The Problem of Deriving Rate Constants

Using the transition state theory the rate constant is then given by 

There are various techniques for measuring rate constants experimentally. In the case of reactions in homogeneous solutions, the flux is determined by fast analytical tools whereas for electrochemical reactions interfacial currents are measured. Considering at first a simple electron transfer between a donor and an acceptor in homogeneous solutions, such as 

A similar problem arises for electrochemical reactions. Again considering here the reaction 

The problem becomes even more severe when using a semiconductor electrode. Since the electron density at the semiconductor surface is variable and small compared with that at metal electrodes, the electron flux is defined as 

Again using the unit cm for Cox and n. in the above equation. Inserting the local rate constant, we have here 

---

The kinetics of the thermal decomposition of solids are reviewed, with emphasis on topological considerations. The general model of nucleation in the bulk of the reactant is explored in detail and the kinetic equations appropriate to this model are derived. It is pointed out that a multistage nucleation process leads to a power law whenever the characteristic time for nucleus formation is long compared with the observation time, and that the assumption of equal rate constants for successive steps is unnecessarily restrictive. The problem of the induction period is examined and two possible reasons for the critical time to, namely the use of an incorrect model, and time-dependent growth rates (including, as a special case, aggregation without chemical decomposition) are advanced. Finally, the consequences of nucleation only on the surface of the reactant are mentioned briefly. 

Other systems are ambiguous and require a careful consideration of the magnitudes of the derived rate constants before a conclusion can be drawn. An extreme case can be found in the pH dependence of the solvolysis of m-[Co(en)2(H20)Cl]2+.330 The rate is independent of pH in the range 7—9, where the complex is almost entirely in the form of ris-[Co(en)2(OH)Cl]+ and it is usually, and probably correctly, assumed that the pH independent rate constant is that for the uncatalyzed aquation of this species.180 However, consideration ought to be given to the possibility that the observed process is the base catalyzed hydrolysis of the aquo complex in which a primary amine proton is removed. Problems of this sort are discussed in ref. 301, p.84. 

Marcus has recently returned to this problem [133] and, by analogy with the problem of donor-acceptor electron transfer at the interface between two immiscible liquids, has derived the following expression for ka, the heterogeneous rate constant for electron transfer from a semiconductor to a species in a contacting electrolyte ... 

The oxidative deterioration of most commercial polymers when exposed to sunlight has restricted their use in outdoor applications. A novel approach to the problem of predicting 20-year performance for such materials in solar photovoltaic devices has been developed in our laboratories. The process of photooxidation has been described by a qualitative model, in terms of elementary reactions with corresponding rates. A numerical integration procedure on the computer provides the predicted values of all species concentration terms over time, without any further assumptions. In principle, once the model has been verified with experimental data from accelerated and/or outdoor exposures of appropriate materials, we can have some confidence in the necessary numerical extrapolation of the solutions to very extended time periods. Moreover, manipulation of this computer model affords a novel and relatively simple means of testing common theories related to photooxidation and stabilization. The computations are derived from a chosen input block based on the literature where data are available and on experience gained from other studies of polymer photochemical reactions. Despite the problems associated with a somewhat arbitrary choice of rate constants for certain reactions, it is hoped that the study can unravel some of the complexity of the process, resolve some of the contentious issues and point the way for further experimentation. 

One apparent problem with this argument relating to kf and is that it is only easily derived for a single-step reaction. In practice, many reactions have complex rate expressions (determined by experiment) where reaction orders are not related to reaction stoichiometry. Mechanisms may not be known, and where they are, they are often multi-step. Nevertheless, even in these cases, when the system is at equilibrium, we have a distinctive situation in which all the individual elementary steps of a reaction mechanism must be in equilibrium too (see Chapter 16 for the use of the idea of elementary steps in the context of reaction mechanisms). As a result, each elementary step of the reaction sequence can be treated as an equilibrium in itself Equilibrium constants for each step can then be expressed in terms of the forward and reverse rate constants found for each elementary step. Using the relationship we discussed in Chapter 7 for finding the overall equilibrium constant of a sequence of connected equilibria, it can be demonstrated that it is valid to evaluate the expression for K(, directly from the overall stoichiometric equation, even though the reaction may take place in several steps. 

It is often easier to consider the problem of bimolecular reaction rate theory from the perspective of dissociation of the particles, and then to evaluate the recombination rate from the derived dissociation rate using the equilibrium constant. The principal difference between unimolecular and bimolecular reactions is in the treatment of angular momentum J. In unimolecular reactions the transition state is regarded as fixed by the internal coordinates simply because centrifugal effects are small. In bimolecular reactions this is not the case, as is demonstrated by the behaviour of the effective centrifugal potential... 

The derivations presented on p. 145 show that the interpretation of records of reactions involving more than two reversible steps requires the use of excessively cumbersome equations with three or more roots. One can often adjust the conditions of an experiment so that two of the steps of a complex reaction sequence are isolated from each other and/or the rest. Such uncoupling of part of a reaction occurs when all prior steps are much faster and the subsequent step is much slower. A numerical example can be used to demonstrate the reaction profile of different intermediates. The time course of a three state reversible reaction (see figure 4.4) is equivalent to three states of an enzyme, and this is illustrated with different effects of the two time constants on the three progress curves. The elucidation of the mechanism and evaluation of the individual rate constants depends on a number of factors. The problem of assigning the two time constants to the... 

The various differential equations of Table 6.1 are nonlinear and eoupled, and, in principle, they must be solved numerically, which takes exeessive computational time. For isothermal reactors for time-invariant rate constants, it is possible to derive a complete analytical solution, which is given in Appendix 6.1. However, actual reactor performance is always nonisothermal in addition, rate constants (particularly kp and k ) are dependent on reaction parameters in a very complex way. Tables 6.2 and 6.3 show the physical properties and rate constants for polystyrene and polymethyl methacrylate systems. Several researchers have attempted to solve for the reactor performance for these systems, and all of them have reported that the differential equations of Table 6.1 (along with the energy balance relation) take excessive computational time. The following discussion minimizes this problem by using the isothermal solution presented in Appendix 6.1. 

To exemplify both aspects of the formalism and for illustration purposes, we divide the present manuscript into two major parts. We start with calculations of trajectories using approximate solution of atomically detailed equations (approach B). We then proceed to derive the equations for the conditional probability from which a rate constant can be extracted. We end with a simple numerical example of trajectory optimization. More complex problems are (and will be) discussed elsewhere [7]. 

Rate law flooding. The second-order rate constant for the reaction between the hydrated ions of vanadium(3+) and chromium(2+) depends on [H+ ]. From the data given, which refer to T = 25.0 °C and a constant ionic strength of 0.500 M, formulate a two-parameter equation that describes the functional dependence. Evaluate the two constants. Compare your result to the one derived in to Problem 1 -2. 

One other point should be noted. The dimensions of the right-hand side of Eq. (7-57) are time-. That is, only first-order rate constants appear to be permitted, when in fact, the derivation assumed a bimolecular mechanism. The problem is entirely artificial, arising from the different ways in which concentration units are ordinarily dealt. 

---