Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Support particle size distribution

New templated polymer support materials have been developed for use as re versed-phase packing materials. Pore size and particle size have not usually been precisely controlled by conventional suspension polymerization. A templated polymerization is used to obtain controllable pore size and particle-size distribution. In this technique, hydrophilic monomers and divinylbenzene are formulated and filled into pores in templated silica material, at room temperature. After polymerization, the templated silica material is removed by base hydrolysis. The surface of the polymer may be modified in various ways to obtain the desired functionality. The particles are useful in chromatography, adsorption, and ion exchange and as polymeric supports of catalysts (39,40). [Pg.10]

These results suggest that the surfaces of the a-Fc203 ellipsoid support play the role of nucleation centers of the precursor particles. The large precursor particles of 20—50nm were formed by aging for 72 h in the absence of any support. The size distribution was relatively narrow and each particle consisted of much smaller particles of 2—3 nm. As a consequence, the support plays an important role in the formation of the well-dispersed precursor nanoclusters. [Pg.396]

Figure 16.6 TEM micrographs of titania-supported Au particles. The nominal thickness of An was (a) 0.13 nm (h) 0.78nm (c) 1.56nm (d) 2.33 nm. The Au deposition rate was 2.6 X 10 nms. Particle size distributions of Au for various deposition times are shown in the plot, with the distrihutions fitted to a normal Gaussian function. Figure 16.6 TEM micrographs of titania-supported Au particles. The nominal thickness of An was (a) 0.13 nm (h) 0.78nm (c) 1.56nm (d) 2.33 nm. The Au deposition rate was 2.6 X 10 nms. Particle size distributions of Au for various deposition times are shown in the plot, with the distrihutions fitted to a normal Gaussian function.
Chemical composition of packings. Today, a wider variety of different support materials is available from which to choose. Silica is still widely used, though preparative grades often possess a relatively wide particle size distribution as compared to polymer-based supports. One serious limitation of silica-based supports is the low stability of silicas to alkaline pH conditions, which limits use of caustic solutions in sanitization and depyrogenation. Polymer-based supports, which include poly(styrene-divi-nyl benzene)- or methacrylate-based materials, are widely available and have gained increased acceptance and use. Nonfunctionalized poly(styrene-divinyl... [Pg.108]

Table 1 shows that catalysts prepared on the same type of support have about the same particle size distribution (PSD). Table 1 also shows that the newly developed CPS4 supported catalysts have the smallest span of particle size distribution, therefore, it has the fastest filtration rate. Filtration rate is measured by measuring the filtration time of 350 ml of 4-benzyloxyphenol debenzylation products. [Pg.114]

Particle size distribution for supported metals sometimes measured from electron micrographs and sometimes calculated from the measured number of... [Pg.5]

Perhaps the greatest difficulty in predicting fluidization performance via the Geldart (1973) classification is deciding on a single diameter to represent the complete material, especially if the product possesses a wide particle size distribution. This is supported to some extent by the more recent bulk density approach proposed by Geldart et al. (1984). [Pg.721]

Evaluation of the morphology of a pharmaceutical solid is of extreme importance, since this property exerts a significant influence over the bulk powder properties of the material. In addition to providing insights into the micromeritic properties of the solid, microscopy can also be used to develop preliminary estimations of the particle-size distribution. A determination can be easily made regarding the relative crystallinity of the material, and it is often possible to deduce crystallographic information as well. Unknown particulates can often be identified solely on the basis of their microscopic characteristics, although it is useful to obtain confirmatory support for these conclusions with the aid of microscopically assisted techniques. [Pg.128]

The types of intrinsic dissolution profiles obtainable through the loose powder and constant surface area methods are shown in Fig. 19. Oxy-phenbutazone was obtained as the crystalline anhydrate and monohydrate forms, with the monohydrate being the less soluble [129]. The loose powder dissolution profiles consisted of sharp initial increases, which gradually leveled off as the equilibrium solubility was reached. In the absence of supporting information, the solubility difference between the two species cannot be adequately understood until equilibrium solubility conditions are reached. In addition, the shape of the data curves is not amenable to quantitative mathematical manipulation. The advantage of the constant surface area method is evident in that its dissolution profiles are linear with time, and more easily compared. Additional information about the relative surface areas or particle size distributions of the two materials is not required, since these differences were eliminated when the analyte disc was prepared. [Pg.366]

The transmission electron microscope is now well established as a useful tool for the characterization of supported heterogeneous catalysts(l). Axial bright-field imaging in the conventional transmission electron microscope (CTEM) is routinely used to provide the catalyst chemist with details concerning particle size distributions, 3), particle disposition over the support material(2-6) as well as particle morphology(7). Internal crystal structure(8-10), and elemental compositions(ll) may be inferred by direct structure imaging. [Pg.360]

The form of the above equations suggests that the only properties of the bed on which the pressure gradient depends are its specific surface S (or particle size d) and its voidage e. However, the structure of the bed depends additionally on the particle size distribution, the particle shape and the way in which the bed has been formed in addition both the walls of the container and the nature of the bed support can considerably affect the way the particles pack. It would be expected, therefore, that experimentally determined values of pressure gradient would show a considerable scatter relative to the values predicted by the equations. The importance of some of these factors is discussed in the next section. [Pg.199]

Covering monometallic (Pd, Sn) and multimetallic (Pd-Sn, Pd-Ag) systems, several examples are presented in this chapter to illustrate the possibility offered by this chemistry to control the particle size distribution and the bimetallic interaction at a molecular level. This work is supported by a multitechnique characterization approachusing SnM6ssbauerspectroscopy,X-rayphotoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), low-energy ion spectroscopy (LEIS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Catalytic performances in hydrogenation of different unsaturated hydrocarbons (phenylacetylene, butadiene) are finally discussed in order to establish structure-reactivity relationships. [Pg.257]


See other pages where Support particle size distribution is mentioned: [Pg.540]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.628]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.1135]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.256]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.323 ]




SEARCH



Electrocatalyst supports particle-size distribution

Particle distribution

Particle size distribution

Particle sizing distribution

Particle-size Distribution Functions of Supported Catalysts

© 2024 chempedia.info