Tracking test parameter

At the opposite end of the spectrum, consider a computer system used to track inert material in a warehouse. Errors in the system may inconvenience the production schedule, but have little or no chance of causing real harm. Even a complete misidentification will be quickly corrected in a QA test of final product. For such a system some validation is stiU necessary, but a higher tolerance could be used (smaller samples, less frequent rechecks, and broader testing parameters). 

ISO 6601. 1987 [6] lists the test parameters involved and outlines the various geometries that are available. Some of these are shown in Fig. 3. The linear track apparatus shown at (1) is suitable for both rubbers and plastics, a typical example being the apparatus described by James and Newell [5], but perhaps the most well known apparatus of this type is that described in ISO 8295 [7], a test method for plastics film and sheeting, said to be suitable for measuring either static or dynamic friction. 

Permanent deformation behaviour of asphalts is determined by the wheel tracking test (see Sections 7.6.5 and 7.6.6). From an extensive study, it was found that the wheel tracking parameters such as rate or the wheel tracking slope and the rut depth or the proportional rut depth of the asphalt concrete mixtures (AC 20 mm) with SBS-modified bitumen were, in all cases, lower than those obtained for the AC 20 mm mixtures with 50/70 grade bitumen (Nikolaides and Manthos 2009). 

The inclined-plane test uses test parameters controlled to produce constant and uniform scintillation. Tracking and erosion are accelerated as compared to the short, widely spaced periods during which scintillation occurs in actual service. 

During the characterization process, hits are typically tested for kinetic solubility and permeability in a model of passive diffusion such as PAMPA [22]. As new compounds are synthesized, additional parameters also need to be considered, such as pZa, chemical and plasma stability, and protein binding. Calculated properties such as MW, clogP, and PSA should also be tracked. 

The IRT method was applied initially to the kinetics of isolated spurs. Such calculations were used to test the model and the validity of the independent pairs approximation upon which the technique is based. When applied to real radiation chemical systems, isolated spur calculations were found to predict physically unrealistic radii for the spurs, demonstrating that the concept of a distribution of isolated spurs is physically inappropriate [59]. Application of the IRT methodology to realistic electron radiation track structures has now been reported by several research groups [60-64], and the excellent agreement found between experimental data for scavenger and time-dependent yields and the predictions of IRT simulation shows that the important input parameter in determining the chemical kinetics is the initial configuration of the reactants, i.e., the use of a realistic radiation track structure. 

The tests were also performed on computer-generated data in which additional uniform or non-uniform motion was added, to study how far the CG algorithm could be pushed beyond its original design parameters. For uniform motion, CG tracking was as successful as in the quiescent case for small drifts but failed for drifts of the order of half the particle-particle separation. For non-uniform (linear shear) flows with small strains between frames the identification worked correctly, but large non-uniform displacements caused major tracking errors. 

A set of at least two cubes are used to achieve the full capability of the instrument. The relative locations of the radiometer cubes and the flare, as well as the orientations of the cubes are determined prior to the flare test and entered into the computer to allow real-time tracking of key flare radiation parameters. Each radiometer on the cubes is connected to a data acquisition system. The data acquisition system collects the data from each sensor and performs trigonometric calculations using a complex set of equations. The results are real-time parameters of the flare radiation total radiation levels from both cubes, incidence angles, and the flare epicenter coordinates. This instrument has three main advantages over the handheld instrument ... 

The main difficulty encountered in testing the various models of Ps formation arises due to the fact that they involve fast processes (in the range of subpicoseconds) of radiation chemistry, in a medium (the terminal track of the positron) that is clearly not in thermal equilibrium. In addition, the only parameter generated in an experiment is the o-Ps intensity, which depends in a complex way on many competing processes, which are very difficult to control. 

---