Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

The Measurement of Chirality

For the measurement of chiral interactions, e.g. in the course of drug-protein binding studies [4] and other thermodynamic measurements [5]. [Pg.349]

Which pair of enantiomers of Figure 34 is most chiral Flow will we decide, when the relative magnitudes for the similarity/dissimilarity depend on the length of the window used for the comparison One way to obtain a single index for the measure of chirality is to add all of the entries in each row and view the total as the measure of chirality. The last column of Table 32 lists the total up to the windows of length 16. If we are to extend the table to the maximal paths of length 22, the relative values would not change since the additional values are all constant. From the last column of Table 32 we can read as the most chiral ... [Pg.226]

The measurement of chirality may be achieved in one of three ways—X-ray diffraction, NMR spectroscopy, and chiro-optical methods. [Pg.208]

Several solutions to this problem, especially to the measurement of chirality, have been offered in the literature, and a selected bibliography is collected for the interested reader in Ref. 1. Here we concentrate on two approaches which proved to be versatile and suitable for treating the types of problems sketched in this introduction. [Pg.2891]

The Cahn-Ingold-Prelog (CIP) rules stand as the official way to specify chirahty of molecular structures [35, 36] (see also Section 2.8), but can we measure the chirality of a chiral molecule. Can one say that one structure is more chiral than another. These questions are associated in a chemist s mind with some of the experimentally observed properties of chiral compounds. For example, the racemic mixture of one pail of specific enantiomers may be more clearly separated in a given chiral chromatographic system than the racemic mixture of another compound. Or, the difference in pharmacological properties for a particular pair of enantiomers may be greater than for another pair. Or, one chiral compound may rotate the plane of polarized light more than another. Several theoretical quantitative measures of chirality have been developed and have been reviewed elsewhere [37-40]. [Pg.418]

The competitive adsorption isotherms were determined experimentally for the separation of chiral epoxide enantiomers at 25 °C by the adsorption-desorption method [37]. A mass balance allows the knowledge of the concentration of each component retained in the particle, q, in equilibrium with the feed concentration, < In fact includes both the adsorbed phase concentration and the concentration in the fluid inside pores. This overall retained concentration is used to be consistent with the models presented for the SMB simulations based on homogeneous particles. The bed porosity was taken as = 0.4 since the total porosity was measured as Ej = 0.67 and the particle porosity of microcrystalline cellulose triacetate is p = 0.45 [38]. This procedure provides one point of the adsorption isotherm for each component (Cp q. The determination of the complete isotherm will require a set of experiments using different feed concentrations. To support the measured isotherms, a dynamic method of frontal chromatography is implemented based on the analysis of the response curves to a step change in feed concentration (adsorption) followed by the desorption of the column with pure eluent. It is well known that often the selectivity factor decreases with the increase of the concentration of chiral species and therefore the linear -i- Langmuir competitive isotherm was used ... [Pg.244]

An interesting phenomenon was observed when the CD of chiral molecules was measured in achiral solvents. The chiral solvent contributed as much as 10-20% to the CD intensity in some cases. Apparently, the chiral compound can induce a solvation structure that is chiral, even when the solvent molecules themselves are achiral. ... [Pg.144]

As already mentioned, chiral cations are involved in many areas of chemistry and, unfortunately, only few simple methods are available to determine their optical purity with precision. In the last decades, NMR has evolved as one of the methods of choice for the measurement of the enantiomeric purity of chiral species [ 110,111 ]. Anionic substances have an advantage over neutral reagents to behave as NMR chiral shift agents for chiral cations. They can form dia-stereomeric contact pairs directly and the short-range interactions that result can lead to clear differences in the NMR spectra of the diastereomeric salts. [Pg.34]

Chu, Y.Q., Wainer, I.W. (1988). The measurement of warfarin enantiomers in serum using coupled achiral/chiral high performance liquid chromatography. Pharm. Res. 5, 680-683. [Pg.340]

Regardless of the relative importance of polar and nonpolar interactions in stabilizing the cyclohexaamylose-DFP inclusion complex, the results derived for this system cannot, with any confidence, be extrapolated to the chiral analogs. DFP is peculiar in the sense that the dissociation constant of the cyclohexaamylose-DFP complex exceeds the dissociation constants of related cyclohexaamylose-substrate inclusion complexes by an order of magnitude. This is probably a direct result of the unfavorable entropy change associated with the formation of the DFP complex. Thus, worthwhile speculation about the attractive forces that lead to enantiomeric specificity must await the measurement of thermodynamic parameters for the chiral substrates. [Pg.239]

This chapter has reported the only extensive and coordinated investigation of the effects of chirality on the properties of monolayer films spread at the air-water interface. Twenty compounds of varied headgroup and chain length have been examined carrying one and two chiral centers. In every case, all of the optical isomers—enantiomers and diastereomers—were made and their properties measured both as pure compounds and as mixed monolayers in order to compare phase changes in the films with mixed melting points of the crystals. [Pg.133]

More recently, Smith et al. have developed another model based on spontaneous curvature.163 Their analysis is motivated by a remarkable experimental study of the elastic properties of individual helical ribbons formed in model biles. As mentioned in Section 5.2, they measure the change in pitch angle and radius for helical ribbons stretched between a rigid rod and a movable cantilever. They find that the results are inconsistent with the following set of three assumptions (a) The helix is in equilibrium, so that the number of helical turns between the contacts is free to relax, (b) The tilt direction is uniform, as will be discussed below in Section 6.3. (c) The free energy is given by the chiral model of Eq. (5). For that reason, they eliminate assumption (c) and consider an alternative model in which the curvature is favored not by a chiral asymmetry but by an asymmetry between the two sides of the bilayer membrane, that is, by a spontaneous curvature of the bilayer. With this assumption, they are able to explain the measurements of elastic properties. [Pg.347]


See other pages where The Measurement of Chirality is mentioned: [Pg.77]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.2901]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.2901]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.2963]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.816]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.544]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.121]   


SEARCH



Chirality measurement

Optical Chirality Measurement of the Interface

© 2024 chempedia.info