Two- and Three- Dimensional Problems

The above applies largely to one-dimensional problems, but two-dimensional simulations are more and more the norm. All the methods described can be applied to these, but there are some sensible choices. For the ultramicrodisk electrode case, the present authors have recently done a detailed study and concluded [79] that one of the more useful transformations such as the Verbrugge/Baker [80] (see Chap. 12 for this and others) is best, combined with multipoint approximations (optimally using five or seven points), and either BI with extrapolation or BDF with the BI start. 

Another popular method (almost always with a transformation) is ADI, as this allows solution by a tridiagonal Thomas algorithm separately for the rows and columns. An ADI variant was also the choice for the three-dimensional problem of a rectangular electrode [81]. See Chap. 12 for more details. 

For more complex geometries in two- and three-dimensional space FEM or BEM might be a choice, especially if one has access to commercial FEM software such as ANSYS or COMSOL Multiphysics . In any case, for commercial packages, convergency tests are still necessary to gain insight into the quality of the simulation. 

a brief summary is given of all those methods that might be of interest, with their advantages and disadvantages, as seen by the present authors. References are not given, as they are provided in the sections of the book that are referred to. 

Box method Chap. 9, Sect. 9.1. This is the original electrochemical simulation method. With boxes, most of the above techniques can be applied. There is an unresolved issue of whether this method is inherently better than the point method, or not. 

---

In the finite element method, Petrov-Galerkin methods are used to minimize the unphysical oscillations. The Petrov-Galerkin method essentially adds a small amount of diffusion in the flow direction to smooth the unphysical oscillations. The amount of diffusion is usually proportional to Ax so that it becomes negligible as the mesh size is reduced. The value of the Petrov-Galerkin method lies in being able to obtain a smooth solution when the mesh size is large, so that the computation is feasible. This is not so crucial in one-dimensional problems, but it is essential in two- and three-dimensional problems and purely hyperbolic problems. 

Describe how one-dimensional transient solutions may be used for solution of two-and three-dimensional problems. 

Note that these analogies are less obvious in two- and three dimensional problems, however, because o is a tensor quantity with nine components, whereas jc and q are vectors with three components. 

Chemical engineering processes involve the transport and transfer of momentum, energy, and mass. Momentum transfer is another word for fluid flow, and most chemical processes involve pumps and compressors, and perhaps centrifuges and cyclone separators. Energy transfer is used to heat reacting streams, cool products, and run distillation columns. Mass transfer involves the separation of a mixture of chemicals into separate streams, possibly nearly pure streams of one component. These subjects were unified in 1960 in the first edition of the classic book. Transport Phenomena (Bird et al., 2002). This chapter shows how to solve transport problems that are one-dimensional that is, the solution is a function of one spatial dimension. Chapters 10 and 11 treat two- and three-dimensional problems. The one-dimensional problems lead to differential equations, which are solved using the computer. 

R — 0.0025 m. You must expand the differential equation because the one-dimensional option does not contain cylindrical geometry. (This hmitation is removed in two- and three-dimensional problems, but here a one-dimensional solution suffices.) So, rewrite Eq. (9.6) as... 

N. V. Kantartzis and T. D. Tsiboukis, A comparative study of the Berenger perfectly matched layer, the superabsorption technique and several higher-order ABC s for the FDTD algorithm in two and three dimensional problems, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 1460-1463, Mar. 1997.doi 10.1109/20.582535... 

Principle. The quantity, E (s), in transform space is analogous to the usual Young s modulus for a Unear elastic materials. Here, the Unear differential relation between stress and strain for a viscoelastic polymer has been transformed into a linear elastic relation between stress and strain in the transform space. It will be shown in the next chapter that the same result can be obtained from integral expressions of viscoelasticity without recourse to mechanical models, so that the result is general and not limited to use of a particular mechanical model. Therefore, the simple transform operation allows the solution of many viscoelastic boundary value problems using results from elementary solid mechanics and from more advanced elasticity approaches to solids such as two and three dimensional problems as well as plates, shells, etc. See Chapters 8 and 9 for more details on solving problems in the transform domain. 

From these examples, it is clear that known solutions in the theory of linear elasticity for two and three dimensional problems including plates and shells can be converted to viscoelastic solutions in the transform domain relatively easily and the solution in the time domain can be found by inversion. Using this method many problems of practical interest can be solved. It is appropriate to note that buckling problems are a special case and the same approach, if not used wisely, can lead to erroneous results. 

As we have mentioned elsewhere, the theorems and necessary integrals can be extended to two- and three-dimensional problems with remarkably little work, and the software programs anticipate those applications. 

---