Time evolution variable estimates

Figures 6.5 and 6.6 are referred to a slow drift of the output of sensor Sj, i.e., a linearly increasing signal, with a 10-3 K s 1 rate of change, is added to the measured variable for t >t = 9000 s. It can be recognized that the fault is detected a few time instants after the occurrence, while it is isolated about 2000 s after tf. This is due to the slow time evolution of the fault it can be argued that, in the first 2000 s after the occurrence of the fault, its effect is quite negligible and/or almost totally compensated by the observers. In order to reduce the isolation time, the normalization factors could be reduced, at the expense of an increased probability of false alarms. Moreover, Fig. 6.5 shows that the voted measure is the mean value of the measured and estimated data until the isolation is performed, and then it switches to the value of the healthy sensor (5), i).

Here, the temperature, pressure, and chemical potential are estimated at ambient conditions. For an optimal control problem, one must specify (i) control variables, volume, rate, voltage, and limits on the variables, (ii) equations that show the time evolution of the system which are usually differential equations describing heat transfer and chemical reactions, (iii) constraints imposed on the system such as conservation equations, and (iv) objective function, which is usually in integral form for the required quantity to be optimized. The value of process time may be fixed or may be part of the optimization. 

The Nose equations of motion are smooth, deterministic and time-reversible. However, because the time-evolution of the variable s is described by a second-order equation (Eq. (63)), heat may flow in and out of the system in an oscillatory fashion [110], leading to nearly-periodic temperature fluctuations. However, from the discussion of Sects. 3 and 3.2, the dynamics of the temperature evolution should not be oscillatory, but rather result from a combination of stochastic fluctuations and exponential relaxation. At equilibrium, the approximate frequency of these oscillations can be estimated in the following way [61]. Consider small deviations ds of s away from the equilibrium value (S)e,r, where. . )e,r denotes ensemble averaging over the... 

To resolve this dilemma, some argue for divine creation some invoke the many n-dimensional Universes. Obviously, these latter explanations are far from scientific approaches. Another view is connected with recognition of the inherent limitations of the time estimates above, and propose that the need for an extraordinaryly long incubation period is obtained by invoking a plausibly small pool of amino acids, about 10 or so, short catalytic peptides, 10-20 residues, with some tolerance for sequence variability and non-random searches of only portions of the total sequence space due to the existence of chaotic attractors. Under these assumptions, a much slower reaction rate (for instance, lO -fold slower) in only a fraction of the ocean is more than sufficient to account for rapid, less then 1 million years evolution of complex, possibly living, organic systems. 

The major challenge in using (20.11) is that the gas- and aqueous-phase concentrations Cg(z, t) and Caq(z, t) for a horizontally uniform atmosphere are a function of time and altitude. Therefore one needs to estimate the evolution of both variables in the general case. We shall consider two cases, the simplified one of an irreversibly soluble gas and then the more general case of a reversibly soluble one. 

---