Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface concentrations ionization

Both the calculated photoelectron ionization and escape depth data of Scofield (11) and Penn (12) are invaluable in estimating surface concentrations from Eq. (8). More recently, experimental cross section data have been reported by Thomas and his group (13) the reported data are relative to the F(ls) peak taken as unity. There are clearly examples where Scofield s calculated cross section values are at variance with the experimentally determined ones the variation is particularly noticeable when we consider outer levels, e.g., for K(2p) there are serious discrepancies, whereas the K(2s) data are acceptable. [Pg.61]

Since, in the first approximation, every oxygen atom captures one electron, the number of surface charges equals the total number of ionized defects in the boundary layer having a density equal to R ") (or the number of additional electron holes in the boundary layer produced by chemisorption) the surface concentration of chemisorbed oxygen atoms (gram atoms per square centimeter) is therefore... [Pg.223]

The above definition of the symmetric surface excess and the classical Guoy-Chapman model of the diffuse double layer are combined to show that the surface excess cannot be considered a surface concentration in the presence of an ionized monolayer on an impenetrable solid/liquid interface. [Pg.158]

It is a well-known fact that upon covalent immobilization at the surface, the dissociation constant of the acid-base indicator changes by as much as 3 pK units. This shift clearly illustrates the dramatic effect that the interphase has on the ionization equilibria. It is perhaps the most serious problem with optical sensors that the surface concentration of any species is related to its corresponding bulk activity value through an adsorption isotherm which, with the exception of Henry s law, is a highly nonlinear and variable relationship. It is also known (Davies and Rideal, 1963) that the surface pH is different from the bulk value due to the electrostatic repulsion. [Pg.301]

This method of finding the concentration of ions near the surface was applied by Davies (49,21) to the hydrolysis of ionized films of the ester monocetyl succinate. Table IX shows that the rate constant for this hydrolysis, which increased 300% if calculated using bulk concentrations of the catalytic hydroxyl ion, varied by not more than 36% when evaluated using the surface concentrations deduced from (xxv) and (xxvi). Figure 19 shows a similar effect for the addition of neutral salt, the marked catalysis by which is thus demonstrated to be due entirely to electrostatic effects. The acceleration in the rate of hydrolysis of a film cholesterol formate if the surface bears a negative charge can be predicted on the basis of the Donnan equations (xxv) and (xxvi). Values of 5 of 6 A. and 8 A. have been used, the results being compared with experiment in Fig. 21a. The calculated retardation is shown in Fig. 21b. [Pg.44]

Ki and Apparent pKa. Since palmitic and oleic acids formed stable monolayers when they were spread on acid subphases (see Ref. 23 and limiting surface areas in Figures 3 and 4), the fatty acid anion, X, was the only significant desorbing species from an unstable monolayer. Previous studies (24, 25) indicated that KA varied directly with the surface concentration, [X ], of a fatty acid anion when ionization and desorption were fast, quasi-equilibrium processes. Gershfeld and Patlak (25) described a test for quasi-equilibrium. They noted that the activity coefficient of the monolayer, y 9 may be estimated from 7r-A isotherms,... [Pg.62]

This method is based on the assumption that all available active centres of the surface are ionized and contain H+ or OH. For this reason, any pH change is a result of a reaction with the mineral smface. If concentrations of added acid and alkali are equal, respectively, and and the concentrations of H+ and OH in the suspension at titering always corresponds with the solution pH value and are equal to and then, if electric neutrality is observed, we get equality... [Pg.197]

Mechanical instabilities of polymer systems usually arise in shrinking or swelling gels. A classic example is the formation of patterns on the surface of ionized acrylamide gels that swell due to an osmotically driven inflow of water (20-22). This inflow leads to mechanical stress within the gel and shear bending of the solvent-exposed gel layer. Despite the complex reactivity of the PA-MBO system, this type of mechanical instability seems to persist in our experiments and provides a possible explanation for the sudden, often front-like transition to honeycomb patterns. In this process, the reduction of mechanical stress is affected by the spatially periodic concentration patterns. Consequently, one can interpret the outward displacement of particles during the third phase of motion as a truly chemo-mechanical phenomenon. [Pg.103]

FIGURE 22.7 Plot of MS/MS ion intensities (in counts per millisecond ionization time) versus CEES surface concentration, in monolayers. [Pg.499]

With this concept of isolated surface, we consider the surface zone as we have considered the case of the total sohd at high tenqjerature and to represent (section 3.6), in addition to ionization and association equilibriums, the exclmge of the adsorbed species with the gas phase and finally tlK electric neutrahty, which constitutes an association between the (surface) concentrations of the present species. [Pg.186]

If the molecules could be detected with 100% efficiency, the fluxes quoted above would lead to impressive detected signal levels. The first generation of reactive scattering experiments concentrated on reactions of alkali atoms, since surface ionization on a hot-wire detector is extremely efficient. Such detectors have been superseded by the universal mass spectrometer detector. For electron-bombardment ionization, the rate of fonnation of the molecular ions can be written as... [Pg.2062]


See other pages where Surface concentrations ionization is mentioned: [Pg.46]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.4670]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.901]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.15]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.29 , Pg.61 ]




SEARCH



Surface concentrations

Surface ionization

Surfaces concentrator

© 2024 chempedia.info