Tight binding inhibition concentration

Slow, tight-binding inhibition occurs when slow-binding inhibition takes place at inhibitor concentrations comparable to that of the enzyme, in which case the previous two mechanisms can still apply. Comprehensive review articles on the subject of tight, slow, and slow, tight-binding inhibitors ate available in the literature (12,14). 

In this chapter we consider the situation where this assumption is no longer valid, because the affinity of the inhibitor for its target enzyme is so great that the value of K w approaches the total concentration of enzyme ( / T) in the assay system. This situation is referred to as tight binding inhibition, and it presents some unique challenges for quantitative assessment of inhibitor potency and for correct assessment of inhibitor SAR. 

Effects of Tight Binding Inhibition on Concentration-Response Data 179... 

EFFECTS OF TIGHT BINDING INHIBITION ON CONCENTRATION-RESPONSE DATA... 

All three assumptions can be violated in the case of CYP enzymes, depending on the design of the in vitro CYP inhibition study. The first assumption can be potentially violated if the drug being tested is a time-dependent inhibitor (e.g., one with a slow on rate see below). The potency of some inhibitors (e.g., the CYP3A inhibitors ketoconazole and clotrimazole) is such that the free concentration of the inhibitor tends to approach the concentration of the enzyme (40), a violation of the second assumption. In the case of such tight-binding inhibition, an apparent A) value (A i a ) )) can be estimated, as follows ... 

If the inhibitor potency is such that the concentration of inhibitor required to affect significant, time-dependent inhibition is similar to the concentration of enzyme, then one must account for the tight binding nature of the inhibition (discussed further in Chapter 7). In this case Equation (6.1) is modified as follows ... 

Plots devised by Dixon to determine K, for tight-binding inhibitors, (a) A primary plot of v versus total inhibitor present ([/Id yields a concave line. In this example, [S] = 3 x Km and thus v = 67% of Straight lines drawn from Vo (when [/It = 0) through points corresponding to Vq/2, Vq/3, etc. intersect with the x-axis at points separated by a distance /Cj app/ when inhibition is competitive. When inhibition is noncompetitive, intersection points are separated by a distance equivalent to K. The positions of lines for n = 1 and n = 0 can then be deduced and the total enzyme concentration, [EJt, can be determined from the distance between the origin and the intersection point of the n = 0 line on the x-axis. If inhibition is competitive, this experiment is repeated at several different substrate concentrations such that a value for K, app is obtained at each substrate concentration. (b) Values for app are replotted versus [S], and the y-intercept yields a value for /Cj. If inhibition is noncompetitive, this replot is not necessary (see text)... 

Enzyme inhibition by an extremely tight-binding inhibi-tor When the substrate(s), regardless of the detailed mode of inhibition, has (have) a negligible effect on the formation of enzyme-inhibitor (E-I) complex, the net result is depletion i.e., the removal of enzyme by the inhibitor from the reaction). The observed kinetic pattern is identical to the simple noncompetitive inhibition case the substrate and the inhibitor do not affect each other s binding, because only V sk is changed due to reduced enzyme concentration, while remains unaltered. 

This linearization of the tight-binding scheme allows the investigator the opportunity to calculate values for [Etotai] and Ki, the dissociation constant for the inhibitor. In the Henderson plot, [Itotai]/(l v/Vo) is plotted as a function of vjv where Vq is the steady-state velocity of the reaction in the absence of the inhibitor. The slope of the line is the apparent dissociation constant for the inhibitor. Secondary plots (from repeating the inhibition experiment at different substrate concentrations) will yield the Ki value. The vertical intercept is equal to [Etotai]- Hence, repeating the experiment at a different concentration of enzyme will produce a parallel line. 

Many inhibitors with very low dissociation constants appear to have a slow onset of inhibition when they are added to a reaction mixture of enzyme and substrate. This was once interpreted as the inhibitors having to induce a slow conformational change in the enzyme from a weak binding to a tight binding state. But in most cases, the slow binding is an inevitable consequence of the low concentrations of inhibitor used to determine its Ki. For example, consider the inhibition of trypsin by the basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Kx is 6 X 10-14 M and the association rate constant is 1.1 X 106 s-1 M-1 (Table 4.1). To determine the value of Ki, inhibitor concentrations should be in the range of K1, where the observed first-order rate constant for association is (6 X Q U M) X (1.1 X 106 s-1 M-1) that is, 6.6 X 10-8 s 1. The half-life is (0.6931/6.6) X 108 s, which is more than 17 weeks. 

---