Teaching, suggestion, motivation

The TSM test is a very useful construct because it asks that the examiner provide objective evidence to support his rejection. This requirement is especially important in many chemical cases where the obviousness of a chemical structure is being asserted. In order for a claim to a chemical structure or composition to be obvious, the examiner must be able to allege not only structural similarity of the chemical structure or composition but also where the prior art provides the teaching, suggestion, or motivation to make the suggested change or combination or, if not in the prior art, why one of ordinary skill would have been motivated to combine or modify the prior art in the absence of a specific teaching in the prior art itself. 

Throughout Section 3, suggestions for monitoring achievements are offered as I explain particular intervention strategies for teaching and motivating safe behavior. It is also possible to use surveys periodically and estimate successes from employee reactions to certain questions. A distress survey was presented in Chapter 6, for example, and a lower score on this survey would suggest improvement. In Section 4,1 show you how to measure an individual s propensity to "actively care" or go beyond the call of duty for another person s safety. Increases in these measures indicate safety success. 

The teachers reflective diaries were confidential to themselves. However, they were all requested to report about their experiences in outline from the reflective diaries, as follows (1) detailed description of each lesson, (2) differences in classroom practice for each of the conducted lessons with regard to previous year(s), (3) their estimation of the results of each of the lessons in the sense of students motivation and knowledge, (4) suggestions for changes/improvements for each of the conducted lessons and (5) their general ideas for the improvement of the teaching unit and the LON approach. 

II) Invention reflection phase. Teachers had to use the materials in their schools. We expected them to acquire experience while teaching their own redesigned module, and on the basis of their experiences reflect in their peer group on the usefulness of their own designs. As a consequence, we expected that they would be able and motivated to formulate suggestions for improving the module. 

As mentioned in the brief biographical section above, my main motivation that led me to the philosophy of chemistry was the practice of chemical education. I have repeatedly suggested that modern chemical education lacks philosophical depth. I have also urged that a more philosophical examination of the subject matter in general chemistry courses is the single most important step that can invigorate the teaching of chemistry. 

The Model of Motivational Design. In 1983, Keller outlined four components of motivation with respect to learning environments interest, relevance, expectancy and satisfaction. Upon these four components Keller and Kopp (1987) build a model of motivational design. Based on their model it is suggested that attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction (ARCS) should be promoted in the learners in order to enhance their motivation. The ARCS-model sums up potential instructional techniques in the four domains that can be used and combined for promoting and sustaining motivation in teaching. The domains in the ARCS-model are ... 

Hofstein, A., Kempa, R. F. (1985). Motivating strategies in seience education Attempt of an analysis. European Journal of Science Education, 3, 221-229. The paper diseusses a very early approach to different students motivational patterns and defines four types students preferred modes of learning. It suggests that different students need different teaching methods and thus calls the teaehers to vary the teaehing methods. 

---