Total inhomogeneous equations

It is easy to see that Eqs (121)-(123) differ in the values of m only. Namely, if / = 1, then y/j(p) and if m = 0, then Y-p (p) = i /p (p) = constant. It means that m= I represents the total homogeneous surface and m = 0 means a total inhomogeneous surface, which appears in the fact diat the original Freundlich equation does not have a limiting value whenp tends to infinity. All values of m between zero and unity represent different heterogeneities of the adsorbent existing between the Freundlich and Langmuir theories. 

Equation (5), however, would apply only to a perfectly packed column so Van Deemter introduced a constant (2X) to account for the inhomogeneity of real packing (for ideal packing (X) would take the value of 0.5). Consequently, his expression for the multi-path contribution to the total variance per unit length for the column (Hm) is... 

These two equations represent the assoeiative analogue of Eq. (14) for the partial one-partiele eavity funetion. It is eonvenient to use equivalent equations eontaining the inhomogeneous total pair eorrelation funetions. Similarly to the theory of inhomogeneous nonassoeiating fluids, this equiva-lenee is established by using the multidensity Ornstein-Zernike equation (68). Eq. (14) then reduees to [35]... 

In accordance with Equation (2.338) the determination of the figure of fiuid equilibrium is reduced to the following problem we have to find such a surface of the fluid, S(x,y,z), that its partial derivatives should be proportional to the corresponding components of the acting force. As we pointed out, when a fluid rotates uniformly around the same axis the total force can be represented as a sum of the attraction and centrifugal forces, and the former depends on the shape of the fluid mass in a rather complicated way. Besides, in the case of an inhomogeneous fluid the potential of the attraction field depends on the distribution of a density of a fiuid and for this reason this problem becomes even more complicated. 

The sampling variance of the material determined at a certain mass and the number of repetitive analyses can be used for the calculation of a sampling constant, K, a homogeneity factor, Hg or a statistical tolerance interval (m A) which will cover at least a 95 % probability at a probability level of r - a = 0.95 to obtain the expected result in the certified range (Pauwels et al. 1994). The value of A is computed as A = k 2R-s, a multiple of Rj, where is the standard deviation of the homogeneity determination,. The value of fe 2 depends on the number of measurements, n, the proportion, P, of the total population to be covered (95 %) and the probability level i - a (0.95). These factors for two-sided tolerance limits for normal distribution fe 2 can be found in various statistical textbooks (Owen 1962). The overall standard deviation S = (s/s/n) as determined from a series of replicate samples of approximately equal masses is composed of the analytical error, R , and an error due to sample inhomogeneity, Rj. As the variances are additive, one can write (Equation 4.2) ... 

By interpreting the term in brackets as the total current density the inhomogeneous Maxwell equation (2) is also written as... 

If the total number of basis functions f l for all cells is N,p, then for each global solution index X there are 2N,p equations for the 2N,p elements of the column vectors oj1"- and Thus the variational equations derived from Ea provide exactly the number of inhomogeneous linear equations needed to determine the two coefficient matrices, oj and /I These equations have not yet been implemented, but they promise to provide an internally consistent energy-linearized full-potential MST. 

Kirkwood derived an analogous equation that also relates two- and three-particle correlation functions but an approximation is necessary to uncouple them. The superposition approximation mentioned earlier is one such approximation, but unfortunately it is not very accurate. It is equivalent to the assumption that the potential of average force of three or more particles is pairwise additive, which is not the case even if the total potential is pair decomposable. The YBG equation for = 1, however, is a convenient starting point for perturbation theories of inhomogeneous fluids in an external field. 

E r,(a) describes electric held without taking into account inhomogeneities. To solve the integral equation (16), the hrst Born approximation can be utilized. In the hrst Bom approximation, additional medium polarization Pi(r,co) depends only on the unperturbed electric held ) (r,fo), and the total electric held is... 

The physical defect of the approximation (6,47) and (6.48), apart from its neglect of the specification of the chain end(s), lies in the fact that the approximate excluded volume field is made up of a sum of contributions from only a portion of the total chain (of contour length L). This arises because the G s in (6.48), which are defined through the inhomogeneous diffusion equations, vanish when s — s" or s" — s < 0. Thus the actual limits of integration must be j > s" > s. ... 

Thus, complex chemical processes are represented as a number of simple reactions that are very inhomogeneous on a time scale. Generally, it is impossible to separate the fast processes and the slow ones from each other, so that a continuous time monitoring of the total kinetic process is needed to understand the essence of the phenomenon. Mathematical models provide an adequate tool for the scanning of the kinetic curves. Fig. 1(a) shows a typical example of curves where two time scales are present. These time scales differ up to an order of 10 from each other. If one considers the process on the logarithmic scale, then just three different time scales may be identified, see Fig. 1(b). The presence of both fast and slow variables is explained by the occurrence of either large or small factors in the dynamical equations. For example, this is the case for so-called stiff systems of differential equations. 

---