The density functional model

At the same time, the formally independent particle nature of DFT allows the application of standard interpretative tools developed for the HF approach. This is true not only for the standard MuUiken population analysis, but also for more sophisticated schemes, like the Natural Bond Orbital (NBO) analysis [9], the Atomic Polarizable Tensor population [10], or the Atom in Molecule (AIM) approach [11]. These tools allow the use of familiar and well known models to analyze the molecular wave function and to rationalize it in terms of classical chemical concepts. In short, DFT is providing very effective quantum 

---

The Gordon-Kim interaction functions may be compared with empirical potential functions derived by energy- or net-force minimization methods using known crystal structures. The O—O Gordon-Kim potentials are more repulsive, as illustrated in Fig. 9.2. Spackman points out that the empirical potentials likely contain a significant attractive component because of the inadequate allowance for electrostatic interactions in their derivation. This attractive component is included in the electrostatic interaction in the density functional model. 

The MP2/6-31G model does not perform as well as any of the density functional models. As for Hartree-Fock models, most individual systems are well described but some are very poorly described. This behavior is perhaps not unexpected, as MP2 models are based on the use of Hartree-Fock wavefimctions. This means that a single electronic configuration is assumed to be better than all other configurations, a situation that is probably umeasonable for this class of compounds. 

The PM3 semi-empirical model turns in a surprisingly good account of metal-carbon (carbon monoxide) bond distances in these compounds. While PM3 is not as good as the best of the (density functional) models, individual bond lengths are typically within a few hundredths of an A from their respective experimental values, and larger deviations are uncommon. In view of cost considerations, PM3 certainly has a role in transition-metal structural chemistry. 

With the exception of semi-empirical models, all models provide very good descriptions of relative nitrogen basicities. Even STO-3G performs acceptably compounds are properly ordered and individual errors rarely exceed 1 -2 kcal/mol. One unexpected result is that neither Hartree-Fock nor any of the density functional models improve on moving from the 6-3IG to the 6-311+G basis set (local density models are an exception). Some individual comparisons improve, but mean absolute errors increase significantly. The reason is unclear. The best overall description is provided by MP2 models. Unlike bond separation energy comparisons (see Table 6-11), these show little sensitivity to underlying basis set and results from the MP2/6-3IG model are as good as those from the MP2/6-311+G model. 

Surprisingly, the MP2/6-31G model is not as satisfactory as any of the density functional models, both insofar as mean absolute error and in terms of individual errors. Use of the 6-311+G basis set in place of 6-3IG leads to marked improvement, and the results are now of comparable quality to those of the best density functional models. Given the large difference in cost between density functional and MP2 models, and given the apparent need for basis sets larger than 6-3IG for the latter, it seems difficult to recommend use of MP2 models for the purpose of conformational analysis involving acyclic systems. 

The MP2/6-31G model performs better than any of the density functional models with the same basis set. This is due primarily to an improved result for 2-chlorotetrahydropyran. MP2/6-31G and MP2/ 6-311+G models give rise to nearly identical results. 

MP2 models provide broadly similar results to the best of the density functional models for both rotation and inversion barriers. For rotation barriers, the MP2/6-311+G model provides improvement over MP2/ 6-31G. On the other hand, the two models yield very similar inversion barriers, perhaps reflecting the fact that bond angles involving nitrogen and phosphorous change only slightly between the two. 

In terms of mean absolute errors, local density models with the 6-3IG basis set perform better than the corresponding Hartree-Fock model, as well as (and generally better than) any of the density functional models, and better than MP2 models. This parallels previously noted behavior for equilibrium geometries of hypervalent compounds (see Table 5-8). 

Next, the density function model by Okabe and Suzuki will be used in order to search the optimal location for the collecting center of waste treatment facilities in Chiba. Moreover, the collecting routes from intermediate treatment facilities to the collecting center will be found by using a development programming, and a result of routes will be shown by computer simulation. Increasingly, collecting distances, units of transportation (quantity and traffic of transportation), will be calculated. 

The density function model by Okabe and Suzuki (Okabe and Suzuki 2008) is consulted to search the optimal location for the collecting center of treatment facilities. The density function model by Okabe and Suzuki showed that the location center (hub) can be found simply by calculating average value of position coordinates of its surrounding spokes using the density function. 

In order to search the optimal location of the collecting center for the intermediate treatment facilities in Chiba, the density function researched by Okabe and Suzuki is consulted. From the density function model, formulas 14 and 15 are used to find the position of the collecting center by calculating the average value of position coordinates of treatment facilities (which is shown in Table 2) which is given as follows ... 

The form of the function efr ( ) is different in different versions of the smoothed-density approximation proposed by Somo-za and Tarazona [71, 72] and by Poniwier-ski and Sluckin [69, 73]. The density functional model of Somoza and Tarazona is based on the reference system of parallel hard ellipsoids that can be mapped into hard spheres. In the Poniwierski and Sluckin theory the effective weight function is determined by the Maier function for hard sphe-rocylinders and the expression for Ayr (p) is obtained from the Carnahan-Starling ex-... 

---