Temperature-independent correction

It may happen that AH is not available for the buffer substance used in the kinetic studies moreover the thermodynamic quantity A//° is not precisely the correct quantity to use in Eq. (6-37) because it does not apply to the experimental solvent composition. Then the experimentalist can determine AH. The most direct method is to measure AH calorimetrically however, few laboratories Eire equipped for this measurement. An alternative approach is to measure K, under the kinetic conditions of temperature and solvent this can be done potentiometrically or by potentiometry combined with spectrophotometry. Then, from the slope of the plot of log K a against l/T, AH is calculated. Although this value is not thermodynamically defined (since it is based on the assumption that AH is temperature independent), it will be valid for the present purpose over the temperature range studied. 

Our new measurements within the temperature range 4.2 to 300 K shows that Pu(C0T)2 is temperature independent paramagnetic, Fig. 5. A small paramagnetic impurity was found which corresponded to Vgff = 0.01 y. Extrapolation for l/T- 0 yielded Xjip = (191 10) x 10-6 emu. The diamagnetic correction used, =... 

Experimental values of AG and the pre-exponential factor were obtained from a plot of In k,. vs 1/T under the assumption that the slope is — AG /R, and the hidden assumption that AG is temperature independent (AS is zero). Comparison between the calculated and observed pre-exponential factor was used to infer significant non-adiabaticity, but one may wonder whether inclusion of a nonzero AS would alter this conclusion. From an alternative perspective, reasonable agreement was noted for the values of ke and the homogeneous self-exchange rate constant after a standard Marcus-type correction was made for the differing reaction types. 

We said may be required because the most correct use of equation 2.10 is not always necessary. In our example involving formation of acetic acid, the temperature range is very narrow. Hence, it is fair to assume that ArC° is temperature independent and make Ar//j10 — A,-// ArC° (310 — 298.15). 

The temperature-independent paramagnetic term is omitted hereafter (this can be included in the empirical correction of the experimental data, together with the diamagnetic term) so that we arrive at the ZFS Hamiltonian ... 

In order to estimate the kinetic parameters for the addition and condensation reactions, the procedure proposed in [11, 14] has been used, where the rate constant kc of each reaction at a fixed temperature of 80°C is computed by referring it to the rate constant k° at 80°C of a reference reaction, experimentally obtained. The ratio kc/k°, assumed to be temperature independent, can be computed by applying suitable correction coefficients, which take into account the different reactivity of the -ortho and -para positions of the phenol ring, the different reactivity due to the presence or absence of methylol groups and a frequency factor. In detail, the values in [11] for the resin RT84, obtained in the presence of an alkaline catalyst and with an initial molar ratio phenol/formaldehyde of 1 1.8, have been adopted. Once the rate constants at 80°C and the activation energies are known, it is possible to compute the preexponential factors ko of each reaction using the Arrhenius law (2.2). 

Temperature corrections are usually not too large, due to partial cancellation of the heat capacities of the reactants and products. If the temperature of interest is not too different from 298.15 K, it is usually sufficient to use temperature-independent heat capacities, such as those obtained from Appendix B, and remove Ann C" from under the integral sign. 

We have found that in a temperature interval above Tc and below some T 300 K the nuclear spin relaxation for a broad class of cuprates comes from two independent mechanisms relaxation on the stripe -like excitations that leads to a temperature independent contribution to 1 /63i and an universal temperature dependent term. For Lai.seSro.nCuC we obtained a correct quantitative estimate for the value of the first term. We concluded from eq.(l) and Fig.3 that "stripes always come about with external doping and may be pinned by structural defects. We argue that the whole pattern fits well the notion of the dynamical PS into coexisting metallic and IC magnetic phases. Experimentally, it seems that with the temperature decrease dynamical PS acquires the static character with the IC symmetry breaking for AF phase dictated by the competition between the lattice and the Coulomb forces. The form of coexistence of the IC magnetism with SC below Tc remains not understood as well as behaviour of stoichiometric cuprates. 

It is common not to use mole fraction as the measure of concentration in solutions, but rather to express the concentration of species in terms of molalities or molarities. The former is defined as the number of moles in a kg of solvent and the latter is defined as the number of moles per liter of solution (- concentration). Since the molality is obviously temperature independent, it is the normal concentration measure used, and our convention for activity coefficient is now ps = p + F / ln ysxs for the solvent where the subscript s signifies solvent and ys - 1 when xs - 1, and for the solute p, = pf + RTlnyimi where y, - 1 as m, - 0. If there is more than one component, then the concentrations of all solutes must fall to zero simultaneously if the formula is to have any meaning, and it would be more correct to write y -> 1 as xs - 1. (Different symbols were recommended by the IUPAC for the activity coefficients, i.e., fi, yi and y, or yx, ym>, and yc>, when the concentration is expressed by mole fraction, molality and amount concentration (molarity), respectively, however, mostly y is used.)... 

In the context of the present discussion, it is worth noting that virtually all the experimental systems that exhibit such "anomalous temperature-dependent transfer coefficients are multistep inner-sphere processes, such as proton and oxygen reduction in aqueous media [84]. It is therefore extremely difficult to extract the theoretically relevant "true transfer coefficient for the electron-transfer step, ocet [eqn. (6)], from the observed value [eqn. (2)] besides a knowledge of the reaction mechanism, this requires information on the potential-dependent work terms for the precursor and successor state [eqn. (7b)]. Therefore the observed behavior may be accountable partly in terms of work terms that have large potential-dependent entropic components. Examinations of temperature-dependent transfer coefficients for one-electron outer-sphere reactions are unfortunately quite limited. However, most systems examined (transition-metal redox couples [2c], some post-transition metal reductions [85], and nitrobenzene reduction in non-aqueous media [86]) yield essentially temperature-independent transfer coefficients, and hence potential-independent AS orr values, within the uncertainty of the double-layer corrections. 

---