Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Tensile strength typical values

Poly(vinylidene fluoride) has good tensile and impact strengths. Typical values for some properties are given in Table 7.1. [Pg.144]

Poly(vinylidene fluoride) has good tensile and impact strengths. Typical values for some properties are given in Table 7.1. The polymer has unusual piezoelectric and pyroelectric properties which have resulted in its use in solid state switching devices. [Pg.156]

Modified ETEE is less dense, tougher, and stiffer and exhibits a higher tensile strength and creep resistance than PTEE, PEA, or EEP resins. It is ductile, and displays in various compositions the characteristic of a nonlinear stress—strain relationship. Typical physical properties of Tef2el products are shown in Table 1 (24,25). Properties such as elongation and flex life depend on crystallinity, which is affected by the rate of crysta11i2ation values depend on fabrication conditions and melt cooling rates. [Pg.366]

Eor reinforcement, room temperature tensile strength and Young s modulus (stress—strain ratio) are both important. Typical values for refractory fibers are shown in Table 2. [Pg.54]

Assume that the table represents typical production-hne performance. The numbers themselves have been generated on a computer and represent random obseiwations from a population with I = 3.5 and a population standard deviation <7 = 2.45. The sample values reflect the way in which tensile strength can vary by chance alone. In practice, a production supervisor unschooled in statistics but interested in high tensile performance would be despondent on the eighth day and exuberant on the twentieth day. If the supeiwisor were more concerned with uniformity, the lowest and highest points would have been on the eleventh and seventeenth days. [Pg.490]

That is, if the local tensile, compressive or shear stresses exceed the materials tensile, compressive or shear strength then failure will occur. Some typical values for the strengths of uni-directional composites are given in Table 3.5. [Pg.233]

De Sarkar et al. [52] have reported a series of new TPEs from the blends of hydrogenated SBR and PE. These binary blends are prepared by melt mixing of the components in an internal mixer, such as Brabender Plasticorder. The tensile strength, elongation at break, modulus, set, and hysteresis loss of such TPEs are comparable to conventional rubbers and are excellent. At intermediate blend ratio, the set values show similarity to those typical of TPEs (Table 5.5). [Pg.111]

Several additional, non-microstructural, inputs are required for the fracture model (i) Particle critical stress intensity factor, KIc. Here, the value determined in a previous study (Klc = 0.285 MPa in )[3] was adopted for all four graphites studied. This value is significantly less than the bulk Klc of graphites (typically -0.8-1.2 MPa rn). However, as discussed in the previous section, when considering fracture occurring in volumes commensurate in size with the process zone a reduced value of Klc is appropriate (ii) the specimen volume, taken to be the stressed volume of the ASTM tensile test specimens specimen used to determine the tensile strength distributions and (iii) the specimen breadth, b, of a square section specimen. For cylindrical specimens, such as those used here, an equivalent breadth is calculated such that the specimen cross sectional area is identical, i.e.,... [Pg.545]

Fig. I.IB illustrates fibers typical of commercial asbestos, while Fig. l.ll shows Fiberglas and Fig. I.IJ silicon carbide whiskers. Some of the fibers in these examples are bent, occasionally through 180°, indicating considerable flexibility. Whiskers of other compounds can also bend but the tensile strength of these materials is their most remarkable feature. The measured values (Table 1.2) are at least ten times higher than those observed for the same compounds in bulk or in another morphology (Walker and Zoltai, 1979). The numerous investigations into the causes of this unique response have produced several hypotheses. Fig. I.IB illustrates fibers typical of commercial asbestos, while Fig. l.ll shows Fiberglas and Fig. I.IJ silicon carbide whiskers. Some of the fibers in these examples are bent, occasionally through 180°, indicating considerable flexibility. Whiskers of other compounds can also bend but the tensile strength of these materials is their most remarkable feature. The measured values (Table 1.2) are at least ten times higher than those observed for the same compounds in bulk or in another morphology (Walker and Zoltai, 1979). The numerous investigations into the causes of this unique response have produced several hypotheses.
Cyclic fatigue measurements require the specimen to be subjected to cyclic stress or strain of a higher amplitude than that employed for the simple dynamic test just described. The deformation must be of sufficient intensity to bring about specimen failure after a certain number of cycles, N. The value of stress leading to failure for a given N is typically 20% to 40% of the static tensile strength. [Pg.43]

Irradiation of carbon-black-reinforced polychloroprene compounds produced a maximum tensile strength of 20 MPa (2,900 psi) at a dose of 20 Mrad (200 kGy), which is a value obtained typically from chemically cured compounds. The addition of 20 phr of N,N -hexamethylene-bis methacrylamide as a prorad in the above compound produced a tensile strength of 18 MPa (2,610 psi) at a dose of 7 Mrad (70 kGy). Further addition of 6 phr of hexachlo-roethane caused the deterioration of the tensile strength by 50% at the 7 Mrad (70 kGy) dose. ... [Pg.113]

The increment in mechanical properties (tensile strength, 300% modulus, and Young s modulus) as a function of SAF is plotted in Fig. 39. In general, the higher level of SAF, which in turn indicates better exfoliation, results in high level of property enhancement. However, the level of increment with the increase in SAF is different in all three cases and follows a typical exponential growth pattern. The apparent nonlinear curve fitting of the experimental values presented in Fig. 39 is a measure of the dependence of mechanical properties on the proposed SAF function. [Pg.63]


See other pages where Tensile strength typical values is mentioned: [Pg.95]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.555]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.80]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.286 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.982 ]




SEARCH



Tensil strength

Typical values

© 2024 chempedia.info