Turbulent diffusion coefficient definition

Another explanation of the lithium gap in the Hyades could be found in terms of turbulent diffusion and nuclear destruction. Turbulence is definitely needed to explain the lithium abundance decrease in G stars. If this turbulence is due to the shear flow instability induced by meridional circulation (Baglin, Morel, Schatzman 1985, Zahn 1983), turbulence should also occur in F stars, which rotate more rapidly than G stars. Fig. 2 shows a comparison between the turbulent diffusion coefficient needed for lithium nuclear destruction and the one induced by turbulence. Li should indeed be destroyed in F stars This effect gives an alternative scenario to account for the Li gap in the Hyades. The fact that Li is normal in the hottest observed F stars could be due to their slow rotation. 

Equation 8.2 shows how the net flux density of substance depends on its diffusion coefficient, Dj, and on the difference in its concentration, Ac] 1, across a distance Sbl of the air. The net flux density Jj is toward regions of lower Cj, which requires the negative sign associated with the concentration gradient and otherwise is incorporated into the definition of Acyin Equation 8.2. We will specifically consider the diffusion of water vapor and C02 toward lower concentrations in this chapter. Also, we will assume that the same boundary layer thickness (Sbl) derived for heat transfer (Eqs. 7.10-7.16) applies for mass transfer, an example of the similarity principle. Outside Sbl is a region of air turbulence, where we will assume that the concentrations of gases are the same as in the bulk atmosphere (an assumption that we will remove in Chapter 9, Section 9.IB). Equation 8.2 indicates that Jj equals Acbl multiplied by a conductance, gbl, or divided by a resistance, rbl. 

Turbulent diffusivity is by nonzero wind speed the function of time, location, wind speed and meteorological conditions. The turbulent diffusivity is implemented to the model on the basis of Sutton s definition of coefficients of dispersion. Coefficients of dispersion Oj = (Ty, oi are dependent on atmospheric stability and distance from the source. 

I. Definition of mass-transfer coefficient. Since our understanding of turbulent flow is incomplete, we attempt to write the equations for turbulent diffusion in a manner similar to that for molecular diffusion. For turbulent mass transfer for constant c, Eq. (6.1-6) is... 

Bischoff and Levenspiel (B14) present some calculations using existing experimental data to check the above predictions about the radial coefficients. For turbulent flow in empty tubes, the data of Lynn et al. (L20) were numerically averaged across the tube, and fair agreement found with the data of Fig. 12. The same was done for the packed-bed data of Dorweiler and Fahien (D20) using velocity profile data of Schwartz and Smith (Sll), and then comparing with Fig. 11. Unfortunately, the scatter in the data precluded an accurate check of the predictions. In order to prove the relationships conclusively, more precise experimental work would be needed. Probably the best type of system for this would be one in laminar flow, since the radial and axial coefficients for the general dispersion model are definitely known each is the molecular diffusivity. 

In commercial absorption equipment, both the liquid and vapor are usually in turbulent flow and the effective stagnant film thickness AZ is not known. The common practice, therefore, is to rewrite (16-2) in terms of an empirical mass transfer (film) coefficient that replaces both the diffusivity and film thickness. Thus, by definition. 

---