Terpenoids molecular targets

In relation with resistance of weeds to herbicides, Duke et al. (2000) mentioned that new mechanisms of action for herbicides are highly desirable to fight evolution of resistance in weeds, to create or exploit unique market niches, and to cope with new regulatory legislation. Comparison of the known molecular target sites of synthetic herbicides and natural phytotoxins reveals that there is little redundancy. Comparatively little effort has been expended on determination of the sites of action of phytotoxins from natural sources, suggesting that intensive study of these molecules will reveal many more novel mechanisms of action. These authors gave some examples of natural products that inhibit unexploited steps in the amino acid, nucleic acid, and other biosynthetic pathways AAL-toxin, hydantocidin, and various plant-derived terpenoids. 

More specifically, compounds like podolactone A (Fig. 10.1) inhibit proton efflux from plant cells induced by fusicoccin, without affecting ATP levels.42 The related compound, podolactone E is a strong inhibitor of 6-aminolevulinic acid and chlorophyll synthesis.34 The authors concluded that this was caused by suppression of synthesis of proteins needed in the porphyrin pathway because podolactones also inhibited gibberellic acid-induced a-amylase synthesis in barley embryos. The molecular target site(s) of this class of terpenoid phytotoxins remains to be determined. 

The above description clearly demonstrates that phenolics and terpenoids modulate multiple signal transduction pathways and interact with multifactorial molecular targets, including inflammatory molecules, growth factors, enzymes, and genes regulating cell proliferation and apoptosis. This collection of information verifies the efficacy of phenolic and terpeniod use in the prevention and curing of various conditions. In vitro, in vivo, and animal studies have all confirmed the efficacy of plant-isolated compounds, such as phenolics and terpenoids, in... 

Easily available advanced synthons, such as the carbohydrates, amino acids, hydroxyacids, and terpenoids, make the synthetic task easier than the complexity metrics of the target suggests this is especially true for the glycosides, if the carbohydrate portion can be introduced intactly. It must also be borne in mind that the S metric is counted in a linearly additive hion, neglecting interactions between the functional groups (Whitlock 1998) such interactions are not treated adequately by any method so far proposed to calculate the molecular complexity. Moreover, no attention was paid here to the graphic analysis of the synthesis plan based on the molecular complexity of the intermediates these aspects have recently been reviewed (Bertz 1993 Whitlock 1998 Chanon 1998). 

---