Treating the Interactions

Energy transfer in solution occurs through a dipole-dipole interaction of the emission dipole of an excited molecule (donor) and the absorptive moment of a unexcited molecule (acceptor). Forster<40) treated the interaction quantum mechanically and derived and expression for the rate of transfer between isolated stationary, homogeneously broadened donors and acceptors. Dexter(41) formulated the transfer rate using the Fermi golden rule and extended it to include quadrupole and higher transition moments in either the donor or the acceptor. Following the scheme of Dexter, the transfer rate for a specific transition is... 

This equation ignores interactions between the ions. The simplest way to treat the interactions is just to add them to this equation, and assume that the ions remain randomly arranged. Suppose U is the total interaction energy that a given ion would feel if all the other sites were full. When only a fraction x of the sites is occupied, it costs an extra energy Ux to add another ion to the lattice, so fi becomes... 

Vleck Hamiltonian—treats the interactions of effective electronic spins and dates back to the work of Dirac, Heisenberg, and Van Vleck (80-83). 

We denote the vibrational wave packet associated with electronic state i by (7,0 and fi2l is the transition dipole moment. Initially the system is in the vibrational ground state on Vt and treating the interaction with the field E[ v (t) within first-order perturbation theory gives the following expression for the nuclear wave packet on Vi-... 

Part of the difficulties encountered in comparing these two approaches results from the different ways in which they are used. The E-C approach treats the interaction of only two species ala time to the extent that the nonpolar solvents used in these studies minimize solvation effects, the results are comparable to gas-phase proton affinities. In contrast, the HSAB principle is usually applied to exchange or competition reactions of the sort ... 

It is convenient to treat the interaction of atomic electrons with an electromagnetic field in the framework of perturbation theory. 

These results show that including quantum mechanical electronic rearrangement in dynamics calculations of the configurations of water on a metal surface can reveal effects that are not present in classical models of the water metal interface which treat the interaction of water with the surface as a static, classical potential energy function. For example, in classical calculations of the behavior of models of water at a paladium surface the interaction with one water molecule with the surface had a similar on-top binding site, a clas-... 

The result states that it is justified to neglect the term A2 in equ. (8.5b) and to treat the interaction between an atom and an electromagnetic field by first-order perturbation theory. The interaction operator is then given by... 

Our derivation of Equations (2.1) and (2.2) follows very closely the presentation of Loudon (1983 ch.2). The basic concept is to describe the molecule quantum mechanically, the photon field classically, and to treat the interaction between them in first-order perturbation theory. 

Because field quantization falls outside the scope of the present text, the discussion here has been limited to properties of classical fields that follow from Lorentz and general nonabelian gauge invariance of the Lagrangian densities. Treating the interacting fermion field as a classical field allows derivation of symmetry properties and of conservation laws, but is necessarily restricted to a theory of an isolated single particle. When this is extended by field quantization, so that the field amplitude rjr becomes a sum of fermion annihilation operators, the theory becomes applicable to the real world of many fermions and of physical antiparticles, while many qualitative implications of classical gauge field theory remain valid. 

In this chapter, we discuss mostly the bonding in mononuclear homoleptic complexes ML using two simple models. The first, called crystal field theory (CFT), assumes that the bonding is ionic i.e., it treats the interaction between the metal ion (or atom) and ligands to be purely electrostatic. In contrast, the second model, namely the molecular orbital theory, assumes the bonding to be covalent. A comparison between these models will be made. 

Accordingly, a common further approximation for calculating the molecular orbitals tp, is to replace the Hel term containing the pair-wise electron-electron interactions by an effective potential that treats the interaction of a given electron with all other electrons in an average way. The resultant operator includes the one-electron terms of Hel ... 

It is possible to go beyond the dipole approximation in the length gauge and treat the interactions between higher multipoles with the field derivatives, which is relevant when the variation of the field with ry- cannot be neglected [3], However, we do not pursue these extensions here because, in all the applications discussed below, the dipole approximation will be found to suffice. Equations (1.50), (1.51), and (1.52) are the central expressions used below to describe molecule-light interactions. Extensions of this approach to include quantization of the electromagnetic field are described in Chapter 12. 

Suppose that we were to average out the effects of all of the solvent molecules, effectively integrating over the coordinates describing the solvent molecules. This would dramatically simplify the description of the solvent molecules, and thereby simplify the computation of the energy of the solute-solvent system. This is the general principle behind the implicit solvent models. The solvent is described by a single term, its dielectric constant, and we just need to treat the interaction of the solute with this field. 

The difficulty in computing the wavefunction, structure, energy, and properties of the benzynes is how to properly treat the interaction between the two separated electrons. If the interaction between them is strong, a single configuration describing... 

Equation (4.4) will be broadly useftil it describes the effects of 1>q, and the physical perspective that we follow here is that the van der Waals approach treats the interactions as a perturbation. To analyze this further we introduce the probability density function... 

We treat the interaction between two parallel similar plates placed at x = 0 and h (Fig. 9.6) (i.e., the plates are at separation h) for the case where i/tq remains constant during interaction. The boundary conditions are... 

Before considering the interaction between two ion-penetrable membranes, we here treat the interaction between two similar ion-impenetrable hard plates 1 and 2 carrying surface charge density cr at separation h in a salt-free medium containing counterions only (Fig. 18.1) [2]. We take an x-axis perpendicular to the plates with its origin on the surface of plate 1. As a result of the symmetry of the system, we need consider only the region 0 < x < h 2. Let the average number density and the valence of counterions be o and z, respectively. Then we have from electroneutrality condition that... 

The Eddy Dissipation Concept (EDC) is used for treating the interaction between turbulence and chemistry in flames 12]. The method is based on a detailed description of the dissipation of turbulent eddies. In the EDC the total space is subdivided into a reaction space, called the fine structures and the surrounding fluid. In the presented reaction scheme the reactions Cl, C2, and C3 arc treated as taking place only in these fine structures, i.e. only on the smallest turbulent length scales. 

In order to obtain a theoretical expression for the oscillator strength, perturbation theory may be used to treat the interaction between electromagnetic radiation and the molecule. Since an oscillating field is a perturbation that varies in time, time-dependent perturbation theory has to be used. Thus, the Hamiltonian of the perturbed system is = 0) +... 

The problems for quantum chemists in the mid-forties were how to improve the methods of describing the electronic structure of molecules, valence theory, properties of the low excited states of small molecules, particularly aromatic hydrocarbons, and the theory of reactions. It seemed that the physics needed was by then all to hand. Quantum mechanics had been applied by Heitler, London, Slater and Pauling, and by Hund, Mulliken and Hiickei and others to the electronic structure of molecules, and there was a good basis in statistical mechanics. Although quantum electrodynamics had not yet been developed in a form convenient for treating the interaction of radiation with slow moving electrons in molecules, there were semi-classical methods that were adequate in many cases. 

---