Trayed towers control

The feed rate is manually set as required for either pH or reactant stoichiometry control. Soda ash is added to the fourth reactor as sodium makeup. Reactor effluent slurry flows by gravity to the thickener centerwell. Clarified liquor overflows from the thickener to the forward feed hold tank from which it is pumped to the tray tower. A horizontal belt filter is used for further dewatering of the thickener underflow solids. 

A malfunctioning high-temperature furnace trip caused a major tray upset in a large ethylbenzene fractionator. Figure 17-3 shows the tower control system. When the circulation pump briefly failed, the flow of hot vapor to the tower was interrupted. The tower temperature controller was called for more heat, and furnace fuel firing consequently increased. At this point, the automatic furnace shutdown system should have tripped off the furnace fuel due to the excessive furnace outlet temperature. This trip failed to function. 

The situation on a trayed tower is far more controllable. Even after the tray assembly is complete, the process engineer, using only a crescent wrench, can open a few tray deck manways and doublecheck the tower internals. But to pull 6 ft of packing out of a tower is a major undertaking. Also, trays can be stepped on without damage. Beam supports and 40-lb air guns can be dragged across a sieve tray... 

The situation on a trayed tower is far more controllable. Even after the tray assembly is complete, the process engineer, using only a crescent wrench, can open a few tray deck manways and double-check... 

Burning Pyrites. The burning of pyrite is considerably more difficult to control than the burning of sulfur, although many of the difficulties have been overcome ia mechanical pyrite burners. The pyrite is burned on multiple trays which are subject to mechanical raking. The theoretical maximum SO2 content is 16.2 wt %, and levels of 10—14 wt % are generally attained. As much as 13 wt % of the sulfur content of the pyrite can be converted to sulfur trioxide ia these burners. In most appHcations, the separation of dust is necessary when sulfur dioxide is made from pyrite. Several methods can be employed for this, but for many purposes the use of water-spray towers is the most satisfactory. The latter method also removes some of the sulfur... 

The designer usually wants to specify stream flow rates or parameters in the process, but these may not be directly accessible. For example, the desired separation may be known for a distiUation tower, but the simulation program requires the specification of the number of trays. It is left up to the designer to choose the number of trays that lead to the desired separation. In the example of the purge stream/ reactor impurity, a controller module may be used to adjust the purge rate to achieve the desired reactor impurity. This further complicates the iteration process. 

Mass-transfer theory indicates that for trays of a given design the factors most hkely to inflnence E in absorption and stripping towers are the physical properties of the flnids and the dimensionless ratio Systems in which the mass transfer is gas-film-controlled may be expected to have plate efficiencies as high as 50 to 100 percent, whereas plate efficiencies as low as 1 percent have been reported for the absorption of gases of low sohibility (large m) into solvents of relatively high viscosity. 

Solution Because vapor rate changes are reflected up and down the column much faster than liquid rate changes, the temperature difference controller w as disconnected and the tower was controlled instead by boilup. A temperature 10 trays from the bottom set reboiler heating medium and the reflux W as put on flow control. 

For most trays, liquid flows across an active area of the tray and then into a downcomer to the next tray below, etc. Inlet and/or outlet weirs control the liquid distribution across the tray. Vapor flows up the tower and passes through the tray active area, bubbling up through (and thus contacting) the liquid flowing across the tray. The vapor distribution... 

These trays are somewhat sensitive to rapid changes in tower conditions. Towers over 40 trays must be controlled within fine limits. 

There are two ways to answer this question. Let s first look at the reboiler. As the tower-top temperature shown in Fig. 4.1 goes down, more of the lighter, lower-boiling-point alcohol is refluxed down the tower. The tower-bottom temperature begins to drop, and the steam flow to the reboiler is automatically increased by the action of the temperature recorder controller (TRC). As the steam flow to the reboiler increases, so does the reboiler duty (or energy injected into the tower in the form of heat). Almost all the reboiler heat or duty is converted to vaporization. We will prove this statement mathematically later in this chapter. The increased vapor leaving the reboiler then bubbles up through the trays, and hence the flow of vapor is seen to increase, as the reflux rate is raised. 

The statement that the mass, or weight flow of vapor through the trays, increases as the refluxed rate is raised is based on the reboiler being on automatic temperature control. If the reboiler were on manual control, then the flow of steam and the reboiler heat duty would remain constant as the reflux rate was increased, and the weight flow of vapor up the tower would remain constant as the top reflux rate was increased. But the liquid level in the reflux drum would begin to drop. The reflux drum level recorder controller (LRC) would close off to catch to falling level, and the overhead product rate would drop, in proportion to the increase in reflux rate. We can now draw some conclusions from the foregoing discussion ... 

Feed enters T-2 at tray 5. There is a pump-through reboiler. Another pump withdraws material from the bottom and sends it to tower T-3. Liquid is pumped from tray 18 through a cooler and returned in part to the top tray 20 for temperature and reflux control. A portion of this pumparound is withdrawn after cooling as unsaps product. Steam leaves the top of the tower and is condensed in the barometric. 

Enter an alpha value if you have chosen F or T for the method. Enter a K value for a light key component if you chose A. Input the factor alpha or K. Alpha is defined as simply the light key K divided by the heavy key K component. The K factor is simply the particular component s vapor phase mole fraction divided by its liquid mole fraction. The alpha value is therefore a ratio of the chosen two key components. These key components should be those that readily point to how well the fractionator is doing its job of separation. For example, for a depropanizer tower, choose propane as the light key component and butane as the heavy key, since you wish to separate the propane from the butane to make a propane product specification. For a multicomponent system, you may try several components to determine a controlling alpha and/or to factor an average tray efficiency. 

Extractive Distillation Recovery of Isoprene. A typical flow-sketch and material balance of distillation and solvent recovery towers for extracting isoprene from a mixture of cracked products with aqueous acetonitrile appears in Figure 13.25. A description of the flowsheet of a complete plant is given in Example 2.9. In spite of the fact that several trays for washing by reflux are provided, some volatilization of solvent still occurs so that the complete plant also has water wash columns on both hydrocarbon product streams. A further complication is that acetonitrile and water form an azeotrope containing about 69 mol % solvent. Excess water enters the process in the form of a solution to control poly-... 

---