis for many of these tests is doubthil. Results from older tests must be used with great care. 

This test should be conducted both before and after the HV test if this test is to be carried out. The test before the HV test ensure the quality of insulation and the test after the HV test checks that this has not deteriorated after the HV test. If the insulation resistance is found to be lower each circuit and component must be checked separately to identify the weak area and corrective steps taken to improve the resistance to the required level. The test can be conducted in two ways. 

The probability of the redundant system failing is the product of the single system time-dependent unavailability which includes approximately linearity between test and repair. There are two ways of performing the surveillance tests on these two systems sequential and staggered testing. 

FIGURE 11.4 Two-way analysis of variance. Arrangement of data in rows and columns such that each row of the cell culture plate (shown at the top of the figure) defines a single dose-response curve to the agonist. Also, data is arranged by plate in that each plate defines eight dose-response curves and the total data set is comprised of 32 dose-response curves. The possible effect of location with respect to row on the plate and/or which plate (order of plate analysis) can be tested with the two-way analysis of variance. 

The specimen is placed between heavy cylindrical brass electrodes, which carry electrical current during the test. There are two ways of running this test for dielectric strength. In the short-time test the voltage is increased from zero to breakdown at a uniform rate. The precise rate of voltage rise is specified in the governing material specifications. In the step-by-step test the initial... 

Other forms of ANOVA The simple ANOVA set out above tests for the presence of one unknown factor that produces (additive) differences between outwardly similar groups of measurements. Extensions of the concept allow one to simultaneously test for several factors (two-way ANOVA, etc.). The... 

However a new chemical discovery arises, an essential component of science is to explain that discovery on the basis of general principles. When a new general principle is posed, it is termed a hypothesis. A hypothesis is tentative until it can be confirmed in two ways. First, additional observations must be consistent with the hypothesis second, the hypothesis must predict new results that can be confirmed by experiments. If a hypothesis meets these tests, it is promoted to the status of a theory. A theory is a unifying principle that explains a collection of facts. 

The results of such multiple paired comparison tests are usually analyzed with Friedman s rank sum test [4] or with more sophisticated methods, e.g. the one using the Bradley-Terry model [5]. A good introduction to the theory and applications of paired comparison tests is David [6]. Since Friedman s rank sum test is based on less restrictive, ordering assumptions it is a robust alternative to two-way analysis of variance which rests upon the normality assumption. For each panellist (and presentation) the three products are scored, i.e. a product gets a score 1,2 or 3, when it is preferred twice, once or not at all, respectively. The rank scores are summed for each product i. One then tests the hypothesis that this result could be obtained under the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the three products and that the ranks were assigned randomly. Friedman s test statistic for this reads... 

---