Theology metaphysical

Science and Civilization in Islam is the first one-volume work in English to deal with every branch of Islamic science and to approach it not from the Western viewpoint but as it is understood by the Muslims them selves. introduction surveys the religious, metaphysical, and philosophic conscepts of Islam. chapter cover the entire scientific spectrum from cosmography, mathematics, and medicine to alchemy and theology as well as how these fields interact with related schools of thought"... 

Comte s three-stage principle can be applied not only to the intellectual development of all mankind, but also to the individual development of a single human being. It can also be applied to the development of an individual science at first there is a dominance of theological and mythical concepts, followed by the phase of metaphysical speculation, and finally the advanced stage of positive knowledge. 

Historically, divisions of the sciences evolved with the establishment of European universities during the Late Middle Ages. The medieval perception made clear distinctions between theology and physics, and even between terrestrial and celestial physics. Furthermore, it separated the mathematical sciences from natural philosophy and metaphysics. Institutional divisions separated the elevated sciences (which were based on philosophical principles) from the intellectually inferior arts (which were based on the various domains of craftsmanship). Interestingly, mathematics was considered at that time to be a craft and therefore unfit for explaining natural phenomena. 

Theology was seen as being concerned with metaphysical and speculative questions, especially as these relate to the nature of God, His will for humanity and creation, and above all the doctrine of predestination. ... 

Yet, despite both the simultaneous chaos of philosophy and the repeated acts of aggression perpetrated on science by metaphysical theology, I shall be claiming here that metaphysical claims and implications won t go away, no matter how anxious that makes scientists feel. This uneasiness might seem to be most acute among physicists, for cosmology ineluctably raises question after question that, at... 

What is the nature of Darwin s argument for evolution by secondary causes and what is its value It does not belong to science but to natural theology, for it concerns God the creator and the laws he has implanted in matter. It should more properly be called metaphysical, for the argument turns on the distinction between primary and secondary causes, which are traditionally the concern of metaphysics. (Maurer, 2004, p. 497) ... 

Second, the notion of process dominates the work of three philosophers of the last century Henri-Louis Bergson (1859-1941), Samuel Alexander (1859-1938), and Alfred North Whitehead (1861-1947) (see Ayer, 1982, pp. 208-9). In passing, it is perhaps worth noting that process theology is based on the metaphysics of Whitehead, who rejected Divine Action in terms of causality, proposing that God acts persuasively in all events, but not necessarily in determining their character. Specifically, Whitehead pointed out the incoherence of belief in a lifeless universe. 

First, these questions have obvious entanglements with ideological and metaphysical issues. On the one hand, philosophical precommitments influence the plausibility criteria by which theories are assessed. On the other hand, scientific conclusions have implications for the justification of theological and moral belief. We will clearly see these dynamics at work in the controversies that follow. 

Besides his interest in gas experiments, Priestley, a prodigious worker and writer, produced volumes on theology, history, education, metaphysics, language, aesthetics, and politics. He wrote so voluminously about his gases, that the Royal Society suggested that he use a vehicle for publication other than the Philosophical Transactions. 

---