Transition cohesive energy

Material properties can be further classified into fundamental properties and derived properties. Fundamental properties are a direct consequence of the molecular structure, such as van der Waals volume, cohesive energy, and heat capacity. Derived properties are not readily identified with a certain aspect of molecular structure. Glass transition temperature, density, solubility, and bulk modulus would be considered derived properties. The way in which fundamental properties are obtained from a simulation is often readily apparent. The way in which derived properties are computed is often an empirically determined combination of fundamental properties. Such empirical methods can give more erratic results, reliable for one class of compounds but not for another. 

In this approach, connectivity indices were used as the principle descriptor of the topology of the repeat unit of a polymer. The connectivity indices of various polymers were first correlated directly with the experimental data for six different physical properties. The six properties were Van der Waals volume (Vw), molar volume (V), heat capacity (Cp), solubility parameter (5), glass transition temperature Tfj, and cohesive energies ( coh) for the 45 different polymers. Available data were used to establish the dependence of these properties on the topological indices. All the experimental data for these properties were trained simultaneously in the proposed neural network model in order to develop an overall cause-effect relationship for all six properties. 

We will limit ourselves here to transition metals. It is well known that in these metals, the cohesive properties are largely dominated by the valence d electrons, and consequently, sp electrons can be neglected save for the elements with an almost empty or filled d valence shelP. Since the valence d atomic orbitals are rather localized, the d electronic states in the solid are well described in the tight-binding approximation. In this approximation, the cohesive energy of a bulk crystal is usually written as ... 

The materials for solid solutions of transition elements in j3-rh boron are prepared by arc melting the component elements or by solid-state diffusion of the metal into /3-rhombohedral (/3-rh) boron. Compositions as determined by erystal structure and electron microprobe analyses together with the unit cell dimensions are given in Table 1. The volume of the unit cell (V ) increases when the solid solution is formed. As illustrated in Fig. 1, V increases nearly linearly with metal content for the solid solution of Cu in /3-rh boron. In addition to the elements listed in Table 1, the expansion of the unit cell exceeds 7.0 X 10 pm for saturated solid solutions " of Ti, V, (2o, Ni, As, Se and Hf in /3-rh boron, whereas the increase is smaller for the remaining elements. The solubility of these elements does not exceed a few tenths at %. The microhardness of the solid solution increases with V . Boron is a brittle material, indicating the accommodation of transition-element atoms in the -rh boron structure is associated with an increase in the cohesion energy of the solid. 

In the Introduction the problem of construction of a theoretical model of the metal surface was briefly discussed. If a model that would permit the theoretical description of the chemisorption complex is to be constructed, one must decide which type of the theoretical description of the metal should be used. Two basic approaches exist in the theory of transition metals (48). The first one is based on the assumption that the d-elec-trons are localized either on atoms or in bonds (which is particularly attractive for the discussion of the surface problems). The other is the itinerant approach, based on the collective model of metals (which was particularly successful in explaining the bulk properties of metals). The choice between these two is not easy. Even in contemporary solid state literature the possibility of d-electron localization is still being discussed (49-51). Examples can be found in the literature that discuss the following problems high cohesion energy of transition metals (52), their crystallographic structure (53), magnetic moments of the constituent atoms in alloys (54), optical and photoemission properties (48, 49), and plasma oscillation losses (55). 

The first part of the chapter is devoted to an analysis of these correlations, as well as to the presentation of the most important experimental results. In a second part the following stage of development is reviewed, i.e. the introduction of more quantitative theories mostly based on bond structure calculations. These theories are given a thermodynamic form (equation of states at zero temperature), and explain the typical behaviour of such ground state properties as cohesive energies, atomic volumes, and bulk moduli across the series. They employ in their simplest form the Friedel model extended from the d- to the 5f-itinerant state. The Mott transition (between plutonium and americium metals) finds a good justification within this frame. 

Nevertheless, the inspection of other transition metal series shows that, just as atomic volumes, there are regular variations of cohesive energies when the metal valence changes. Thus, a general increase of about 45 Kcal/mol is found when a metal transforms from a trivalent to a tetravalent state. 

In Fig. 7 the results of the model for the cohesive energy are given, and compared with the experimental values and with the results of band calculations. The agreement is satisfactory (at least of the same order as for similar models for d-transition metals). For americium, the simple model yields too low a value, and one needs spin-polarized full band calculations (dashed curve in Fig. 7) to have agreement with the experimental value. 

The trends in several ground state properties of transition metals have been shown in Figs. 2, 3 and 15 of Chap. A and Fig. 7 of Chap. C. The parabolic trend in the atomic volume for the 3-6 periods of the periodic table plus the actinides is shown in Fig. 3 of Chap. A. We note that the trend for the actinides is regular only as far as plutonium and that it is also broken by several 3 d metals, all of which are magnetic. Similar anomalies for the actinides would probably be found in Fig. 15 of Chap. A - the bulk modulus - and Fig. 7 of Chap. C - the cohesive energy if more measurements had been made for the heavy actinides. 

The trend in the f-pressure is almost parabolic with band filling and this is typical for a transition metal (with d replaced by f). The physical basis was given by the Friedel who assumed that a rectangular density of states was being filled monotonically and thus was able to reproduce the parabolic trend in transition metal cohesive energies analytically. Pettifor has shown that the pressure formula can similarly be integrated analytically. 

---