Thermal expansion coefficients microcracking

Arrhenius plots of conductivity for the four components of the elementary cell are shown in Fig. 34. They indicate that electrolyte and interconnection materials are responsible of the main part of ohmic losses. Furthermore, both must be gas tight. Therefore, it is necessary to use them as thin and dense layers with a minimum of microcracks. It has to be said that in the literature not much attention has been paid to electrode overpotentials in evaluating polarization losses. These parameters greatly depend on composition, porosity and current density. Their study must be developed in parallel with the physical properties such as electrical conductivity, thermal expansion coefficient, density, atomic diffusion, etc. 

We found the latter factor-voids to be important. Experimental results showed that when green coke was calcined under the new methods, and the derived calcined coke was observed by scanning electron microscopy (Figure 2) and its pore size distribution was measured by mercury porosimetry (Figure 3), microcracks of significant sizes (1 to 60 microns) were developed. This was an important contribution to the reduction of the thermal expansion coefficients of the calcined coke processed under the new method. 

The above discussion pertains to unidirectional composites that are initially free of matrix cracking examples would include Nicalon SiCf/CAS, Nicalon SiQ/1723 glass, Nicalon SiQ/LAS, and SCS-6 SiQ/HPSN. For composites such as Cf/borosilicate, where the thermal expansion coefficient of the matrix is substantially greater than that of the fiber, microcracks can develop in the matrix during fabrication. These composites do not exhibit a linear stress-strain response (Stage I), even for small applied loads. 

For (random) polycrystals, the thermal expansion coefficient is often estimated by averaging the single-crystal values and these values are included in Table 2.2. In some cases, microcracking caused by thermal expansion anisotropy can influence the overall expansion behavior (see Section 3.7). Although not discussed here, it is also important to note that thermal expansion coefficients often vary with temperature in many ceramic systems. 

Using the data in Table 2.2, estimate the change in the thermal expansion coefficient if microcracks form normal to the c axis in polycrystalline AljOj.TiO,. Sketch the variation in the thermal expansion coefficient with temperature for microcracked AljOj.TiO. ... 

Why can microcracking in non-cubic polycrystalline materials reduce the thermal expansion coefficient ... 

The thermal expansion coefficient and thermal conductivity of the COI 720 material are orthotropic, but with lower anisotropy than the elastic properties, as Table 7 indicates. The thermo-elastic properties are reasonably computed by micromechanical models that incorporate both porosity and microcracking in the matrix [146]. 

The increase in Kic to 6.5-7.5 is attributed to the misfit of the thermal expansion coefficients of TiC and SiC, introducing considerable radial tensile stresses at the phase boundaries and hoop compressive stresses in the matrix. These stresses enable crack deflection, crack branching, and microcracking above a critical particle size of 3 [tm. The optimum volume content of TiC ranges between 20 and 30 vol.%. 

SEM studies show (Fig. 4.5.2) a microcracked surface composed of discrete islands (a mud-cracked structure), which is, again, a function of the variables involved in the preparation of the sample. This structure is a possible consequence of the volume contraction arising from differences in thermal expansion coefficients and is probably responsible for the large surface area and the microcrystallinity of the coatings. 

Thermal Properties. Since polymers generally have a much larger thermal expansion coefficient than most rigid fillers, there is a significant mismatch in thermal expansion in a filled polymer. This mismatch could lead to generation of thermal stresses aroimd filler particles during fabrication and, most severely, induce microcracks at the filler interface that could lead to prematiu-e failure of the filled polymer. As for the thermal expansion coefficient of a filled polsrmer, it generally falls below the value calculated from the simple rule of mixtiu-es but follows the Kemer equation (40) for nearly spherical particles. 

Figure 12.1 Atomic force microscopy (AFM) amplitude image of sPP crystallized on an amorphous carbon surface at 125 °C. The inset presents the electron diffraction pattern of the single crystal, which indicates an upright chain orientation. The single layer of the crystal is about 15 nm in thickness. The observed transverse microcracks, are associated with an approximate order-of-magnitude higher thermal expansion coefficient between the (020) lattice planes than between their (200) counterparts. Reproduced with permission from [64], copyright 2011, American Chemical Society.

---