Surface sessile drop

Very small sessile drops have a shape that depends on the line tension along the circular contact line if large enough it induces a dewetting transition detaching the drop from the surface [84]. 

The following values for the surface tension of a 10 Af solution of sodium oleate at 25°C are reported by various authors (a) by the capillary rise method, y - 43 mN/m (b) by the drop weight method, 7 = 50 mN/m and (c) by the sessile drop method, 7 = 40 mN/m. Explain how these discrepancies might arise. Which value should be the most reliable and why ... 

Figure C2.11.8. An illustration of the equilibrium contact (i.e. wetting) angle, ( ), fonned by the balance of interfacial energies for or a liquid (sessile) drop on a flat solid surface.

This equation may be derived by eonsidering the small displaeement from equilibrium of a sessile drop on a plane surface. Fig. 3. If a small length, w, of the edge of the drop (assumed straight) advanees by a distance cLv, such that the drop takes up a new eontaet angle 6 — df ), the energy change will be ... 

As was shown above (Section 2.2, Eq. 5), Young s equation (Eq. 4) may be derived by considering the small displacement from equilibrium of a sessile drop on a plane surface. If the same derivation is applied to the situation where the solid surface has a roughness factor (Eq. 19) of r, it is readily seen that Eq. 5 becomes [28]... 

Fig. 5. Sessile drop on a rough surface true contact angle BTA and apparent contact angle BTH. Thick curve = surface of solid (s) thin curve = surface of liquid (1) v = vapour. T is the triple point HTR a horizontal AT a tangent to the solid surface BT a tangent to the liquid surface.

To investigate the influence of swelhng of the substrate by the contacting liquid, the contact angle 6 of sessile drops of tricresylphosphate, TCP (drop volume 2 p,L, viscosity t = 70 cP, surface tension = 40.9 mN m ), has been measured as a function of time after deposition, t, on flat, smooth, horizontal surfaces of soft and rigid solids at 20°C. The method of measurement of contact angle is the same as in Section Ill.A. 

The sessile drop method has several drawbacks. Several days elapse between each displacement, and total test times exceeding one month are not uncommon. It can be difficult to determine that the interface has actually advanced across the face of the crystal. Displacement frequency and distance are variable and dependent upon the operator. Tests are conducted on pure mineral surfaces, usually quartz, which does not adequately model the heterogeneous rock surfaces in reservoirs. There is a need for a simple technique that gives reproducible data and can be used to characterize various mineral surfaces. The dynamic Wilhelmy plate technique has such a potential. This paper discusses the dynamic Wilhelmy plate apparatus used to study wetting properties of liquid/liquid/solid systems important to the oil industry. 

The measurement of contact angles for a sessile drop or bubble resting on or against a plane solid surface can be measured by direct microscopic examination. 

One of the most common ways to characterize the hydrophobicity (or hydrophilicity) of a material is through measurement of the contact angle, which is the angle between the liquid-gas interface and the solid surface measured at the triple point at which all three phases interconnect. The two most popular techniques to measure contact angles for diffusion layers are the sessile drop method and the capillary rise method (or Wihelmy method) [9,192]. 

For the DMFC, Zhang et al. [127] used the sessile drop method to study the wettabilities of liquid methanol solutions on the surface of the anode DLs and MPLs. They were able to observe that the contact angles of the materials were the smallest with low PTFE content. In addition, the effect of Nafion ionomer content on the MPL (to increase hydrophilicity see Section 4.3.2) was also shown through the contact angle measurements (i.e., smaller contact angles compared to MPLs with PTFE). 

Provides measuring techniques of contact angle, surface tension, interfacial tension, and bubble pressure. Suitable methods for both static and dynamic inteifacial tension of liquids include du Nous ring, Wilhelmy plate, spinning drop, pendant drop, bubble pressure, and drop volume techniques. Methods for solids include sessile drop, dynamic Wilhelmy, single fiber, and powder contact angle techniques. 

Important techniques to measure the surface tension of liquids are the sessile drop method, the pendant or sessile bubble method, the Du-Notiy ring tensiometer, and the Wilhelmy-plate method. 

Figure 7.6 Sessile drop and sessile bubble on a planar surface.

---