Transition entropy probability

Numerical simulations of the k = oo case reveal a sharp phase transition at Ac = 0.27 [wootters]. Simulations also suggest that the spread in values of entropy decreases with increasing k, and that the width of the transition region probably goes as k f [woot90]. 

Since thermodynamic concepts are used to calculate the transition state probability, and the entropy varies along the reaction path, it is more correct to formulate Eqn. (5.26) as... 

The probability of the existence of active centers in the form of ion pairs or free ions is determined by the free energy variation due to (a) a change in the entropy and transition from Gaussian distribution to cyclic conformation and (b) a change in the energy of Coulomb interaction at this transition. This probability evidently depends on the length of the macromolecular chain. 

We might also point out that our earlier thoughts on photochemical reactivity and radiationless transitions, with the energy gap between the excited species and the corresponding ground state structure as a dominant factor, is not likely to be apphcable to predicting HT reactivity. We suspect that the latter is controlled by kinetic factors such as entropy probability during relaxation of the Franck-Condon species. The latter topic will be dealt with in detail in a separate, future publication. ... 

Dynamical Entropy In order to capture the dynamics of a CML pattern, Kaneko has constructed what amounts to it mutual information between two successive patterns at a given time interval [kaneko93]. It is defined by first obtaining an estimate, through spatio-temporal samplings, of the probability transition matrix Td,d = transition horn domain of size D to a domain of size D. The dynamical entropy, Sd, is then given by... 

Here g has been set to zero, as is justified later.) This shows that the fluctuations in the-transition probability are determined by a symmetric matrix, g, in agreement with previous analyses [35, 82]. Written in this form, the second entropy satisfies the reduction condition upon integration over x to leading order (c.f. the earlier discussion of the linear expression). One can make it satisfy the reduction condition identically by writing it in the form... 

The transition x —> x" is determined by one-half of the external change in the total first entropy. The factor of occurs for the conditional transition probability with no specific correlation between the terminal states, as this preserves the singlet probability during the reservoir induced transition [4, 8, 80]. The implicit assumption underlying this is that the conductivity of the reservoirs is much greater than that of the subsystem. The second entropy for the stochastic transition is the same as in the linear case, Eq. (71). In the expression for the second entropy... 

This confirms the earlier interpretation that the exponent reflects the entropy of the reservoirs only, and that the contribution from internal changes of the subsystem has been correctly removed. During the adiabatic transition the reservoirs do not change, and so the probability density must be constant. Obviously there is an upper limit on the time interval over which this result holds since the assumption that X Xs implies that A( (x)x -C XS. ... 

This result says in essence that the probability of a positive increase in entropy is exponentially greater than the probability of a decrease in entropy during mechanical work. This is in essence the fluctuation theorem that was first derived by Bochkov and Kuzovlev [58-60] and later by Evans et al. [56, 57]. A derivation has also been given by Crooks [61, 62], and the theorem has been verified experimentally [63]. The present derivation is based on the author s microscopic transition probability [4]. 

Hilvert s group used the same hapten [26] with a different spacer to generate an antibody catalyst which has very different thermodynamic parameters. It has a high entropy of activation but an enthalpy lower than that of the wild-type enzyme (Table 1, Antibody 1F7, Appendix entry 13.2a) (Hilvert et al., 1988 Hilvert and Nared, 1988). Wilson has determined an X-ray crystal structure for the Fab fragment of this antibody in a binary complex with its TSA (Haynes et al., 1994) which shows that amino acid residues in the active site of the antibody catalyst faithfully complement the components of the conformationally ordered transition state analogue (Fig. 11) while a trapped water molecule is probably responsible for the adverse entropy of activation. Thus it appears that antibodies have emulated enzymes in finding contrasting solutions to the same catalytic problem. 

We notice that the only difference between both dynamical entropies is the exchange of oa and oa in the transition probabilities appearing in the logarithm. According to Eq. (101), the thermodynamic entropy production of this process would be equal to... 

Figure 18. The dynamical entropies (126) and (127) as well as the entropy production (128) for the three-state Markov chain defined by the matrix (125) of transition probabilities versus the parameter a. The equilibrium corresponds to the value a — Ij i. The process is perfectly cyclic at a = 0 where the path is. .. 123123123123. .. and the Kohnogorov-Sinai entropy h vanishes as a...

I am suggesting that often the applicability of Barkley-Butler type plots, that is, the linear relationship between the entropy and enthalpy of activation in a series may come about because of there being a distribution of reaction paths. Small variations in the importance of low activation energy, low probability paths could then account for the data in Dr. Taube s table. By contrast, transition state theory in its approximate application, invariably leads to diagrams of energy vs. reaction path which, in spite of all protest, one reaction path, whatever it is, one transition state, and one energy. 

---