Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface free electrons

Several techniques can be used to determine the flatband potential of a semiconductor. The most straightforward method is to measure the photocurrent onset potential, ( onset- At potentials positive of (/>fb a depletion layer forms that enables the separation of photogenerated electrons and holes, so one would expect a photocurrent. However, the actual potential that needs to be applied before a photocurrent is observed is often several tenths of a volt more positive than ( fb- This can be due to recombination in the space charge layer [45], hole trapping at surface defects [46], or hole accumulation at the surface due to poor charge transfer kinetics [43]. A more reliable method for determining ( fb is electrolyte electroreflectance (EER), with which changes in the surface free electron concentration can be accurately detected [47]. The most often used method, however, is Mott- chottky analysis. Here, the 1/ Csc is plotted as a function of the applied potential and the value of the flatband... [Pg.43]

In the case of bindings, the potential energy of molecules and surfaces varies. When the molecule approaches the surface, free electrons of the molecule orbital facilitate the loss of electric charge. In opposite, the free orbital of the surface facilitates the loss of electric charge of the molecule. According to Fukui [10], when molecules A and B interact, it stabilizes when the highest level of occupied orbital (HOMO) of A interacts with the lower free orbital level (unoccupied) (LUMO) of B and vice versa. [Pg.72]

The second model is a quantum mechanical one where free electrons are contained in a box whose sides correspond to the surfaces of the metal. The wave functions for the standing waves inside the box yield permissible states essentially independent of the lattice type. The kinetic energy corresponding to the rejected states leads to the surface energy in fair agreement with experimental estimates [86, 87],... [Pg.270]

Figure 5.1 The parabolic distribution in energy, N(E), as function of energy, E, for free electrons. The Fermi surface represents the upper limit of electron energy at the absolute zero of temperature, but at higher temperatures a small fraction of the electrons can be excited to higher energy levels... Figure 5.1 The parabolic distribution in energy, N(E), as function of energy, E, for free electrons. The Fermi surface represents the upper limit of electron energy at the absolute zero of temperature, but at higher temperatures a small fraction of the electrons can be excited to higher energy levels...
Thermionic Emission - Because of. the nonzero temperature of the cathode, free electrons are continuously bouncing inside. Some of these have sufficient energy to overcome the work function of the material and can be found in the vicinity of the surface. The cathode may be heated to increase this emission. Also to enhance this effect, cathodes are usually made of, or coated with, a low work-function material such as thorium. [Pg.452]

A Degarive discharge electrode attracts positive ions and forces them to impact on its surface. These impacts provide an addirional source of electrons which contribute to the process. Ultraviolet light generated by the cormu glow causes photoelectric emission of electrons from the electrode surfaces, which further enhances the formation of free electrons. [Pg.1217]

If a paint film is to prevent this reaction, it must be impervious to electrons, otherwise the cathodic reaction is merely transferred from the surface of the metal to the surface of the film. Organic polymer films do not contain free electrons, except in the special case of pigmentation with metallic pigments consequently it will be assumed that the conductivity of paint films is entirely ionic. In addition, the films must be impervious to either water or oxygen, so that they prevent either from reaching the surface of the metal. [Pg.591]

Electrodes and Galvanic Cells. In connection with Fig. 9 in See. 11 we discussed the removal of a positive atomic core from a metal. The same idea may be applied to any alloy that is a metallic conductor. When, for example, some potassium has been dissolved in liquid mercury, the valence electron from each potassium atom becomes a free electron, and we may discuss the removal of a K+ core from the surface of the amalgam. The work to remove the K+ into a vacuum may be denoted by Ycr When this amalgam is in contact with a solvent, we may consider the escape of a K+ into the solvent. The work Y to remove the positive core into the solvent is much smaller than Yvac. [Pg.217]

Kabanov and Zingel [352] have recently published a comprehensive review of studies of the effect of application of continuous or periodic electric fields on the reactant during thermal decomposition of a solid. They comment on the superficiality of most of the work discussed. The application of an electric field is contrasted with the effect of selected additives as a means of obtaining information on the mechanism of a decomposition reaction. Both may alter the concentration of free electrons in the solid, but the effect of the field is more apparent in the vicinity of the surface. An example of an investigation of the effect of an electric field on a reaction is to be found in the work of the Panafieu et al. [373] on KN3. [Pg.33]

When an atom with a filled level at energy approaches a metal surface it will first of all chemisorb due to the interaction with the sp electrons of the metal. Consider for example an oxygen atom. The 2p level contains four electrons when the atom is isolated, but as it approaches the metal the 2p levels broaden and shift down in energy through the interaction with the sp band of the metal. Fig. 6.28(a) and (b) show this for adsorption on jellium, the ideal free-electron metal. [Pg.246]

Draw the density of states for a free electron gas as a function of energy. How can one modify the work function of a surface ... [Pg.408]

The fact that there is a potential difference between points close to the surfaces of two conductors in contact implies that the excess charge densities on their exposed snrfaces are different. This also implies that when two condnctors come in contact, there will be a redistribution of free electrons not only at the actnal inner contact snr-face (which gives rise to the Galvani potential) bnt also at their exposed surfaces. [Pg.144]

In terms of free-energy surfaces, multiple electron transitions correspond to multiple transitions between various free-energy surfaces of the initial and final states, and the system in fact moves along some effective potential profile. Multiple electron transitions allow one to speak about an average occupation of the... [Pg.652]


See other pages where Surface free electrons is mentioned: [Pg.81]    [Pg.3225]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.3225]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.1325]    [Pg.2213]    [Pg.2911]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.1216]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.332]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.356 ]




SEARCH



Free electrons

Free surface

Surface electronic

Surface electrons

© 2024 chempedia.info