Tilmicosin analysis

In liquid chromatographic analysis of macrolides and lincosamides, most popular is the ultraviolet detector (Table 29.4). Tylosin, tilmicosin, spiramycin, sedecamycin, and josamycin exhibit relatively strong ultraviolet absorption, but erythromycin, lincomycin, pirlimycin, and oleandomycin show extremely weak absorption in the ultraviolet region. Hence, detection at 200-210 nm has been reported for the determination of lincomycin (146). However, a combination of poor sensitivity and interference from coextractives necessitated extensive cleanup and concentration of the extract. Precolumn derivatization of pirlimycin with 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate has also been described to impart a chromophore for ultraviolet detection at 264 nm (140). 

Electrochemical detection is better suited to the analysis of erythromycin and lincomycin. This method of detection has been applied for the determination of erythromycin A (139) and lincomycin (154) residues in salmon tissues. Liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry is particularly suitable for confirmatory analysis of the nonvolatile macrolides and lincosamides. Typical applications of this technique are through thermospray mass spectrometry, which has been used to monitor pirlimycin in bovine milk and liver (141,142), and chemical ionization, which has been applied for identification of tilmicosin (151) in bovine muscle, and for identification of spiramycin, tylosin, tilmicosin, erythromycin, and josamycin residues in the same tissue (150). 

Dubois et al. [59] determined the macrolides tylosin, tilmicoson, spiramycin, josamycin, and erythromycin in swine and bovine muscle, kidney and liver tissue, in bovine milk, and in hen eggs, using roxithromycin as IS. The method involves extraction in a Tris buffer, protein precipitation, SPE clean-up on a Oasis HLB cartridge, and LC-MS-MS analysis in SRM mode. All analytes were confirmed by four ions with an ion-ratio reproducibility ranging from 2.4 to 15%. The sample throughput is 50 samples per analyst per day. Draisci et al. [60] developed a confirmatory method for tylosin, tilmicosin, and erythromycin in bovine muscle, liver, and kidney. The quantification limits were 30, 20, and 50 pg/kg in mnscle, 40, 150, and 50 pg/kg in liver, and 40, 150, 80 pg/kg in kidney for tylosin, tilmicoson, and eiythromycin, respectively. Horie et al. [61] reported the multiresidne determination of erythromycin, oleandromycin, litasamycin, josamycin, mirosamycin, spiramycin, tilmicoson, and tylosin in meat and fish. The LOQ was 10 pg/kg in positive-ion LC-ESI-MS in SIM mode. 

Fractionation of RA in a kidney sample from the 3-day withdrawal animals was conducted similarly to that described for liver. The distribution was nonextractable 21%, aqueous methanol 14% and CCI4/CHCI3 fraction 65%. The radiochromatogram from HPLC analysis is shown in Figure 5. Most of this fraction was parent tilmicosin, with a small amount of T-1 and polar radioactivity. In contrast to liver, kidney had very little T-2. 

Among the multi-class methods reported in the literature, a procedure that involves sample dissolution with EDTA under mildly acidic conditions (pH 4.0) followed by SPE with Oasis HLB cartridges has been applied for the simultaneous analysis of macroiides, tetracyclines, quinolones, and sulfonamides in honey samples Separation and determination by UPLC-MS/MS enabled the analysis of 17 compounds in <5 min. Mean recoveries ranged from 70% to 120%, except for three compounds (doxycycline, erythromycin, and tilmicosin), which had recoveries of >50%. Application of the method to the analysis of honey samples obtained from different beekeepers and local supermarkets... 

Ding et al. described an automated on-line SPE-LC-MS/MS method for the determination of macrolide antibiotics, including erythromycin, roxithromycin, tylosin, and tilmicosin in environmental water samples. A Capcell Pak ME Ph-1 packed-column RAM was used as SPE column for the concentration of the analytes and clean-up of the sample. One millilitre of a water sample was injected into the conditioned SPE column, and the matrix was washed out with 3 ml high-purity water. By rotation of the switching valve (see Fig. 4.2), macrolides were eluted in the back-flush mode and transferred to the analytical column. The limits of detection and quantification obtained were 2-6 and 7-20 ng/1, respectively, which is suitable for trace analysis of macrolides. The intra- and inter-day precisions ranged within 2.9-12% and 3.3-8.9%, respectively. At the three fortification concentrations tested (20, 200, and 2000 ng/1), recoveries of macrolides ranged from 86.5% to 98.3%. 

---