Structure trial

Also, the result of any diffraction-based trial-and-error fitting is not necessarily unique it is always possible that there exists another untried structure that would give a better fit to experiment. Hence, a multi-teclmique approach that provides independent clues to the structure is very fniithil and common in surface science such clues include chemical composition, vibrational analysis and position restrictions implied by other structural methods. This can greatly restrict the number of trial structures which must be investigated. 

To measure the goodness of fit, and to quantify the structural determination, a reliability (i -factor) comparison is used. In comparing the data and simulation of the experiment for many trial structures, a minimum R factor can be found corresponding to the optimal structure. In this way atomic positions can be determined in favorable cases to within a few hundredths of an A, comparable to the accuracy achieved in Low-Energy Electron Diffraction (LEED). 

Sinee there are no methods whieh are guaranteed to loeate all TSs (short of mapping the whole surfaee, whieh is impossible for more than three or four variables), it is essentially impossible to prove that a TS does not exist. The failure to locate a TS eonnecting two minima may simply be due to the inability to generate a sufficiently good trial structure for NR methods, or interpolation methods converging to a TS not eonneeting the two desired minima. 

Generate thousands of trial structures. Minimize, run dynamics, and quench (reminimize) each trial structure. Analyze the final structures. 

The atomic arrangement within the unit cell is more difficult to determine than the cell dimensions. Trial structures deduced from these dimensions and a knowledge of the chain conformation,... 

Figure 13. Principle of direct methods using triplet relations. As shown in the lower right-hand image the trial structure eonsists of atoms which are located at the eomers of the unit eell. Aeeording to the Z2 formula (Sayre equation) a strict phase relation exists within a eertain set of three reflections (a triplet) with large normalized structure factor amplitudes Eu. Sueh a triplet or origin invariant sum is defined as hiEli + + h k h = 0 or hiEli +...

An E-map is computed for the best set and the peaks picked. We then use our knowledge of molecular dimensions and conformations to extract a trial structure. This is the first point at which chemical knowledge is used actively i.e. the direct methods procedure is model free until this point. The structure is completed and refined in the usual way. 

Figure 9.3 A histogram of the final / mim values for 100 trial structures for 1JC4 was made by dividing the range of the values (0.158-0.315) into 15 intervals (buckets) and counting the number of trials whose / min values fell into each bucket. The 29 trials in the two left buckets with the lowest / y fj values are solutions, and the trials in the buckets at the right are non-solutions.

After the crystal structure of the compound has been solved, or deduced, from the X-ray data, the initial parameters (atomic positions, bond lengths, and bond angles) are only approximate and have to be improved. The usual method employed is that of least-squares refinement, although electron-density difference-maps and trial-and-error procedures are also used. Electron-density difference-maps give the approximate difference between the actual structure and the trial structure. 

The EXAFS function is obtained from the X-ray absorption spectrum by subtracting the absorption due to the free atom. A Fourier transform of the EXAFS data gives a radial distribution function which shows the distribution of the neighbouring atoms as a function of internuclear distance from the absorbing atom. Shells of neighbours, known as coordination shells, surround the absorbing atom. Finally, the radial distribution function is fitted to a series of trial structural models until a structure which best fits the... 

Even though these methods have shown some success, they require that the box containing the trial structure have cyclic boundary conditions to keep the calculations to a manageable size. This imposes an artificial translational symmetry on the structure. If the results are to converge to the observed structure, the box should either have the size and shape of the observed unit cell or else it should be sufficiently large that a small crystal can spontaneously form within it. 

The elucidation of the crystal structures of polymers from their x-ray diffraction patterns is frequently a difficult and laborious task. The work usually proceeds by trial and error methods in which calculated intensities for likely structures are compared with the observed intensities of diffraction spots. Furthermore, x-ray fibre photographs often contain relatively few reflections and it is always possible that more than one structure may give a reasonable fit with the observed intensity data. Additional information which can be obtained from infrared spectra can often provide considerable help with both these difficulties and in particular many trial structures can be eliminated without recourse to time-consuming calculations of x-ray intensities. 

---