Surface energy model

The attachment energy model first published by Hartman and Perdok in 1955 [32] specifically accounts for the intermolecular interactions in the crystals when calculating relative growth rates. The growth rate of a crystal face is proportional to the attachment energy, which in turn can be calculated from the lattice energy 

Although the attachment energy model accounts for the intermolecular interactions in the crystal, it does not account for any external influences such as solvent or impurity effects [34]. 

---

Hydrogen can decrease the strength of the metal-metal bond, thereby facilitating brittle fracture. Both the decohesion and surface energy models are based on this premise. 

The d = 13 X law led the author to develop a simple model whereby the critical energy for initiation can be predicted when the cell size and the equilibrium Chapman-Jouguet detonation states are known. This simple so-called surface energy model of Lee (34) gave predictions for the critical initiation charge weight for various hydrocarbon fuel-air mixtures in close accord with the experimental data obtained by Elsworth (39). 

Compression moided sampies, HAP-9440 paint, WORK surface-energy model. 

The total surface energy generally is larger than the surface free energy. It is frequently the more informative of the two quantities, or at least it is more easily related to molecular models. 

Face-centered cubic crystals of rare gases are a useful model system due to the simplicity of their interactions. Lattice sites are occupied by atoms interacting via a simple van der Waals potential with no orientation effects. The principal problem is to calculate the net energy of interaction across a plane, such as the one indicated by the dotted line in Fig. VII-4. In other words, as was the case with diamond, the surface energy at 0 K is essentially the excess potential energy of the molecules near the surface. 

The second model is a quantum mechanical one where free electrons are contained in a box whose sides correspond to the surfaces of the metal. The wave functions for the standing waves inside the box yield permissible states essentially independent of the lattice type. The kinetic energy corresponding to the rejected states leads to the surface energy in fair agreement with experimental estimates [86, 87],... 

This section will describe the current status of research in two different aspects of nanocrystal phase behaviour melting and solid-solid phase transitions. In the case of melting, thennodynamic considerations of surface energies can explain the reduced melting point observed in many nanocrystals. Strictly thennodynamic models, however, are not adequate to describe solid-solid phase transitions in these materials. 

We have recently been exploring this technique to evaluate the adhesive and mechanical properties of compliant polymers in the form of a nanoscale JKR test. The force and stiffness data from a force-displacement curve can be plotted simultaneously (Fig. 13). For these contacts, the stiffness response appears to follow the true contact stiffness, and the curve was fit (see [70]) to a JKR model. Both the surface energy and modulus can be determined from the curve. Using JKR analyses, the maximum pull off force, surface energy and tip radius are... 

---