Temperature at the phase interface

The saturation temperature at the phase interface can, depending on the gas content, lie considerably below the saturation temperature t s(p) associated with the pressure p, which would occur if no inert gas was present. The temperature difference between the phase interface and the wall is lowered because of the inert gas and with that the heat transfer is also reduced. In order to avoid or prevent this, it should be possible to remove the inert gas through valves. Large condensers are fitted with steam-jet apparatus which suck the inert gas away. In other cases, for example the condensation of water out of a mixture of steam and air or in the condensation of ammonia from a mixture with air, it is inevitable that inert gases are always present. Therefore their influence on heat transfer has to be taken into account. 

We will presume a sufficiently large temperature difference dd — dd0, such that the vapour in its initial state A condenses, and a condensate accumulates. This is indicated by point B in Fig. 4.21b. The temperature at the phase interface is then equal to the boiling point of the liquid mixture and the composition of the accumulated condensate is identical to that of the vapour. This is known as local total condensation. The wall temperature, which is assumed to be constant, is characterised by point C. The line BC corresponds to the temperature difference —dd0 that is decisive for the heat flux q. If Nusselt s film condensation theory was also valid for vapour mixtures, then q — dd0)3/4. If dd — dd0 is kept constant... 

The temperature at the phase interface lies, as can be seen in Fig. 4.22, between the temperature on the dew point line (case b) and the temperature on the boiling line (case a). The associated vapour and liquid compositions can be read off the abcissa, points A and B in Fig. 4.22. 

In addition to this the heat transfer coefficient aL is dependent on the temperature i9j. As free convection frequently occurs in the vapour, the term aG (i9G — i9j) can often not be neglected, but can be of the same magnitude as the other expressions in (4.67), in particular when the temperature at the phase interface i91 is close to the wall temperature. This means that the driving temperature drop d — d(l will be small in the condensate, whilst in contrast, that in the vapour t G — dj will be large. The practical calculation of the temperature at the condensate surface is time consuming and, even in the case discussed here for a binary mixture, cannot be easily carried out without a computer. 

Reactive compatibilization can also be accomplished by co-vulcanization at the interface of the component particles resulting in obliteration of phase boundary. For example, when cA-polybutadiene is blended with SBR (23.5% styrene), the two glass transition temperatures merge into one after vulcanization. Co-vulcanization may take place in two steps, namely generation of a block or graft copolymer during vulcanization at the phase interface and compatibilization of the components by thickening of the interface. However, this can only happen if the temperature of co-vulcanization is above the order-disorder transition and is between the upper and lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of the blend [20]. 

A further, and likewise small, deviation from Nusselt s film condensation theory is found for superheated vapour. In addition to the enthalpy of vaporization, the superheat enthalpy CpQ ( g — < s) has to be removed in order to cool the superheated vapour from a temperature da to the saturation temperature t9s at the phase interface. Instead of the enthalpy difference Ahv according to (4.28), the enthalpy difference... 

If a vapour condenses in the presence of a non-condensable gas it has to diffuse through this gas to the phase interface. This means that a drop in the partial pressure to the phase interface is required. As can be seen in Fig. 4.8, the partial pressure pl of the vapour drops from a constant value p1G away from the phase interface to a lower value pu at the phase interface. Correspondingly, the associated saturation temperature ds(p ) also falls to the value dj at the phase interface. The pressure p0 of the inert gas rises towards the phase interface, so the sum px + p0 always yields a constant total pressure p. 

The idea that agrees best with experiments is that initially tiny drops form at nuclei sites, at depressions in the condensation surface or on the remnants of liquids. Their growth rate is determined by the resistance to thermal conduction in the drops and also partly by the thermal conduction resistances at the phase interface with the vapour. The growth rate is therefore only dependent on the specific drop radius and the driving temperature difference. This has also been confirmed by experiment [4.24], The main reasons behind the lack of success in developing an explicit theory are that the nucleation site density is unknown, and it is difficult to predict the radius of the rolling drops, as this depends on the purity and smoothness of the condensation surface as well as the interfacial tension. 

When a binary mixture, whose boiling and dew point lines are shown in Fig. 4.19, condenses on a cooled wall of temperature -j90, a condensate forms, Fig. 4.19b, which is bounded by the vapour. At the phase interface, a temperature i>i develops, which lies between the temperature dc of the vapour far away from the wall and the wall temperature d0. If the vapour is saturated, its temperature is i9a = 0S corresponding to Fig. 4.19a. The temperature profile in the vapour and condensate are illustrated in Fig. 4.19c. 

For the calculation of the temperature i9j at the phase interface, the energy equation at the condensate surface is required as a further balance equation... 

It contains the fraction for the heat transfer at the phase interface due to the temperature drop i9a — and the fraction for the energy transported through the vapour to the condensate surface. 

In the calculation of the temperature i)t at the phase interface, the area A of the condenser is subdivided into sections A A. Each section is assigned unified (mean) values for the temperatures i), i)G and the composition yG. With help from (4.67) the temperature i)t can be obtained for given values of dG, yG. In order to calculate the values 1 G, yG of any section from the values for the previous section, the material and energy balances have to be solved. 

Once the temperature i9j at the phase interface has been found using (4.67), the molar condensate flow according to (4.61) is also known. Then, from (4.69), the mole fraction yG2 of the vapour in the next section A A can be calculated. 

Modelling the three-phase distillation based on nonequilibrium contains some specific features compared to the normal two-phase distillation or the equilibrium model. In the equilibrium model of three-phase distillation only two of the three equilibrium equations are independent. In the nonequilibrium model every phase is balanced separately. Therefore all three equilibrium equations are used in the model for the interfaces. A further characteristic is, although a three-phase problem is existing, that only the mass transfer between two phases has to be calculated at every interfacial area. Additionally, the convective and conductive part of the heat transfer have to be taken into consideration, as the own investigations presented. Often the conductive part is neglected due to the small difference of the temperatures of the phase interface and the bulk phase. For the modelling of the three-phase distillation this simplification is inadmissible. 

Use diluted S03 in the gas phase to temper the rate of reaction and therefore the reaction temperature at the gas-liquid interface and in the organic phase itself. 

The heat-transfer coefficient for the liquid is often large compared with that for the gas phase. As a first approximation, therefore, it can be assumed that the whole of the resistance to heat transfer lies within the gas phase and that the temperature at the water-air interface is equal to the temperature of the bulk of the liquid. Thus, everywhere in the tower, 0/ = [.. This simplifies the calculations, since the lines AC, HJ, and so on, have a slope of -co, that is, they become parallel to the enthalpy axis. 

The conversion rates of n-hexane are shown as a function of the crystallinity parameter Qai for different temperatures. We found that the catalytical activity increases simultaneously with the increased crystallinity of the composites, the crystallization products. According this linear correlation it can be concluded that the catalytical active sites, the acidic centers in the zeolitic framework, are always, independent of the crystal content of the composite material, accessible for educt of the test reaction, the n-hexane molecules. This leads to the assumption that the crystallization must start on the interface (at the phase border) between the solution (contains the alkalinity and the template) and the solid (porous glass) surface and has to carry on to the volume phase of the glass resulting finally in complete transformed granules. 

---