Substrates atomically smooth

For a reconstmcted surface, the effect of an adsorbate can be to provide a more bulk-like enviromnent for the outemiost layer of substrate atoms, thereby lifting the reconstmction. An example of this is As adsorbed onto Si(l 11)-(7 X 7) [37]. Arsenic atoms have one less valence electron than Si. Thus, if an As atom were to replace each outemiost Si atom in the bulk-temiinated stmcture, a smooth surface with no impaired electrons would be produced, with a second layer consisting of Si atoms in their bulk positions. Arsenic adsorption has, in fact, been found to remove the reconstmction and fomi a Si(l 11)-(1 x l)-As stmcture. This surface has a particularly high stability due to the absence of dangling bonds. 

Film Critical Current Densities Critical current densities of thin films have been reported by several hundreds of papers a few representative but by no means inclusive are noted here in addition to those mentioned above. Desirable attributes of thin films for technology are high transition temperature to zero resistance, high critical current, low substrate temperature during deposition, no high temperature post anneal, and atomically smooth surface without pinholes. A thermal coevaporation of yttrium, barium, and copper in an oxygen atmosphere have been deposited by Berberich (34) on substrates at 650°C with Tc s of 91 K on MgO and 89 K on SrTiOs without post anneal. Although critical currents of 106 A/cm2 were obtained at 4 K, values of 104 A/cm2 were found at 77 K. However,... 

The tendency of mica to cleave easily along the (100) crystallographic plane results in smooth,clean reproducible surfaces. This property, coupled with good thermal stability, has led to its wide use as a substrate in surface chemical studies (2). Indeed, the ability of Muscovite mica to be cleaved to give atomically smooth surfaces over areas of several square centimeters... 

The substrate surface smoothness is critical to TFT performance. Device fabrication processes basically duplicate and/or worsen the surface roughness, which leads to smaller pentacene grains and results in deterioration of pentacene channel mobility. Atomic-force microscopy was used to characterize the surface roughness. Figure 15.21 shows an AFM image of our PET substrate surface before any process. The mean-square roughness and peak-to-valley roughness are 10 A and 90 A,... 

Up to date, besides the SFA, several non-interferometric techniques have been developed for direct measurements of surface forces between solid surfaces. The most popular and widespread is atomic force microscopy, AFM [14]. This technique has been refined for surface forces measurements by introducing the colloidal probe technique [15,16], The AFM colloidal probe method is, compared to the SFA, rapid and allows for considerable flexibility with respect to the used substrates, taken into account that there is no requirement for the surfaces to be neither transparent, nor atomically smooth over macroscopic areas. However, it suffers an inherent drawback as compared to the SFA It is not possible to determine the absolute distance between the surfaces, which is a serious limitation, especially in studies of soft interfaces, such as, e.g., polymer adsorption layers. Another interesting surface forces technique that deserves attention is measurement and analysis of surface and interaction forces (MASIF), developed by Parker [17]. This technique allows measurement of interaction between two macroscopic surfaces and uses a bimorph as a force sensor. In analogy to the AFM, this technique allows for rapid measurements and expands flexibility with respect to substrate choice however, it fails if the absolute distance resolution is required. 

Clean substrate surfaces for nonoptical experiments were prepared by a series of Ar+-sputtering/thermal annealing cycles to remove surface impurities and restore atomic smoothness, respectively, using AES and/or XPS to determine cleanliness and LEED to assess surface ordering for single crystal specimens. Most of the work so far reported has involved nominally unreactive substrates, namely Ag and Au. 

The actual conditions that are the cause of coffee staining continue to generate debate mostly centred on the question of whether the contact line is initially pinned. Deegan used droplets of a colloidal suspension on atomically smooth mica to explore the issue of self-pinning. He said that rings form because the contact line cannot move and that some pre-existing conditions on the substrate temporarily anchor it until sohd material accumulates. However,... 

Figure 2.6 In situ STM images of a freshly prepared Au(lll) substrate showing the initial thermally induced reconstruction rows (visible as stripes) for different surface areas [2.10]. System Au(lll)/ 10 M H2SO4 at = - 150 mV vs. SCE and T = 298 K. (a) top view of an atomically smooth surface, and (b) 3D representation of a face with a monatomic step. Reprinted by permission of Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Generally, the process of nucleation in electrodeposition of metals can be considered as occuring on ideal or real substrates. Ideal substrates are considered free of ciystal imperfections and are characterized by an atomically smooth, homogeneous surface which does not exhibit preferred nucleation sites. On such substrates the number of nucleation sites, Zo, is equal to the number of adsorption sites Ns (cf. Section 8.3). 

In Eq. (4.15). pg is the areal density of the solid substrate. The fluid-fluid perturbation is just the attractive term of the LJ pair potential. Likewise, the (original) fluid-substrate perturbation is the L.T attraction -4efs (cTfs/r) . To be consistent with the smooth-wall approximation to the reference potential, we average the fluid-substrate attractions over the (x, y) positions of the substrate atoms in the planes in which they lie. We suppose each substrate to comprise an infinite half-space of atomic planes, separated successively by distance d. Approximating the sum over these planes by the Euler-MacLaurin formula [37] yields the expression in Eq. (4.15). 

An analysis of the iron silicide growth at small iron deposition rates (0.1-0.2 nm/min), small iron thicknesses (0.4-0.5 nm) and substrate temperature of 475 °C has shown that a formation of high-density (5-109-l-IO10 cm 2) nanosize p-FeSi2 islands (oblong of near round shape) is observed on both silicon surfaces. The surface between islands was not atomically smooth. This corresponds to destroy of atomically smooth surface between the silicide islands due to the strong silicon surface transport during silicide island formation. 

A platinum tip, diameter 280 nm, was brought into contact with an atomically smooth mica surface in ultrahigh vacuum. Although contact area was not measured directly, the friction results showed a good fit to JKR theory, as illustrated in Fig. 9.18. Sliding friction could be measured even when a tensile force was applied to pull the probe from the substrate. These results were similar to those of Homola et al who measured friction and contact area between smooth... 

---