Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Thermally stimulated depolarization currents techniques

The TSDC method is a dielectric method in the temperature domain, which allows for a fast characterization of the dielectric response of the material under investigation. The method consists of measuring the thermally activated release of stored dielectric polarization. It corresponds to measuring dielectric losses against temperature at constant low frequencies of Hz [25,26]. The [Pg.386]

When the emphasis is put on the bulk electrical properties of the material under investigation in comparison with the predictions of theoretical models, ac conductivity plots, i.e., plots of ac conductivity, cr, against frequency, uj, at constant temperature, are well suited for presenting and discussing the results of the ionic conductivity measurements [16,28]. The data are recorded isothermally with variation of the frequency, to, and cr c( ) is calculated from these data (in fact, the real part, of the complex conductivity), e.g., in the admittance presentation (Eq. (2)) [Pg.389]

Jonscher suggested the following power law dependence (universal dynamic or dielectric response) [23] [Pg.389]

The solid state properties of PUs are determined to a great extent by their microphase-separated structure. Much effort has been devoted and a variety of experimental techniques, including mainly small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), infra-red spectroscopy, DS, and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis, have been employed to investigate the microphase separation and morphology in PUs. [Pg.389]

The polyaddition reaction bonding HS to SS by means of chain extenders is a stochastic process. This aspect, as well as the rather wide molecular weight distributions of component segments, is the natural explanation for both a broad dispersion of the size of HS microdomains separated by a continuous SS phase, and a fairly low DMS [29,30]. Runt and coworkers pointed out that poly(urethane urea) multiblock copolymers have relatively low overall DMS (20-40%), in contrast to the common notion that these copolymers are well phase-separated materials [31]. [Pg.389]


TSDCT thermally stimulated depolarization current technique... [Pg.201]

TSC is a technique for detecting the transitions that depend on changes in the mobility of molecular scale dipolar structural units. TSC is based on the ability of polar molecules to be moved by an electrostatic field. Two types of current are generated thermally stimulated polarization current (TSPC) and thermally stimulated depolarization current (TSDC). TSPC is generated when dipolar structures orient in a static electric field with increasing in the temperature. TSDC is generated because of the relaxation of the previously polarized molecules as reported in Fig. 5. [Pg.197]

Some secondary relaxations of the components in thermoplastic AIPNs have been investigated by thermally stimulated depolarization current (TSDC) techniques and thermally stimulated conductivity (TSC) measurements [10,11]. It was found that upon addition of S-co-AA to CPU, the secondary and 3 CPU peaks (at ca. -140 °C and ca. -100 °C, respectively) shift slightly to lower temperatures, i.e., the corresponding relaxations become faster, these shifts being more pronounced at low S-co-AA contents. The shifts can be related to physical interactions between the IPN components and to their partial miscibility. Rizos et al. [15] have shown that as a result of such interactions, changes in the local free volume may occur, affecting the secondary relaxation times. The same changes in the [3 relaxation of PU have been found in polyurethane/polystyrene IPNs by Pandit and Nadkarni [16]. [Pg.332]

The organization of the present chapter is as follows. Dielectric techniques for molecular dynamics studies, in particular broadband dielectric spectroscopy (DS) and thermally stimulated depolarization currents (TSDC) techniques are shortly presented in the next section. Section 3, devoted to ionic conductivity measurements and analysis, focuses mostly on analysis, as the measuring techniques and equipment are often similar to those used for DS. The microphase separation and morphology of segmented PUs is discussed in the following Section 4, which completes the first introductory part of the chapter. Results obtained with selected PTE are presented in Section 5, followed by a larger Section 6 devoted to PU ionomers with ionic moieties in either of the HS and SS. PU ionomers of the latter type are often based on poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) as the SS component and, for this reason. Section 6 includes a discussion of telechelics based on PEO, which may serve as model systems for PU ionomers. In Section 7, we discuss recent results obtained with nanocomposites based on PTE, a topic attracting much current interest, before we conclude with Section 8. [Pg.383]

The advanced scattering methods,such as high resolution nuclear magnetic resonance techniques (HR-NMR), the NMR-spin diffusion, non-radiative energy transfer, excimer fluorescence, thermally stimulated depolarization current, small angle neutron scattering, SANS and FT-IR, are more appropriate for the task. For example, the NMR spin-lattice relaxation times, Tj, distinguishes > 2 nm and it may be used for either molten or solidified specimens " ... [Pg.28]

It is also necessary to note that the success of TSR techniques to obtain information on trapping states in the gap depends on whether or not the experiment can be performed under conditions that justify equation (1.2) to be reduced to simple expressions for the kinetic process. Usually, the kinetic theory of TSR phenomena in bulk semiconductors—such as thermoluminescence, thermally stimulated current, polarization, and depolarization— has been interpreted by simple kinetic equations that were arrived at for reasons of mathematical simplicity only and that had no justified physical basis. The hope was to determine the most important parameters of traps— namely, the activation energies, thermal release probabilities, and capture cross section— by fitting experimental cnrves to those oversimplified kinetic descriptions. The success of such an approach seems to be only marginal. This situation changed after it was reahzed that TSR experiments can indeed be performed under conditions that justify the use of simple theoretical approaches for the determination of trapping parameters ... [Pg.5]

Dielectric Depolarization Spectroscopy Thermally Stimulated Current Technique... [Pg.526]


See other pages where Thermally stimulated depolarization currents techniques is mentioned: [Pg.229]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.580]    [Pg.1030]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.850]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.832]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.8298]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.540]   


SEARCH



Current stimulators

Current thermally stimulated

Depolarization

Depolarization current

Depolarizer (

Depolarizers

Stimulation Techniques

Thermal depolarization

Thermal stimulation

Thermal techniques

Thermally stimulated depolarization

© 2024 chempedia.info