Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

The Interaction Function

The empirical energy functions used to compute MIFs can consist of the sum of one or more terms. In the GRID program, the energy function is given by the following terms  [Pg.29]


Fig. 8. Representation of the interaction functions O and R in terms of equivalent sphere radii and Rj respectively. Both interaction functions depend on the segment density but small solvent molecules can easier penetrate into a coil (left) than two of such coils penetrate into each other (right)... Fig. 8. Representation of the interaction functions O and R in terms of equivalent sphere radii and Rj respectively. Both interaction functions depend on the segment density but small solvent molecules can easier penetrate into a coil (left) than two of such coils penetrate into each other (right)...
Polymer systems containing copolymers call for a further extension of the thermodynamic model. The interaction function for statistical copolymers was originally derived by Simha and Branson [34], discussed by Stockmayer [35] et al., and experimentally verified by Glbckner and Lohmann [36]. [Pg.579]

The miscibility gap will be described more accurately when a meanfield lattice gas approach is choosen [30], The mathematical form of the interaction function in all the above models may bring about a negative value for the effective interaction parameter, g, while all binary interactions by themselves are positive. The complexity of copolymer phase behaviour can be attributed to this peculiarity, like the miscibility-windows in mixtures of a copolymer with another homopolymer [37], or with a second copolymer [38,39]. [Pg.579]

The various components of the nervous system can be further differentiated into three basic cellular elements (1) neurons, (2) interstitial cells, and (3) connective tissue, blood vessels, and microglia. The neuron is the only cell type in the nervous system involved in information processing. Each neuron is, in its own right, a receiver, an integrator, and a transmitter of information. Neurons are always in contact with other neurons so that they create simple or complex channels through which many different responses can be transmitted. All behavior, no matter how complex, results from the interactive function of the billions of neurons. [Pg.186]

The remarkable coincidence between the ratios of the critical temperatures, TCJTC within the homologous series and the ratios of the corresponding values of the interaction function w Jw supports the interpretation that this function is a measure of the energy density of interaction. [Pg.165]

Due to the translation and rotation of particles in the liquid state of a macroscopic system, the value of the interaction function may be assumed to be independent of the configuration of the particles within the system. Therefore, there is no need for data related to orientation. This is also valid for the i chainlike subunits of an alkane molecule. Due to the possibility of a free rotation of any of the i subunits around the bond axis with the neighboring subunits, a relative motion of segments of several subunits is also possible. [Pg.165]

Assuming that the molar volume V°L discussed in the previous section is a result of interaction between the particles in a condensed macroscopic system, a reference molar volume, V f, is defined using the reference volume VG and the limit value w of the interaction function w for a macroscopic system ( —>cx)) ... [Pg.167]

In all formulations that have appeared in the literature thus far, a generalization of the CA reference concept was performed to statistically test for deviations from CA. This means that a function describing interaction is incorporated in the CA model such that if the interaction parameter is 0, the interaction function disappears from the function. This nested structure allows testing whether its appearance in the model improves the description of the data significantly by applying the likelihood ratio test. The various nonlinear response surface approaches do differ in the way this deviation function is formulated. [Pg.140]

Stoneham and Durham s theory thus appears to be as satisfactory as its generality allows. Two recent developments promise greater specificity. The first (Iguchi and Tilley follows directly from Stoneham and Durham s work. However, the calculations in these studies were based on the real <102> shear-plane structure in VO3 x rather than the hypothetical <100> plane used in Stoneham and Durham s work. Furthermore, information from microscopy studies was used to quantify the magnitude of the defect forces F. The approach is promising it has supported Stoneham and Durham s conclusion that elastic interactions are sufficient to lead to the observed ordering. As yet, however, details of the interaction function have not been worked out. [Pg.117]

Kittel s simple theory gives rise to the prediction of purely repulsive interaction curves. This is in marked contrast to the defect force theories which predict the existence of minima in the interaction function. Kittel argues that repulsive curves are required to explain infinite adaptability. For if minima were present in the interaction function, those solutions whose compositions corresponded to interplanar spacings considerably displaced from the minimum would be unstable with respect to separation into two phases, one of whose composition gave a separation nearer to the minimum. The argument cannot be faulted granted thermodynamic control of the ordering in these structures. It is, however, far from certain that kinetic factors do not play a decisive role in the structure of these compounds. [Pg.118]

Despite their different conclusions, we believe that the approaches of Kittel and of Stoneham and Durham are not incompatible but rather they are complementary. Kittel s approach is probably more appropriate to systems such as the adaptive structures where the lattice parameters of the host and solute may differ considerably. The difference should be much smaller with the non-stoicheiometric systems containing shear planes in which the direct interaction may dominate. The interaction function may clearly differ in these two types of system. [Pg.118]

More formally, Auths g p is defined as the execution of a 2-party protocol between F and the interactive function S defined by repeated application of sign to the messages received from F. The output hist is defined as (m, s), where m is the sequence of messages that F sent to S or, if F sent more than N messages, the first N of them, and s is the sequence of signatures that 5 sent back. [Pg.174]

The emergence of new prochiral substrates and chiral modifiers and new enantioselective reactions have created a need for identifying common mechanistic features in all of these reactions the structural, reactivity- and affinity characteristics of the effective modifiers, the interactive functional groups of the prochiral substrates and the appropriate catalysts. [Pg.158]

Thus many heterocycles of various sizes can be formed and the reductive cyclization of polyfunctional nitro compounds offers a useful synthetic tool for the synthesis of complex molecules. When the interacting functions are not located at positions conducive to ring formation, bimolecular condensation or even polymerization may occur. [Pg.304]

A compendium of synthetic methods leading to fused heterocycles has appeared in which an updated knowledge of the synthesis of these systems, classified according to the interacting functional groups, has been reported <87HC(47)l, 92HC(47)l>. The attention of this chapter, however, has been focused on the synthesis of particular tricyclic systems. A similar treatment has been followed to that used in CHEC-I, and wherever it has been possible, a critical comparison of the various routes available to particular classes of compounds has also been made. [Pg.1002]

As the microstructural suction decreases to low values the stress path crosses the yield surface, SD, (Figure 7.b) and some plastic re-arrangements take place. In the model this phenomenon is described by the interaction function fp- A net volumetric compression was observed (and computed) at this stage. [Pg.346]

The molecular dynamics of metabolites is structure dependent and vitally important for the interactive functions in their potential applications as natural materials. To understand the relationship between molecular structure and dynamics, the molecular motions of four structurally related CO — amino acids (P-alanine, y-aminobutyric acid, 5-aminovaleric acid, and 6-aminocaproic acid) were investigated by measuring their proton spin-lattice relaxation times T and Tip) as a function of temperature (180-440 K). CPMAS NMR and DSC analyses were performed to obtain complementary information by Huang et All of these co - amino acids... [Pg.323]

Thermodynamic descriptions of polymer systems are usually based on a rigid lattice model. The relevant expression for the free energy change upon mixing, aG, was published in 1941 indepentently by Staverman and Van Santen, Huggins and Flory. In the usual notation (Flory [16]) the symbol x is used to express the interaction function. We prefer to use g((p) as interaction parameter, where x Ifg does... [Pg.234]

When allowing a library of stracturally diverse compounds to contact an MIP, it is often found that the MIP retains a few compounds that may appear structurally unrelated to the template. This nonobvious cross-reactivity has led to the industrial E q)lorasep concept which, in brief, comprises screening of 96-well plate MIP libraries grouped according to the interacting functional group of the polymer... [Pg.2590]

The conventional multipole description is the special case where each molecule is treated as a single region. The terms in this sum can be viewed diagrammatically as in Fig. 1 a, where each small circle represents a site and the line joining sites represents the interaction function T. [Pg.113]

Table 2. Electrostatic energy formulae. The interaction function for the electrostatic interaction between a multipole moment on site a and a moment on site b, both referred to local axes, is given in terms of the direction cosines r , rj and If e , e" and e are the unit vectors defining the local axis system for site a, and e e and e similarly for site b, and is a unit vector in the direction from a to b, then rj = ej e,j, rj = ej e. = -ej (note the minus sign) and c = c ej. The components of a dipole moment may be written as 0 and or as and... Table 2. Electrostatic energy formulae. The interaction function for the electrostatic interaction between a multipole moment on site a and a moment on site b, both referred to local axes, is given in terms of the direction cosines r , rj and If e , e" and e are the unit vectors defining the local axis system for site a, and e e and e similarly for site b, and is a unit vector in the direction from a to b, then rj = ej e,j, rj = ej e. = -ej (note the minus sign) and c = c ej. The components of a dipole moment may be written as 0 and or as and...

See other pages where The Interaction Function is mentioned: [Pg.254]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.687]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.689]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.939]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.745]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.106]   


SEARCH



Chemical Interactions to the Adhesion Between Evaporated Metals and Functional Croups of Different Types at Polymer Surfaces

Functional Interaction of the Calcium Channel Subunits

Functional interactions

Interactive function

The Role of Functional Groups in Drug-Receptor Interactions

The Strengths of Functional Group Contributions to Drug-Receptor Interactions

The scaling functions for purely electromagnetic interactions

© 2024 chempedia.info