Transition state, microscopic reversibility

We use the constructs of transition state theory in order to define the Br0nsted-Evans-Polanyi (BEP) relationship, which relates the equilibrium thermodynamics (reaction enthalpy or free energy) with non-equilibrium thermodynamic features, namely the activation energy and activation entropy. A small value of the proportionality parameter in the BEP relationship, a, is identified with an early transition state, whereas values of a that are close to 1 relate to a late transition state. Microscopic reversibility ensures that if the forward reaction is an early transition state then the backward reaction must be a late transition state and vice versa. 

Here, Ri f and Rf i are the rates (per moleeule) of transitions for the i ==> f and f ==> i transitions respeetively. As noted above, these rates are proportional to the intensity of the light souree (i.e., the photon intensity) at the resonant frequeney and to the square of a matrix element eonneeting the respeetive states. This matrix element square is oti fp in the former ease and otf ip in the latter. Beeause the perturbation operator whose matrix elements are ai f and af i is Hermitian (this is true through all orders of perturbation theory and for all terms in the long-wavelength expansion), these two quantities are eomplex eonjugates of one another, and, henee ai fp = af ip, from whieh it follows that Ri f = Rf i. This means that the state-to-state absorption and stimulated emission rate eoeffieients (i.e., the rate per moleeule undergoing the transition) are identieal. This result is referred to as the prineiple of microscopic reversibility. 

In any equilibrium process the sequence of intermediates and transition states encountered as reactants proceed to products m one direction must also be encountered and m precisely the reverse order m the opposite direction This is called the principle of microscopic reversibility Just as the reaction... 

Microscopic reversibility (Section 6 10) The pnnciple that the intermediates and transition states in the forward and back ward stages of a reversible reaction are identical but are en countered in the reverse order... 

When the addition and elimination reactions are mechanically reversible, they proceed by identical mechanistic paths but in opposite directions. In these circumstances, mechanistic conclusions about the addition reaction are applicable to the elimination reaction and vice versa. The principle of microscopic reversibility states that the mechanism (pathway) traversed in a reversible reaction is the same in the reverse as in the forward direction. Thus, if an addition-elimination system proceeds by a reversible mechanism, the intermediates and transition states involved in the addition process are the same as... 

We now introduce the principle of microscopic reversibility. This states that the transition states for any pathway for an elementary reaction in forward and reverse directions are related as mirror images. The atoms are in the same places but the momentum vectors are, of course, reversed since in general the transition state is proceeding in one direction only. In other words, the forward and reverse mechanisms are identical, according to this principle. 

Since microscopic reversibility requires that the transition states for each direction of the ET reaction be identical,... 

Relatively few data are available (Table H) for reactions involving intramolecular general acid catalysis, but in most cases the EM s fall in the same range as those for general base catalysis (Tables E-G). This is expected if EM is a characteristic transition-state property, because a general acid catalysed reaction is always the microscopic reverse of a general base catalysed process as shown in equation (5), although in no case has the EM been measured in both directions. 

The treatment of these simple associations directly follows that of the simple fission reactions discussed previously. For example, these reactions proceed via the formation of a loose transition state and without an activation energy barrier. The rates and rate parameters of simple associations can be determined either directly, by the application of bimolecular TST, or from their reverse, simple unimolecular fission reactions, through the use of the principle of microscopic reversibility. 

Acylation and deacylation in equation (13) proceed through similar transition states. If deacylation occurs through attack of an alcohol molecule R OH rather than water on the carbonyl carbon atom, then deacylation is the microscopic reverse of acylation. Bender and coworkers (Bender and Kezdy, 1965) have demonstrated the symmetry of the reaction about the acyl enzyme in reactions in which reversibility can be observed. 

The mechanism for esterification given in Problem 16.16 is reversible, the reverse being the mechanism for acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of esters. As an example of the principle of microscopic reversibility, the forward and reverse mechanisms proceed through the same intermediates and transition states. 

It follows that the equilibrium constant K is given by kf/kr. The reverse reaction is inverse second order in iodide, and inverse first-order in H+. This means that the transition state for the reverse reaction contains the elements of arsenious acid and triiodide ion less two iodides and one hydrogen ion, namely, H2As03I. This is the same as that for the forward reaction, except for the elements of one molecule of water, the solvent, the participation of which cannot be determined experimentally. The concept of a common transition state for the forward and reverse reactions is called the principle of microscopic reversibility. 

Marcus and Rice6 made a more detailed analysis of the recombination from the point of view of the reverse reaction, the unimolecular decomposition of ethane, C2Ha - 2CH3. By the principle of microscopic reversibility the transition states must be the same for forward and reverse paths. Although they reached no definite conclusion they pointed out that a very efficient recombination of CH3 radicals would imply a very high Arrhenius A factor for the unimolecular rate constant of the C2H6 decomposition which in turn would be compatible only with a very "loose transition state. Conversely, a very low recombination efficiency would imply a very tight structure for the transition state and a low A factor for the unimolecular decomposition. 

---